From 4b457de495f1cbd8914f795060a37bedaa84f4f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yoann Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:37:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fichiers statistiques 50 et 100 arcs par noeud. --- 1967-stat-50 | 3534 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2106-stat | 2648 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ exo5.lisp | 2 +- stat.sh | 2 +- stat100.txt | 149 +++ stat50.txt | 0 6 files changed, 6333 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 1967-stat-50 create mode 100644 2106-stat create mode 100644 stat100.txt create mode 100644 stat50.txt diff --git a/1967-stat-50 b/1967-stat-50 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b10663c --- /dev/null +++ b/1967-stat-50 @@ -0,0 +1,3534 @@ +This is SBCL 1.0.40.0.debian, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. +More information about SBCL is available at . + +SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. +It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under +BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the +distribution for more information. +* +T +* +ek 3 +Evaluation took: + 0.000 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 581,022 processor cycles + 138,800 bytes consed + +di 3 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 743,756 processor cycles + 196,240 bytes consed + +ek 4 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 1,227,317 processor cycles + 244,912 bytes consed + +di 4 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 2,370,017 processor cycles + 488,304 bytes consed + +ek 5 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 2,491,229 processor cycles + 439,136 bytes consed + +di 5 +Evaluation took: + 0.007 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 142.86% CPU + 20,050,745 processor cycles + 1,092,464 bytes consed + +ek 6 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 4,209,101 processor cycles + 672,336 bytes consed + +di 6 +Evaluation took: + 0.004 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 250.00% CPU + 12,272,065 processor cycles + 1,916,928 bytes consed + +ek 7 +Evaluation took: + 0.002 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 6,203,951 processor cycles + 967,264 bytes consed + +di 7 +Evaluation took: + 0.008 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 125.00% CPU + 21,038,693 processor cycles + 3,139,712 bytes consed + +ek 8 +Evaluation took: + 0.003 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 8,069,828 processor cycles + 1,228,528 bytes consed + +di 8 +Evaluation took: + 0.015 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 66.67% CPU + 38,224,784 processor cycles + 4,731,328 bytes consed + +ek 9 +Evaluation took: + 0.005 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 200.00% CPU + 10,921,664 processor cycles + 1,611,472 bytes consed + +di 9 +Evaluation took: + 0.029 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.010 seconds non-GC time. ] + 68.97% CPU + 76,267,113 processor cycles + 6,669,184 bytes consed + +ek 10 +Evaluation took: + 0.006 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.010000 system) + 166.67% CPU + 15,904,863 processor cycles + 2,005,088 bytes consed + +di 10 +Evaluation took: + 0.037 seconds of real time + 0.040000 seconds of total run time (0.040000 user, 0.000000 system) + 108.11% CPU + 94,730,415 processor cycles + 9,861,920 bytes consed + +ek 11 +Evaluation took: + 0.006 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 16,888,456 processor cycles + 2,376,320 bytes consed + +di 11 +Evaluation took: + 0.039 seconds of real time + 0.040000 seconds of total run time (0.040000 user, 0.000000 system) + 102.56% CPU + 102,373,583 processor cycles + 11,686,096 bytes consed + +ek 12 +Evaluation took: + 0.008 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 125.00% CPU + 20,736,339 processor cycles + 2,796,688 bytes consed + +di 12 +Evaluation took: + 0.059 seconds of real time + 0.060000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.010000 system) + 101.69% CPU + 153,686,429 processor cycles + 16,387,248 bytes consed + +ek 13 +Evaluation took: + 0.010 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 26,153,205 processor cycles + 3,382,192 bytes consed + +di 13 +Evaluation took: + 0.082 seconds of real time + 0.080000 seconds of total run time (0.070000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.56% CPU + 213,712,785 processor cycles + 19,650,976 bytes consed + +ek 14 +Evaluation took: + 0.016 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 125.00% CPU + 41,213,029 processor cycles + 3,768,976 bytes consed + +di 14 +Evaluation took: + 0.090 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.090000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 233,076,259 processor cycles + 24,769,776 bytes consed + +ek 15 +Evaluation took: + 0.013 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 153.85% CPU + 33,960,095 processor cycles + 4,315,072 bytes consed + +di 15 +Evaluation took: + 0.117 seconds of real time + 0.110000 seconds of total run time (0.110000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.100 seconds non-GC time. ] + 94.02% CPU + 303,591,509 processor cycles + 29,798,416 bytes consed + +ek 16 +Evaluation took: + 0.017 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 117.65% CPU + 44,866,718 processor cycles + 4,779,056 bytes consed + +di 16 +Evaluation took: + 0.136 seconds of real time + 0.140000 seconds of total run time (0.140000 user, 0.000000 system) + 102.94% CPU + 354,163,277 processor cycles + 34,771,424 bytes consed + +ek 17 +Evaluation took: + 0.019 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 105.26% CPU + 50,001,198 processor cycles + 5,284,544 bytes consed + +di 17 +Evaluation took: + 0.153 seconds of real time + 0.160000 seconds of total run time (0.160000 user, 0.000000 system) + 104.58% CPU + 397,304,076 processor cycles + 38,995,824 bytes consed + +ek 18 +Evaluation took: + 0.020 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 51,883,728 processor cycles + 5,920,672 bytes consed + +di 18 +Evaluation took: + 0.196 seconds of real time + 0.200000 seconds of total run time (0.180000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.04% CPU + 508,411,813 processor cycles + 46,245,568 bytes consed + +ek 19 +Evaluation took: + 0.026 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 76.92% CPU + 68,478,085 processor cycles + 6,629,840 bytes consed + +di 19 +Evaluation took: + 0.235 seconds of real time + 0.240000 seconds of total run time (0.210000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.220 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.13% CPU + 608,137,504 processor cycles + 52,642,800 bytes consed + +ek 20 +Evaluation took: + 0.023 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 86.96% CPU + 60,621,327 processor cycles + 6,974,304 bytes consed + +di 20 +Evaluation took: + 0.248 seconds of real time + 0.250000 seconds of total run time (0.240000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.81% CPU + 644,750,977 processor cycles + 58,350,768 bytes consed + +ek 21 +Evaluation took: + 0.040 seconds of real time + 0.040000 seconds of total run time (0.030000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 103,651,379 processor cycles + 7,643,744 bytes consed + +di 21 +Evaluation took: + 0.271 seconds of real time + 0.270000 seconds of total run time (0.270000 user, 0.000000 system) + 99.63% CPU + 702,739,583 processor cycles + 65,710,784 bytes consed + +ek 22 +Evaluation took: + 0.033 seconds of real time + 0.030000 seconds of total run time (0.030000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 90.91% CPU + 84,215,430 processor cycles + 8,142,160 bytes consed + +di 22 +Evaluation took: + 0.323 seconds of real time + 0.320000 seconds of total run time (0.300000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.300 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.07% CPU + 835,309,345 processor cycles + 73,046,832 bytes consed + +ek 23 +Evaluation took: + 0.056 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.040000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.030 seconds non-GC time. ] + 89.29% CPU + 144,481,220 processor cycles + 8,910,608 bytes consed + +di 23 +Evaluation took: + 0.339 seconds of real time + 0.340000 seconds of total run time (0.330000 user, 0.010000 system) + 100.29% CPU + 877,416,462 processor cycles + 79,495,760 bytes consed + +ek 24 +Evaluation took: + 0.039 seconds of real time + 0.040000 seconds of total run time (0.040000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.030 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.56% CPU + 102,672,921 processor cycles + 9,487,344 bytes consed + +di 24 +Evaluation took: + 0.401 seconds of real time + 0.400000 seconds of total run time (0.400000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.75% CPU + 1,041,133,782 processor cycles + 91,235,584 bytes consed + +ek 25 +Evaluation took: + 0.042 seconds of real time + 0.040000 seconds of total run time (0.040000 user, 0.000000 system) + 95.24% CPU + 107,794,076 processor cycles + 10,276,048 bytes consed + +di 25 +Evaluation took: + 0.443 seconds of real time + 0.440000 seconds of total run time (0.420000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.410 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.32% CPU + 1,147,560,089 processor cycles + 99,166,480 bytes consed + +ek 26 +Evaluation took: + 0.040 seconds of real time + 0.040000 seconds of total run time (0.040000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 102,573,367 processor cycles + 10,762,448 bytes consed + +di 26 +Evaluation took: + 0.469 seconds of real time + 0.470000 seconds of total run time (0.460000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.21% CPU + 1,217,388,861 processor cycles + 105,710,256 bytes consed + +ek 27 +Evaluation took: + 0.047 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.030000 user, 0.020000 system) + 106.38% CPU + 122,133,882 processor cycles + 11,187,408 bytes consed + +di 27 +Evaluation took: + 0.466 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.450000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.71% CPU + 1,209,465,660 processor cycles + 108,602,048 bytes consed + +ek 28 +Evaluation took: + 0.051 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.04% CPU + 133,116,152 processor cycles + 11,951,728 bytes consed + +di 28 +Evaluation took: + 0.560 seconds of real time + 0.560000 seconds of total run time (0.530000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,452,956,063 processor cycles + 120,739,792 bytes consed + +ek 29 +Evaluation took: + 0.053 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 94.34% CPU + 136,131,229 processor cycles + 12,789,232 bytes consed + +di 29 +Evaluation took: + 0.610 seconds of real time + 0.610000 seconds of total run time (0.580000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.590 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,579,965,855 processor cycles + 133,359,904 bytes consed + +ek 30 +Evaluation took: + 0.068 seconds of real time + 0.070000 seconds of total run time (0.070000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.94% CPU + 176,553,832 processor cycles + 13,080,016 bytes consed + +di 30 +Evaluation took: + 0.585 seconds of real time + 0.580000 seconds of total run time (0.580000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.560 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.15% CPU + 1,518,668,528 processor cycles + 132,595,840 bytes consed + +ek 31 +Evaluation took: + 0.065 seconds of real time + 0.060000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.050 seconds non-GC time. ] + 92.31% CPU + 168,236,302 processor cycles + 13,969,344 bytes consed + +di 31 +Evaluation took: + 0.659 seconds of real time + 0.660000 seconds of total run time (0.650000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.640 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.15% CPU + 1,709,453,434 processor cycles + 144,065,552 bytes consed + +ek 32 +Evaluation took: + 0.094 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.060000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 95.74% CPU + 242,273,616 processor cycles + 14,634,880 bytes consed + +di 32 +Evaluation took: + 0.703 seconds of real time + 0.710000 seconds of total run time (0.710000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.700 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.00% CPU + 1,823,711,279 processor cycles + 156,955,280 bytes consed + +ek 33 +Evaluation took: + 0.068 seconds of real time + 0.070000 seconds of total run time (0.060000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.94% CPU + 176,072,754 processor cycles + 15,370,720 bytes consed + +di 33 +Evaluation took: + 0.759 seconds of real time + 0.760000 seconds of total run time (0.750000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.740 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.13% CPU + 1,968,720,039 processor cycles + 162,407,568 bytes consed + +ek 34 +Evaluation took: + 0.068 seconds of real time + 0.070000 seconds of total run time (0.070000 user, 0.000000 system) + 102.94% CPU + 176,624,890 processor cycles + 15,497,264 bytes consed + +di 34 +Evaluation took: + 0.736 seconds of real time + 0.740000 seconds of total run time (0.740000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.730 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.54% CPU + 1,909,735,568 processor cycles + 162,371,072 bytes consed + +ek 35 +Evaluation took: + 0.098 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.080000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 91.84% CPU + 252,746,247 processor cycles + 16,574,224 bytes consed + +di 35 +Evaluation took: + 0.818 seconds of real time + 0.820000 seconds of total run time (0.810000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.800 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.24% CPU + 2,119,961,181 processor cycles + 177,441,536 bytes consed + +ek 36 +Evaluation took: + 0.086 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.090000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 104.65% CPU + 222,585,298 processor cycles + 17,548,720 bytes consed + +di 36 +Evaluation took: + 0.930 seconds of real time + 0.920000 seconds of total run time (0.900000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.910 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.92% CPU + 2,410,015,153 processor cycles + 197,615,456 bytes consed + +ek 37 +Evaluation took: + 0.116 seconds of real time + 0.120000 seconds of total run time (0.110000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 103.45% CPU + 300,024,127 processor cycles + 17,741,776 bytes consed + +di 37 +Evaluation took: + 0.904 seconds of real time + 0.900000 seconds of total run time (0.890000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.870 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.56% CPU + 2,345,325,801 processor cycles + 194,630,544 bytes consed + +ek 38 +Evaluation took: + 0.087 seconds of real time + 0.080000 seconds of total run time (0.080000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 91.95% CPU + 225,895,579 processor cycles + 18,176,528 bytes consed + +di 38 +Evaluation took: + 0.982 seconds of real time + 0.990000 seconds of total run time (0.980000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.960 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.81% CPU + 2,548,004,576 processor cycles + 206,598,544 bytes consed + +ek 39 +Evaluation took: + 0.084 seconds of real time + 0.080000 seconds of total run time (0.080000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 95.24% CPU + 217,011,561 processor cycles + 18,826,560 bytes consed + +di 39 +Evaluation took: + 0.966 seconds of real time + 0.970000 seconds of total run time (0.950000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.940 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.41% CPU + 2,504,892,637 processor cycles + 204,535,856 bytes consed + +ek 40 +Evaluation took: + 0.089 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.080000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.12% CPU + 230,243,520 processor cycles + 19,244,928 bytes consed + +di 40 +Evaluation took: + 1.013 seconds of real time + 1.020000 seconds of total run time (1.000000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.69% CPU + 2,629,163,732 processor cycles + 214,332,512 bytes consed + +ek 41 +Evaluation took: + 0.095 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.090000 user, 0.000000 system) + 94.74% CPU + 246,325,391 processor cycles + 20,770,240 bytes consed + +di 41 +Evaluation took: + 1.181 seconds of real time + 1.190000 seconds of total run time (1.180000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 1.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.76% CPU + 3,063,243,339 processor cycles + 245,459,680 bytes consed + +ek 42 +Evaluation took: + 0.094 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.080000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 95.74% CPU + 243,636,120 processor cycles + 20,899,424 bytes consed + +di 42 +Evaluation took: + 1.184 seconds of real time + 1.180000 seconds of total run time (1.180000 user, 0.000000 system) + 99.66% CPU + 3,070,710,435 processor cycles + 248,910,080 bytes consed + +ek 43 +Evaluation took: + 0.103 seconds of real time + 0.100000 seconds of total run time (0.090000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.09% CPU + 266,291,610 processor cycles + 21,872,352 bytes consed + +di 43 +Evaluation took: + 1.232 seconds of real time + 1.230000 seconds of total run time (1.230000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 1.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.84% CPU + 3,195,548,005 processor cycles + 249,711,552 bytes consed + +ek 44 +Evaluation took: + 0.108 seconds of real time + 0.110000 seconds of total run time (0.110000 user, 0.000000 system) + 101.85% CPU + 279,622,148 processor cycles + 22,207,760 bytes consed + +di 44 +Evaluation took: + 1.261 seconds of real time + 1.260000 seconds of total run time (1.260000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 1.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 3,270,931,833 processor cycles + 258,225,472 bytes consed + +ek 45 +Evaluation took: + 0.116 seconds of real time + 0.110000 seconds of total run time (0.110000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.100 seconds non-GC time. ] + 94.83% CPU + 301,421,601 processor cycles + 23,822,448 bytes consed + +di 45 +Evaluation took: + 1.479 seconds of real time + 1.480000 seconds of total run time (1.480000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 1.420 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.07% CPU + 3,835,214,019 processor cycles + 292,458,768 bytes consed + +ek 46 +Evaluation took: + 0.118 seconds of real time + 0.120000 seconds of total run time (0.110000 user, 0.010000 system) + 101.69% CPU + 307,621,587 processor cycles + 24,397,616 bytes consed + +di 46 +Evaluation took: + 1.459 seconds of real time + 1.460000 seconds of total run time (1.430000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 1.420 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.07% CPU + 3,783,926,055 processor cycles + 295,383,984 bytes consed + +ek 47 +Evaluation took: + 0.106 seconds of real time + 0.100000 seconds of total run time (0.100000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 94.34% CPU + 274,612,065 processor cycles + 24,172,032 bytes consed + +di 47 +Evaluation took: + 1.387 seconds of real time + 1.380000 seconds of total run time (1.370000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 1.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.50% CPU + 3,596,080,111 processor cycles + 286,911,296 bytes consed + +ek 48 +Evaluation took: + 0.123 seconds of real time + 0.110000 seconds of total run time (0.090000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 89.43% CPU + 320,418,761 processor cycles + 25,204,816 bytes consed + +di 48 +Evaluation took: + 1.474 seconds of real time + 1.470000 seconds of total run time (1.450000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 1.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.73% CPU + 3,824,539,147 processor cycles + 299,029,008 bytes consed + +ek 49 +Evaluation took: + 0.130 seconds of real time + 0.130000 seconds of total run time (0.120000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 337,633,725 processor cycles + 25,920,608 bytes consed + +di 49 +Evaluation took: + 1.565 seconds of real time + 1.560000 seconds of total run time (1.550000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 1.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.68% CPU + 4,057,693,406 processor cycles + 316,437,024 bytes consed + +ek 50 +Evaluation took: + 0.127 seconds of real time + 0.130000 seconds of total run time (0.120000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.120 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.36% CPU + 330,166,538 processor cycles + 26,452,784 bytes consed + +di 50 +Evaluation took: + 1.629 seconds of real time + 1.630000 seconds of total run time (1.620000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 1.610 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.06% CPU + 4,225,315,094 processor cycles + 328,796,992 bytes consed + +ek 51 +Evaluation took: + 0.132 seconds of real time + 0.130000 seconds of total run time (0.130000 user, 0.000000 system) + 98.48% CPU + 341,598,894 processor cycles + 27,540,576 bytes consed + +di 51 +Evaluation took: + 1.691 seconds of real time + 1.690000 seconds of total run time (1.690000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 1.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 4,385,664,296 processor cycles + 340,910,256 bytes consed + +ek 52 +Evaluation took: + 0.139 seconds of real time + 0.140000 seconds of total run time (0.140000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.130 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.72% CPU + 361,477,623 processor cycles + 28,173,200 bytes consed + +di 52 +Evaluation took: + 1.789 seconds of real time + 1.790000 seconds of total run time (1.780000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 1.730 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.06% CPU + 4,639,605,763 processor cycles + 357,762,752 bytes consed + +ek 53 +Evaluation took: + 0.150 seconds of real time + 0.150000 seconds of total run time (0.140000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.130 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 389,445,875 processor cycles + 29,277,760 bytes consed + +di 53 +Evaluation took: + 1.867 seconds of real time + 1.860000 seconds of total run time (1.820000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 1.750 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.63% CPU + 4,843,898,280 processor cycles + 365,228,624 bytes consed + +ek 54 +Evaluation took: + 0.177 seconds of real time + 0.170000 seconds of total run time (0.170000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.130 seconds non-GC time. ] + 96.05% CPU + 460,632,588 processor cycles + 30,075,440 bytes consed + +di 54 +Evaluation took: + 1.913 seconds of real time + 1.920000 seconds of total run time (1.910000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 1.850 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.37% CPU + 4,961,056,828 processor cycles + 377,861,648 bytes consed + +ek 55 +Evaluation took: + 0.151 seconds of real time + 0.160000 seconds of total run time (0.160000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.140 seconds non-GC time. ] + 105.96% CPU + 391,012,141 processor cycles + 30,202,496 bytes consed + +di 55 +Evaluation took: + 1.927 seconds of real time + 1.920000 seconds of total run time (1.910000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 1.820 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.64% CPU + 4,997,269,940 processor cycles + 380,374,208 bytes consed + +ek 56 +Evaluation took: + 0.174 seconds of real time + 0.170000 seconds of total run time (0.170000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.70% CPU + 451,275,032 processor cycles + 31,560,128 bytes consed + +di 56 +Evaluation took: + 2.103 seconds of real time + 2.100000 seconds of total run time (2.070000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 2.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.86% CPU + 5,453,913,426 processor cycles + 415,885,408 bytes consed + +ek 57 +Evaluation took: + 0.172 seconds of real time + 0.170000 seconds of total run time (0.160000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.84% CPU + 445,699,644 processor cycles + 30,939,824 bytes consed + +di 57 +Evaluation took: + 1.936 seconds of real time + 1.940000 seconds of total run time (1.940000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 1.880 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.21% CPU + 5,020,911,532 processor cycles + 382,918,480 bytes consed + +ek 58 +Evaluation took: + 0.178 seconds of real time + 0.180000 seconds of total run time (0.170000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.12% CPU + 460,196,620 processor cycles + 32,248,176 bytes consed + +di 58 +Evaluation took: + 2.160 seconds of real time + 2.150000 seconds of total run time (2.130000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 2.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.54% CPU + 5,603,285,753 processor cycles + 413,207,200 bytes consed + +ek 59 +Evaluation took: + 0.181 seconds of real time + 0.180000 seconds of total run time (0.160000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.140 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.45% CPU + 467,772,318 processor cycles + 32,525,408 bytes consed + +di 59 +Evaluation took: + 2.063 seconds of real time + 2.060000 seconds of total run time (2.050000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 1.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.85% CPU + 5,349,952,218 processor cycles + 405,337,920 bytes consed + +ek 60 +Evaluation took: + 0.195 seconds of real time + 0.200000 seconds of total run time (0.200000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.160 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.56% CPU + 505,453,520 processor cycles + 34,289,568 bytes consed + +di 60 +Evaluation took: + 2.340 seconds of real time + 2.340000 seconds of total run time (2.310000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 2.220 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 6,070,006,956 processor cycles + 447,848,992 bytes consed + +ek 61 +Evaluation took: + 0.198 seconds of real time + 0.200000 seconds of total run time (0.190000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.160 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.01% CPU + 514,445,503 processor cycles + 34,401,776 bytes consed + +di 61 +Evaluation took: + 2.287 seconds of real time + 2.290000 seconds of total run time (2.280000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 2.210 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.13% CPU + 5,930,369,276 processor cycles + 447,449,424 bytes consed + +ek 62 +Evaluation took: + 0.198 seconds of real time + 0.190000 seconds of total run time (0.160000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 95.96% CPU + 513,462,079 processor cycles + 34,379,792 bytes consed + +di 62 +Evaluation took: + 2.241 seconds of real time + 2.230000 seconds of total run time (2.190000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 2.210 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.51% CPU + 5,812,498,731 processor cycles + 443,012,192 bytes consed + +ek 63 +Evaluation took: + 0.198 seconds of real time + 0.200000 seconds of total run time (0.190000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.170 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.01% CPU + 511,838,184 processor cycles + 34,979,344 bytes consed + +di 63 +Evaluation took: + 2.309 seconds of real time + 2.310000 seconds of total run time (2.280000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 2.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 5,988,154,094 processor cycles + 451,281,520 bytes consed + +ek 64 +Evaluation took: + 0.220 seconds of real time + 0.220000 seconds of total run time (0.220000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 569,717,343 processor cycles + 37,188,272 bytes consed + +di 64 +Evaluation took: + 2.636 seconds of real time + 2.640000 seconds of total run time (2.630000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 2.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.15% CPU + 6,836,708,164 processor cycles + 503,242,256 bytes consed + +ek 65 +Evaluation took: + 0.221 seconds of real time + 0.220000 seconds of total run time (0.200000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.55% CPU + 574,845,804 processor cycles + 37,504,624 bytes consed + +di 65 +Evaluation took: + 2.555 seconds of real time + 2.560000 seconds of total run time (2.500000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 2.490 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.20% CPU + 6,627,682,373 processor cycles + 495,386,688 bytes consed + +ek 66 +Evaluation took: + 0.208 seconds of real time + 0.210000 seconds of total run time (0.200000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.96% CPU + 539,089,395 processor cycles + 37,733,024 bytes consed + +di 66 +Evaluation took: + 2.649 seconds of real time + 2.650000 seconds of total run time (2.650000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 2.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 6,869,736,159 processor cycles + 504,861,216 bytes consed + +ek 67 +Evaluation took: + 0.218 seconds of real time + 0.220000 seconds of total run time (0.200000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.92% CPU + 566,933,770 processor cycles + 38,931,392 bytes consed + +di 67 +Evaluation took: + 2.762 seconds of real time + 2.760000 seconds of total run time (2.710000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.220 seconds GC time, and 2.540 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 7,163,180,375 processor cycles + 518,729,728 bytes consed + +ek 68 +Evaluation took: + 0.234 seconds of real time + 0.230000 seconds of total run time (0.230000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.29% CPU + 606,757,463 processor cycles + 39,581,216 bytes consed + +di 68 +Evaluation took: + 2.698 seconds of real time + 2.700000 seconds of total run time (2.700000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 2.560 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.07% CPU + 6,996,633,813 processor cycles + 516,052,512 bytes consed + +ek 69 +Evaluation took: + 0.228 seconds of real time + 0.230000 seconds of total run time (0.230000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.88% CPU + 591,499,038 processor cycles + 39,925,040 bytes consed + +di 69 +Evaluation took: + 2.706 seconds of real time + 2.690000 seconds of total run time (2.650000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 2.600 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.41% CPU + 7,018,764,701 processor cycles + 516,109,440 bytes consed + +ek 70 +Evaluation took: + 0.238 seconds of real time + 0.240000 seconds of total run time (0.220000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.210 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.84% CPU + 617,122,623 processor cycles + 41,222,480 bytes consed + +di 70 +Evaluation took: + 2.990 seconds of real time + 2.990000 seconds of total run time (2.970000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 2.870 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 7,752,023,578 processor cycles + 568,557,088 bytes consed + +ek 71 +Evaluation took: + 0.234 seconds of real time + 0.230000 seconds of total run time (0.230000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.29% CPU + 608,967,034 processor cycles + 41,652,272 bytes consed + +di 71 +Evaluation took: + 2.974 seconds of real time + 2.970000 seconds of total run time (2.920000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 2.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 7,712,238,053 processor cycles + 563,615,696 bytes consed + +ek 72 +Evaluation took: + 0.245 seconds of real time + 0.250000 seconds of total run time (0.250000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.210 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.04% CPU + 635,000,795 processor cycles + 42,122,400 bytes consed + +di 72 +Evaluation took: + 2.911 seconds of real time + 2.910000 seconds of total run time (2.860000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 2.810 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 7,551,278,098 processor cycles + 548,640,448 bytes consed + +ek 73 +Evaluation took: + 0.261 seconds of real time + 0.260000 seconds of total run time (0.240000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.62% CPU + 674,945,414 processor cycles + 43,541,536 bytes consed + +di 73 +Evaluation took: + 3.034 seconds of real time + 3.030000 seconds of total run time (3.010000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 2.910 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 7,867,782,858 processor cycles + 573,804,672 bytes consed + +ek 74 +Evaluation took: + 0.225 seconds of real time + 0.230000 seconds of total run time (0.210000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.220 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.22% CPU + 584,829,609 processor cycles + 43,959,440 bytes consed + +di 74 +Evaluation took: + 3.092 seconds of real time + 3.090000 seconds of total run time (3.050000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 2.980 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 8,019,990,251 processor cycles + 587,531,488 bytes consed + +ek 75 +Evaluation took: + 0.266 seconds of real time + 0.270000 seconds of total run time (0.260000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.50% CPU + 690,141,231 processor cycles + 45,230,672 bytes consed + +di 75 +Evaluation took: + 3.224 seconds of real time + 3.220000 seconds of total run time (3.180000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.150 seconds GC time, and 3.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 8,360,389,687 processor cycles + 605,795,264 bytes consed + +ek 76 +Evaluation took: + 0.228 seconds of real time + 0.220000 seconds of total run time (0.210000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 96.49% CPU + 592,128,966 processor cycles + 45,252,800 bytes consed + +di 76 +Evaluation took: + 3.341 seconds of real time + 3.340000 seconds of total run time (3.290000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.150 seconds GC time, and 3.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 8,665,158,580 processor cycles + 622,113,184 bytes consed + +ek 77 +Evaluation took: + 0.286 seconds of real time + 0.290000 seconds of total run time (0.290000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.40% CPU + 742,092,078 processor cycles + 47,095,472 bytes consed + +di 77 +Evaluation took: + 3.524 seconds of real time + 3.510000 seconds of total run time (3.470000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.170 seconds GC time, and 3.340 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.60% CPU + 9,140,209,858 processor cycles + 650,899,296 bytes consed + +ek 78 +Evaluation took: + 0.259 seconds of real time + 0.260000 seconds of total run time (0.240000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.220 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.39% CPU + 673,489,037 processor cycles + 45,243,408 bytes consed + +di 78 +Evaluation took: + 3.209 seconds of real time + 3.210000 seconds of total run time (3.190000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 3.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.03% CPU + 8,321,501,799 processor cycles + 605,547,104 bytes consed + +ek 79 +Evaluation took: + 0.266 seconds of real time + 0.270000 seconds of total run time (0.270000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.50% CPU + 690,577,732 processor cycles + 47,709,920 bytes consed + +di 79 +Evaluation took: + 3.630 seconds of real time + 3.630000 seconds of total run time (3.580000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.170 seconds GC time, and 3.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 9,415,353,389 processor cycles + 678,907,584 bytes consed + +ek 80 +Evaluation took: + 0.281 seconds of real time + 0.280000 seconds of total run time (0.270000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.64% CPU + 726,950,276 processor cycles + 47,784,432 bytes consed + +di 80 +Evaluation took: + 3.663 seconds of real time + 3.670000 seconds of total run time (3.590000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.270 seconds GC time, and 3.400 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.19% CPU + 9,499,889,438 processor cycles + 663,252,256 bytes consed + +ek 81 +Evaluation took: + 0.282 seconds of real time + 0.280000 seconds of total run time (0.230000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.29% CPU + 729,278,758 processor cycles + 48,174,048 bytes consed + +di 81 +Evaluation took: + 3.556 seconds of real time + 3.550000 seconds of total run time (3.470000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.200 seconds GC time, and 3.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.83% CPU + 9,222,709,353 processor cycles + 658,770,256 bytes consed + +ek 82 +Evaluation took: + 0.299 seconds of real time + 0.300000 seconds of total run time (0.300000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.250 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.33% CPU + 775,200,192 processor cycles + 49,563,040 bytes consed + +di 82 +Evaluation took: + 3.678 seconds of real time + 3.680000 seconds of total run time (3.580000 user, 0.100000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.230 seconds GC time, and 3.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.05% CPU + 9,539,952,292 processor cycles + 674,516,496 bytes consed + +ek 83 +Evaluation took: + 0.301 seconds of real time + 0.310000 seconds of total run time (0.290000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.99% CPU + 780,759,252 processor cycles + 50,563,936 bytes consed + +di 83 +Evaluation took: + 3.769 seconds of real time + 3.760000 seconds of total run time (3.750000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.210 seconds GC time, and 3.550 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.76% CPU + 9,774,271,351 processor cycles + 696,413,392 bytes consed + +ek 84 +Evaluation took: + 0.316 seconds of real time + 0.310000 seconds of total run time (0.260000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.10% CPU + 818,985,739 processor cycles + 51,149,408 bytes consed + +di 84 +Evaluation took: + 4.038 seconds of real time + 4.030000 seconds of total run time (3.940000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.260 seconds GC time, and 3.770 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.80% CPU + 10,474,428,757 processor cycles + 728,647,904 bytes consed + +ek 85 +Evaluation took: + 0.301 seconds of real time + 0.300000 seconds of total run time (0.290000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.250 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.67% CPU + 781,874,938 processor cycles + 52,006,128 bytes consed + +di 85 +Evaluation took: + 3.860 seconds of real time + 3.860000 seconds of total run time (3.810000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.180 seconds GC time, and 3.680 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 10,010,463,008 processor cycles + 717,931,376 bytes consed + +ek 86 +Evaluation took: + 0.280 seconds of real time + 0.280000 seconds of total run time (0.270000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 726,406,824 processor cycles + 51,397,072 bytes consed + +di 86 +Evaluation took: + 3.747 seconds of real time + 3.750000 seconds of total run time (3.680000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.200 seconds GC time, and 3.550 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.08% CPU + 9,717,506,279 processor cycles + 694,964,128 bytes consed + +ek 87 +Evaluation took: + 0.317 seconds of real time + 0.320000 seconds of total run time (0.310000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.95% CPU + 821,686,151 processor cycles + 52,633,184 bytes consed + +di 87 +Evaluation took: + 4.083 seconds of real time + 4.080000 seconds of total run time (4.050000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.230 seconds GC time, and 3.850 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 10,587,565,274 processor cycles + 746,816,752 bytes consed + +ek 88 +Evaluation took: + 0.325 seconds of real time + 0.320000 seconds of total run time (0.320000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.46% CPU + 842,439,312 processor cycles + 53,856,400 bytes consed + +di 88 +Evaluation took: + 4.225 seconds of real time + 4.220000 seconds of total run time (4.150000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.160 seconds GC time, and 4.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 10,956,657,647 processor cycles + 779,293,232 bytes consed + +ek 89 +Evaluation took: + 0.315 seconds of real time + 0.320000 seconds of total run time (0.300000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.59% CPU + 816,393,760 processor cycles + 53,819,760 bytes consed + +di 89 +Evaluation took: + 4.123 seconds of real time + 4.120000 seconds of total run time (4.080000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.250 seconds GC time, and 3.870 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 10,691,307,809 processor cycles + 747,569,168 bytes consed + +ek 90 +Evaluation took: + 0.342 seconds of real time + 0.350000 seconds of total run time (0.340000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.300 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.34% CPU + 888,340,596 processor cycles + 56,528,000 bytes consed + +di 90 +Evaluation took: + 4.505 seconds of real time + 4.500000 seconds of total run time (4.430000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.240 seconds GC time, and 4.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 11,684,443,784 processor cycles + 821,324,160 bytes consed + +ek 91 +Evaluation took: + 0.324 seconds of real time + 0.320000 seconds of total run time (0.280000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.77% CPU + 840,324,238 processor cycles + 55,379,312 bytes consed + +di 91 +Evaluation took: + 4.120 seconds of real time + 4.110000 seconds of total run time (4.0000000 user, 0.110000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.200 seconds GC time, and 3.910 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.76% CPU + 10,686,432,146 processor cycles + 754,043,248 bytes consed + +ek 92 +Evaluation took: + 0.291 seconds of real time + 0.290000 seconds of total run time (0.280000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.66% CPU + 753,640,706 processor cycles + 56,307,856 bytes consed + +di 92 +Evaluation took: + 4.249 seconds of real time + 4.240000 seconds of total run time (4.190000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.160 seconds GC time, and 4.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.79% CPU + 11,017,373,484 processor cycles + 776,131,792 bytes consed + +ek 93 +Evaluation took: + 0.357 seconds of real time + 0.360000 seconds of total run time (0.340000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.310 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.84% CPU + 924,127,698 processor cycles + 58,258,032 bytes consed + +di 93 +Evaluation took: + 4.612 seconds of real time + 4.610000 seconds of total run time (4.530000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.180 seconds GC time, and 4.430 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 11,961,271,660 processor cycles + 836,089,744 bytes consed + +ek 94 +Evaluation took: + 0.408 seconds of real time + 0.410000 seconds of total run time (0.390000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 0.290 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.49% CPU + 1,057,585,815 processor cycles + 57,302,048 bytes consed + +di 94 +Evaluation took: + 4.161 seconds of real time + 4.150000 seconds of total run time (4.080000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 4.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.74% CPU + 10,791,863,628 processor cycles + 774,907,568 bytes consed + +ek 95 +Evaluation took: + 0.361 seconds of real time + 0.360000 seconds of total run time (0.350000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.72% CPU + 934,634,116 processor cycles + 59,575,920 bytes consed + +di 95 +Evaluation took: + 4.622 seconds of real time + 4.620000 seconds of total run time (4.560000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.240 seconds GC time, and 4.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 11,987,446,913 processor cycles + 839,150,496 bytes consed + +ek 96 +Evaluation took: + 0.403 seconds of real time + 0.400000 seconds of total run time (0.370000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.26% CPU + 1,045,879,445 processor cycles + 60,979,440 bytes consed + +di 96 +Evaluation took: + 4.800 seconds of real time + 4.800000 seconds of total run time (4.740000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.180 seconds GC time, and 4.620 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 12,447,828,224 processor cycles + 882,156,304 bytes consed + +ek 97 +Evaluation took: + 0.364 seconds of real time + 0.370000 seconds of total run time (0.350000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.65% CPU + 944,273,005 processor cycles + 60,768,208 bytes consed + +di 97 +Evaluation took: + 4.761 seconds of real time + 4.750000 seconds of total run time (4.690000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.240 seconds GC time, and 4.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.77% CPU + 12,348,475,360 processor cycles + 859,305,936 bytes consed + +ek 98 +Evaluation took: + 0.388 seconds of real time + 0.390000 seconds of total run time (0.340000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.310 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.52% CPU + 1,007,742,749 processor cycles + 60,143,408 bytes consed + +di 98 +Evaluation took: + 4.606 seconds of real time + 4.610000 seconds of total run time (4.530000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.180 seconds GC time, and 4.430 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.09% CPU + 11,945,555,973 processor cycles + 848,795,056 bytes consed + +ek 99 +Evaluation took: + 0.374 seconds of real time + 0.380000 seconds of total run time (0.380000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.340 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.60% CPU + 969,072,299 processor cycles + 62,305,264 bytes consed + +di 99 +Evaluation took: + 5.010 seconds of real time + 5.010000 seconds of total run time (4.950000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.260 seconds GC time, and 4.750 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 12,992,456,516 processor cycles + 907,327,296 bytes consed + +ek 100 +Evaluation took: + 0.457 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.430000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 0.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.66% CPU + 1,186,292,653 processor cycles + 63,152,256 bytes consed + +di 100 +Evaluation took: + 5.010 seconds of real time + 5.0000000 seconds of total run time (4.940000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.190 seconds GC time, and 4.810 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.80% CPU + 12,994,330,024 processor cycles + 909,180,048 bytes consed + +ek 101 +Evaluation took: + 0.361 seconds of real time + 0.360000 seconds of total run time (0.340000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.72% CPU + 938,129,686 processor cycles + 64,373,168 bytes consed + +di 101 +Evaluation took: + 5.284 seconds of real time + 5.280000 seconds of total run time (5.150000 user, 0.130000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.170 seconds GC time, and 5.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 13,704,359,370 processor cycles + 950,017,856 bytes consed + +ek 102 +Evaluation took: + 0.402 seconds of real time + 0.400000 seconds of total run time (0.370000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.310 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.50% CPU + 1,041,022,580 processor cycles + 62,798,400 bytes consed + +di 102 +Evaluation took: + 4.748 seconds of real time + 4.750000 seconds of total run time (4.650000 user, 0.100000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.260 seconds GC time, and 4.490 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 12,312,489,046 processor cycles + 867,580,080 bytes consed + +ek 103 +Evaluation took: + 0.377 seconds of real time + 0.380000 seconds of total run time (0.380000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.80% CPU + 976,918,774 processor cycles + 63,379,184 bytes consed + +di 103 +Evaluation took: + 5.179 seconds of real time + 5.180000 seconds of total run time (5.130000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.160 seconds GC time, and 5.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.02% CPU + 13,432,085,758 processor cycles + 927,702,768 bytes consed + +ek 104 +Evaluation took: + 0.354 seconds of real time + 0.350000 seconds of total run time (0.330000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.87% CPU + 919,088,534 processor cycles + 63,960,400 bytes consed + +di 104 +Evaluation took: + 4.850 seconds of real time + 4.850000 seconds of total run time (4.750000 user, 0.100000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 4.710 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 12,578,794,501 processor cycles + 882,993,712 bytes consed + +ek 105 +Evaluation took: + 0.455 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.430000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 0.340 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.10% CPU + 1,179,770,670 processor cycles + 66,746,000 bytes consed + +di 105 +Evaluation took: + 5.384 seconds of real time + 5.380000 seconds of total run time (5.260000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.240 seconds GC time, and 5.140 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 13,963,966,601 processor cycles + 972,553,984 bytes consed + +ek 106 +Evaluation took: + 0.388 seconds of real time + 0.390000 seconds of total run time (0.380000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.52% CPU + 1,008,356,102 processor cycles + 66,372,192 bytes consed + +di 106 +Evaluation took: + 5.196 seconds of real time + 5.200000 seconds of total run time (5.140000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.200 seconds GC time, and 5.0000 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.08% CPU + 13,475,880,093 processor cycles + 927,728,432 bytes consed + +ek 107 +Evaluation took: + 0.363 seconds of real time + 0.360000 seconds of total run time (0.350000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.17% CPU + 941,226,598 processor cycles + 68,095,344 bytes consed + +di 107 +Evaluation took: + 5.597 seconds of real time + 5.600000 seconds of total run time (5.510000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.190 seconds GC time, and 5.410 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.05% CPU + 14,516,939,047 processor cycles + 1,009,786,800 bytes consed + +ek 108 +Evaluation took: + 0.435 seconds of real time + 0.440000 seconds of total run time (0.430000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.370 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.15% CPU + 1,128,640,604 processor cycles + 69,246,832 bytes consed + +di 108 +Evaluation took: + 5.751 seconds of real time + 5.740000 seconds of total run time (5.660000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.280 seconds GC time, and 5.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.81% CPU + 14,915,648,865 processor cycles + 1,024,207,584 bytes consed + +ek 109 +Evaluation took: + 0.412 seconds of real time + 0.410000 seconds of total run time (0.380000 user, 0.030000 system) + 99.51% CPU + 1,068,222,363 processor cycles + 70,895,664 bytes consed + +di 109 +Evaluation took: + 6.012 seconds of real time + 6.020000 seconds of total run time (5.930000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.300 seconds GC time, and 5.720 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.13% CPU + 15,591,866,017 processor cycles + 1,083,151,040 bytes consed + +ek 110 +Evaluation took: + 0.374 seconds of real time + 0.370000 seconds of total run time (0.350000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.93% CPU + 971,383,218 processor cycles + 69,038,288 bytes consed + +di 110 +Evaluation took: + 5.638 seconds of real time + 5.640000 seconds of total run time (5.530000 user, 0.110000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.260 seconds GC time, and 5.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 14,622,017,189 processor cycles + 996,989,232 bytes consed + +ek 111 +Evaluation took: + 0.396 seconds of real time + 0.400000 seconds of total run time (0.390000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.340 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.01% CPU + 1,027,285,168 processor cycles + 69,757,456 bytes consed + +di 111 +Evaluation took: + 5.582 seconds of real time + 5.570000 seconds of total run time (5.450000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.310 seconds GC time, and 5.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.79% CPU + 14,478,085,323 processor cycles + 984,942,848 bytes consed + +ek 112 +Evaluation took: + 0.432 seconds of real time + 0.430000 seconds of total run time (0.410000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.54% CPU + 1,119,291,251 processor cycles + 71,660,928 bytes consed + +di 112 +Evaluation took: + 6.011 seconds of real time + 6.010000 seconds of total run time (5.890000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.340 seconds GC time, and 5.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 15,590,057,834 processor cycles + 1,065,475,120 bytes consed + +ek 113 +Evaluation took: + 0.491 seconds of real time + 0.490000 seconds of total run time (0.450000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 0.370 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.80% CPU + 1,272,541,218 processor cycles + 71,667,712 bytes consed + +di 113 +Evaluation took: + 5.805 seconds of real time + 5.800000 seconds of total run time (5.640000 user, 0.160000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.270 seconds GC time, and 5.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.91% CPU + 15,054,600,535 processor cycles + 1,038,494,672 bytes consed + +ek 114 +Evaluation took: + 0.419 seconds of real time + 0.420000 seconds of total run time (0.400000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.24% CPU + 1,086,570,043 processor cycles + 73,522,464 bytes consed + +di 114 +Evaluation took: + 6.314 seconds of real time + 6.320000 seconds of total run time (6.170000 user, 0.150000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.300 seconds GC time, and 6.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.10% CPU + 16,376,841,091 processor cycles + 1,110,603,040 bytes consed + +ek 115 +Evaluation took: + 0.419 seconds of real time + 0.420000 seconds of total run time (0.400000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.360 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.24% CPU + 1,085,316,050 processor cycles + 72,829,312 bytes consed + +di 115 +Evaluation took: + 6.067 seconds of real time + 6.060000 seconds of total run time (5.980000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.370 seconds GC time, and 5.690 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 15,734,695,600 processor cycles + 1,066,796,592 bytes consed + +ek 116 +Evaluation took: + 0.458 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.430000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.44% CPU + 1,186,558,802 processor cycles + 74,531,040 bytes consed + +di 116 +Evaluation took: + 6.364 seconds of real time + 6.350000 seconds of total run time (6.240000 user, 0.110000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.420 seconds GC time, and 5.930 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.78% CPU + 16,504,704,892 processor cycles + 1,101,183,856 bytes consed + +ek 117 +Evaluation took: + 0.441 seconds of real time + 0.440000 seconds of total run time (0.430000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.400 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.77% CPU + 1,141,938,616 processor cycles + 74,851,968 bytes consed + +di 117 +Evaluation took: + 6.238 seconds of real time + 6.230000 seconds of total run time (6.070000 user, 0.160000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.360 seconds GC time, and 5.870 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 16,176,502,641 processor cycles + 1,088,971,264 bytes consed + +ek 118 +Evaluation took: + 0.431 seconds of real time + 0.430000 seconds of total run time (0.420000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.77% CPU + 1,116,929,866 processor cycles + 74,956,272 bytes consed + +di 118 +Evaluation took: + 6.481 seconds of real time + 6.470000 seconds of total run time (6.310000 user, 0.160000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.310 seconds GC time, and 6.160 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.83% CPU + 16,808,058,813 processor cycles + 1,140,289,888 bytes consed + +ek 119 +Evaluation took: + 0.475 seconds of real time + 0.470000 seconds of total run time (0.460000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.95% CPU + 1,232,253,386 processor cycles + 79,460,160 bytes consed + +di 119 +Evaluation took: + 7.286 seconds of real time + 7.290000 seconds of total run time (7.160000 user, 0.130000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.450 seconds GC time, and 6.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.05% CPU + 18,898,402,471 processor cycles + 1,256,378,704 bytes consed + +ek 120 +Evaluation took: + 0.457 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.440000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.66% CPU + 1,187,186,065 processor cycles + 77,473,984 bytes consed + +di 120 +Evaluation took: + 6.605 seconds of real time + 6.590000 seconds of total run time (6.430000 user, 0.160000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.420 seconds GC time, and 6.170 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.77% CPU + 17,131,428,808 processor cycles + 1,147,311,248 bytes consed + +ek 121 +Evaluation took: + 0.464 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.450000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.14% CPU + 1,204,989,695 processor cycles + 79,386,448 bytes consed + +di 121 +Evaluation took: + 6.956 seconds of real time + 6.960000 seconds of total run time (6.840000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.450 seconds GC time, and 6.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.06% CPU + 18,040,448,036 processor cycles + 1,212,943,872 bytes consed + +ek 122 +Evaluation took: + 0.488 seconds of real time + 0.490000 seconds of total run time (0.470000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.400 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.41% CPU + 1,266,703,945 processor cycles + 78,931,008 bytes consed + +di 122 +Evaluation took: + 6.578 seconds of real time + 6.570000 seconds of total run time (6.480000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.330 seconds GC time, and 6.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 17,059,662,347 processor cycles + 1,142,443,184 bytes consed + +ek 123 +Evaluation took: + 0.584 seconds of real time + 0.590000 seconds of total run time (0.580000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.03% CPU + 1,513,821,777 processor cycles + 80,844,768 bytes consed + +di 123 +Evaluation took: + 7.217 seconds of real time + 7.210000 seconds of total run time (7.090000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.410 seconds GC time, and 6.800 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 18,717,506,080 processor cycles + 1,246,276,416 bytes consed + +ek 124 +Evaluation took: + 0.466 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.450000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.430 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.71% CPU + 1,208,854,465 processor cycles + 80,401,840 bytes consed + +di 124 +Evaluation took: + 6.863 seconds of real time + 6.870000 seconds of total run time (6.780000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.430 seconds GC time, and 6.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.10% CPU + 17,799,327,910 processor cycles + 1,182,990,048 bytes consed + +ek 125 +Evaluation took: + 0.491 seconds of real time + 0.480000 seconds of total run time (0.470000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.76% CPU + 1,273,155,442 processor cycles + 81,893,904 bytes consed + +di 125 +Evaluation took: + 7.442 seconds of real time + 7.440000 seconds of total run time (7.330000 user, 0.110000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.350 seconds GC time, and 7.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 19,301,563,645 processor cycles + 1,279,699,120 bytes consed + +ek 126 +Evaluation took: + 0.473 seconds of real time + 0.470000 seconds of total run time (0.440000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.37% CPU + 1,228,844,370 processor cycles + 81,320,128 bytes consed + +di 126 +Evaluation took: + 7.007 seconds of real time + 7.010000 seconds of total run time (6.830000 user, 0.180000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.440 seconds GC time, and 6.570 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 18,173,164,750 processor cycles + 1,222,908,480 bytes consed + +ek 127 +Evaluation took: + 0.481 seconds of real time + 0.470000 seconds of total run time (0.440000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.71% CPU + 1,245,647,403 processor cycles + 80,433,936 bytes consed + +di 127 +Evaluation took: + 6.670 seconds of real time + 6.670000 seconds of total run time (6.470000 user, 0.200000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.490 seconds GC time, and 6.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 17,297,833,618 processor cycles + 1,145,738,720 bytes consed + +ek 128 +Evaluation took: + 0.480 seconds of real time + 0.480000 seconds of total run time (0.480000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,245,436,556 processor cycles + 82,846,000 bytes consed + +di 128 +Evaluation took: + 7.436 seconds of real time + 7.430000 seconds of total run time (7.320000 user, 0.110000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.440 seconds GC time, and 6.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 19,283,884,802 processor cycles + 1,275,976,864 bytes consed + +ek 129 +Evaluation took: + 0.614 seconds of real time + 0.610000 seconds of total run time (0.520000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.170 seconds GC time, and 0.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.35% CPU + 1,592,080,906 processor cycles + 82,968,080 bytes consed + +di 129 +Evaluation took: + 7.237 seconds of real time + 7.230000 seconds of total run time (7.110000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.340 seconds GC time, and 6.890 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 18,768,553,674 processor cycles + 1,258,292,496 bytes consed + +ek 130 +Evaluation took: + 0.523 seconds of real time + 0.520000 seconds of total run time (0.490000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.43% CPU + 1,357,540,470 processor cycles + 84,216,544 bytes consed + +di 130 +Evaluation took: + 7.402 seconds of real time + 7.400000 seconds of total run time (7.280000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.420 seconds GC time, and 6.980 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 19,196,107,892 processor cycles + 1,266,567,904 bytes consed + +ek 131 +Evaluation took: + 0.515 seconds of real time + 0.510000 seconds of total run time (0.500000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.03% CPU + 1,334,484,112 processor cycles + 84,089,040 bytes consed + +di 131 +Evaluation took: + 7.506 seconds of real time + 7.500000 seconds of total run time (7.320000 user, 0.180000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.510 seconds GC time, and 6.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 19,467,023,862 processor cycles + 1,269,741,648 bytes consed + +ek 132 +Evaluation took: + 0.536 seconds of real time + 0.530000 seconds of total run time (0.490000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.440 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.88% CPU + 1,389,523,239 processor cycles + 85,877,696 bytes consed + +di 132 +Evaluation took: + 7.596 seconds of real time + 7.600000 seconds of total run time (7.440000 user, 0.160000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.350 seconds GC time, and 7.250 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.05% CPU + 19,700,605,067 processor cycles + 1,298,641,488 bytes consed + +ek 133 +Evaluation took: + 0.518 seconds of real time + 0.520000 seconds of total run time (0.500000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.39% CPU + 1,345,184,191 processor cycles + 87,428,688 bytes consed + +di 133 +Evaluation took: + 7.784 seconds of real time + 7.770000 seconds of total run time (7.580000 user, 0.190000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.470 seconds GC time, and 7.300 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.82% CPU + 20,188,152,296 processor cycles + 1,332,747,824 bytes consed + +ek 134 +Evaluation took: + 0.514 seconds of real time + 0.510000 seconds of total run time (0.510000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.22% CPU + 1,332,504,901 processor cycles + 87,118,176 bytes consed + +di 134 +Evaluation took: + 7.373 seconds of real time + 7.380000 seconds of total run time (7.250000 user, 0.130000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.380 seconds GC time, and 7.0000 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.09% CPU + 19,123,374,413 processor cycles + 1,254,537,456 bytes consed + +ek 135 +Evaluation took: + 0.534 seconds of real time + 0.540000 seconds of total run time (0.540000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.12% CPU + 1,384,291,831 processor cycles + 89,118,432 bytes consed + +di 135 +Evaluation took: + 8.059 seconds of real time + 8.050000 seconds of total run time (7.920000 user, 0.130000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.480 seconds GC time, and 7.570 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 20,901,360,922 processor cycles + 1,361,661,584 bytes consed + +ek 136 +Evaluation took: + 0.627 seconds of real time + 0.620000 seconds of total run time (0.580000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 0.500 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.88% CPU + 1,626,206,270 processor cycles + 89,969,984 bytes consed + +di 136 +Evaluation took: + 8.361 seconds of real time + 8.370000 seconds of total run time (8.210000 user, 0.160000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.440 seconds GC time, and 7.930 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.11% CPU + 21,685,159,028 processor cycles + 1,426,176,944 bytes consed + +ek 137 +Evaluation took: + 0.568 seconds of real time + 0.560000 seconds of total run time (0.540000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.59% CPU + 1,473,457,011 processor cycles + 92,612,464 bytes consed + +di 137 +Evaluation took: + 8.636 seconds of real time + 8.640000 seconds of total run time (8.430000 user, 0.210000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.680 seconds GC time, and 7.960 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.05% CPU + 22,398,795,133 processor cycles + 1,441,417,312 bytes consed + +ek 138 +Evaluation took: + 0.516 seconds of real time + 0.520000 seconds of total run time (0.480000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.490 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.78% CPU + 1,336,132,317 processor cycles + 90,848,368 bytes consed + +di 138 +Evaluation took: + 8.448 seconds of real time + 8.440000 seconds of total run time (8.260000 user, 0.180000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.480 seconds GC time, and 7.960 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.91% CPU + 21,908,783,468 processor cycles + 1,437,956,544 bytes consed + +ek 139 +Evaluation took: + 0.590 seconds of real time + 0.590000 seconds of total run time (0.550000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,529,271,120 processor cycles + 92,942,752 bytes consed + +di 139 +Evaluation took: + 8.262 seconds of real time + 8.260000 seconds of total run time (8.030000 user, 0.230000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.460 seconds GC time, and 7.800 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 21,427,787,134 processor cycles + 1,397,568,944 bytes consed + +ek 140 +Evaluation took: + 0.559 seconds of real time + 0.560000 seconds of total run time (0.530000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.18% CPU + 1,449,165,484 processor cycles + 91,985,984 bytes consed + +di 140 +Evaluation took: + 8.139 seconds of real time + 8.130000 seconds of total run time (7.880000 user, 0.250000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.540 seconds GC time, and 7.590 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 21,109,070,190 processor cycles + 1,369,210,160 bytes consed + +ek 141 +Evaluation took: + 0.609 seconds of real time + 0.610000 seconds of total run time (0.610000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.550 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.16% CPU + 1,578,206,968 processor cycles + 95,566,144 bytes consed + +di 141 +Evaluation took: + 8.986 seconds of real time + 8.980000 seconds of total run time (8.750000 user, 0.230000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.490 seconds GC time, and 8.490 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 23,303,659,678 processor cycles + 1,523,550,992 bytes consed + +ek 142 +Evaluation took: + 0.653 seconds of real time + 0.660000 seconds of total run time (0.630000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.570 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.07% CPU + 1,694,470,804 processor cycles + 97,827,120 bytes consed + +di 142 +Evaluation took: + 9.477 seconds of real time + 9.470000 seconds of total run time (9.280000 user, 0.190000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.660 seconds GC time, and 8.810 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 24,578,331,999 processor cycles + 1,571,752,272 bytes consed + +ek 143 +Evaluation took: + 0.586 seconds of real time + 0.580000 seconds of total run time (0.550000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.98% CPU + 1,519,286,847 processor cycles + 95,033,968 bytes consed + +di 143 +Evaluation took: + 8.921 seconds of real time + 8.920000 seconds of total run time (8.810000 user, 0.110000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.640 seconds GC time, and 8.280 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 23,135,724,638 processor cycles + 1,489,012,112 bytes consed + +ek 144 +Evaluation took: + 0.594 seconds of real time + 0.600000 seconds of total run time (0.590000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.550 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.01% CPU + 1,540,251,843 processor cycles + 93,937,760 bytes consed + +di 144 +Evaluation took: + 8.571 seconds of real time + 8.560000 seconds of total run time (8.250000 user, 0.310000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.520 seconds GC time, and 8.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 22,227,859,667 processor cycles + 1,433,457,984 bytes consed + +ek 145 +Evaluation took: + 0.592 seconds of real time + 0.590000 seconds of total run time (0.580000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.66% CPU + 1,534,816,790 processor cycles + 93,681,168 bytes consed + +di 145 +Evaluation took: + 8.151 seconds of real time + 8.150000 seconds of total run time (8.020000 user, 0.130000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.530 seconds GC time, and 7.620 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 21,139,812,824 processor cycles + 1,382,030,656 bytes consed + +ek 146 +Evaluation took: + 0.588 seconds of real time + 0.580000 seconds of total run time (0.570000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.64% CPU + 1,526,492,851 processor cycles + 96,783,616 bytes consed + +di 146 +Evaluation took: + 8.802 seconds of real time + 8.800000 seconds of total run time (8.530000 user, 0.270000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.630 seconds GC time, and 8.170 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 22,828,778,752 processor cycles + 1,468,638,640 bytes consed + +ek 147 +Evaluation took: + 0.569 seconds of real time + 0.570000 seconds of total run time (0.540000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.18% CPU + 1,477,323,510 processor cycles + 95,601,344 bytes consed + +di 147 +Evaluation took: + 8.339 seconds of real time + 8.330000 seconds of total run time (8.210000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.550 seconds GC time, and 7.780 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 21,628,499,464 processor cycles + 1,403,773,664 bytes consed + +ek 148 +Evaluation took: + 0.604 seconds of real time + 0.600000 seconds of total run time (0.580000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.560 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.34% CPU + 1,566,333,535 processor cycles + 98,843,888 bytes consed + +di 148 +Evaluation took: + 8.965 seconds of real time + 8.970000 seconds of total run time (8.800000 user, 0.170000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.520 seconds GC time, and 8.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.06% CPU + 23,251,996,690 processor cycles + 1,505,334,320 bytes consed + +ek 149 +Evaluation took: + 0.591 seconds of real time + 0.590000 seconds of total run time (0.560000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.83% CPU + 1,532,882,117 processor cycles + 98,821,392 bytes consed + +di 149 +Evaluation took: + 9.280 seconds of real time + 9.270000 seconds of total run time (9.010000 user, 0.260000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.590 seconds GC time, and 8.680 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 24,067,833,491 processor cycles + 1,538,819,488 bytes consed + +ek 150 +Evaluation took: + 0.622 seconds of real time + 0.620000 seconds of total run time (0.580000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.68% CPU + 1,613,728,506 processor cycles + 98,740,192 bytes consed + +di 150 +Evaluation took: + 9.003 seconds of real time + 8.990000 seconds of total run time (8.760000 user, 0.230000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.660 seconds GC time, and 8.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.86% CPU + 23,351,177,616 processor cycles + 1,493,551,648 bytes consed + +ek 151 +Evaluation took: + 0.601 seconds of real time + 0.600000 seconds of total run time (0.560000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.83% CPU + 1,558,337,651 processor cycles + 97,632,576 bytes consed + +di 151 +Evaluation took: + 8.823 seconds of real time + 8.820000 seconds of total run time (8.560000 user, 0.260000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.690 seconds GC time, and 8.130 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 22,882,590,978 processor cycles + 1,444,863,280 bytes consed + +ek 152 +Evaluation took: + 0.624 seconds of real time + 0.620000 seconds of total run time (0.590000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.36% CPU + 1,618,713,187 processor cycles + 100,098,704 bytes consed + +di 152 +Evaluation took: + 9.192 seconds of real time + 9.190000 seconds of total run time (8.990000 user, 0.200000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.650 seconds GC time, and 8.540 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 23,839,097,477 processor cycles + 1,514,020,928 bytes consed + +ek 153 +Evaluation took: + 0.649 seconds of real time + 0.650000 seconds of total run time (0.620000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.570 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.15% CPU + 1,683,289,738 processor cycles + 103,313,072 bytes consed + +di 153 +Evaluation took: + 10.313 seconds of real time + 10.310000 seconds of total run time (10.040000 user, 0.270000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.850 seconds GC time, and 9.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 26,748,360,223 processor cycles + 1,667,957,456 bytes consed + +ek 154 +Evaluation took: + 0.650 seconds of real time + 0.650000 seconds of total run time (0.620000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 0.540 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,687,562,981 processor cycles + 102,004,400 bytes consed + +di 154 +Evaluation took: + 9.817 seconds of real time + 9.800000 seconds of total run time (9.500000 user, 0.300000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.560 seconds GC time, and 9.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.83% CPU + 25,460,078,930 processor cycles + 1,622,816,656 bytes consed + +ek 155 +Evaluation took: + 0.629 seconds of real time + 0.630000 seconds of total run time (0.630000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.590 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.16% CPU + 1,632,377,071 processor cycles + 103,304,640 bytes consed + +di 155 +Evaluation took: + 9.846 seconds of real time + 9.830000 seconds of total run time (9.580000 user, 0.250000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.720 seconds GC time, and 9.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.84% CPU + 25,535,612,778 processor cycles + 1,635,169,760 bytes consed + +ek 156 +Evaluation took: + 0.632 seconds of real time + 0.630000 seconds of total run time (0.620000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.570 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.68% CPU + 1,638,054,210 processor cycles + 102,942,480 bytes consed + +di 156 +Evaluation took: + 9.798 seconds of real time + 9.800000 seconds of total run time (9.560000 user, 0.240000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.790 seconds GC time, and 9.010 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.02% CPU + 25,409,307,105 processor cycles + 1,597,892,432 bytes consed + +ek 157 +Evaluation took: + 0.723 seconds of real time + 0.720000 seconds of total run time (0.690000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 0.620 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.59% CPU + 1,875,669,614 processor cycles + 108,230,016 bytes consed + +di 157 +Evaluation took: + 11.086 seconds of real time + 11.080000 seconds of total run time (10.760000 user, 0.320000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.710 seconds GC time, and 10.370 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 28,753,550,904 processor cycles + 1,831,842,208 bytes consed + +ek 158 +Evaluation took: + 0.668 seconds of real time + 0.670000 seconds of total run time (0.650000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.600 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.30% CPU + 1,730,801,397 processor cycles + 106,060,480 bytes consed + +di 158 +Evaluation took: + 10.238 seconds of real time + 10.230000 seconds of total run time (10.020000 user, 0.210000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.750 seconds GC time, and 9.480 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 26,552,358,456 processor cycles + 1,660,443,760 bytes consed + +ek 159 +Evaluation took: + 0.668 seconds of real time + 0.670000 seconds of total run time (0.650000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.590 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.30% CPU + 1,732,878,732 processor cycles + 107,320,800 bytes consed + +di 159 +Evaluation took: + 10.509 seconds of real time + 10.510000 seconds of total run time (10.270000 user, 0.240000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.760 seconds GC time, and 9.750 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.01% CPU + 27,257,123,374 processor cycles + 1,720,494,960 bytes consed + +ek 160 +Evaluation took: + 0.637 seconds of real time + 0.630000 seconds of total run time (0.620000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.90% CPU + 1,651,913,471 processor cycles + 105,423,888 bytes consed + +di 160 +Evaluation took: + 10.042 seconds of real time + 10.040000 seconds of total run time (9.740000 user, 0.300000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.720 seconds GC time, and 9.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 26,044,142,553 processor cycles + 1,637,919,376 bytes consed + +ek 161 +Evaluation took: + 0.628 seconds of real time + 0.630000 seconds of total run time (0.620000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.580 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.32% CPU + 1,630,254,587 processor cycles + 105,792,368 bytes consed + +di 161 +Evaluation took: + 9.913 seconds of real time + 9.900000 seconds of total run time (9.560000 user, 0.340000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.780 seconds GC time, and 9.120 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 25,710,026,212 processor cycles + 1,602,183,808 bytes consed + +ek 162 +Evaluation took: + 0.607 seconds of real time + 0.610000 seconds of total run time (0.600000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.590 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.49% CPU + 1,574,558,128 processor cycles + 105,931,712 bytes consed + +di 162 +Evaluation took: + 9.745 seconds of real time + 9.740000 seconds of total run time (9.420000 user, 0.320000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.690 seconds GC time, and 9.050 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 25,271,534,873 processor cycles + 1,588,102,464 bytes consed + +ek 163 +Evaluation took: + 0.677 seconds of real time + 0.670000 seconds of total run time (0.650000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.600 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.97% CPU + 1,754,558,988 processor cycles + 107,737,600 bytes consed + +di 163 +Evaluation took: + 10.351 seconds of real time + 10.340000 seconds of total run time (10.070000 user, 0.270000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.000 seconds GC time, and 9.340 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 26,844,178,790 processor cycles + 1,667,960,192 bytes consed + +ek 164 +Evaluation took: + 0.667 seconds of real time + 0.670000 seconds of total run time (0.660000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.590 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.45% CPU + 1,730,742,130 processor cycles + 108,425,952 bytes consed + +di 164 +Evaluation took: + 10.497 seconds of real time + 10.490000 seconds of total run time (10.200000 user, 0.290000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.650 seconds GC time, and 9.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 27,224,222,610 processor cycles + 1,722,343,456 bytes consed + +ek 165 +Evaluation took: + 0.645 seconds of real time + 0.640000 seconds of total run time (0.630000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.600 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.22% CPU + 1,674,302,435 processor cycles + 110,059,104 bytes consed + +di 165 +Evaluation took: + 9.890 seconds of real time + 9.890000 seconds of total run time (9.640000 user, 0.250000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.600 seconds GC time, and 9.290 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 25,650,482,897 processor cycles + 1,621,151,504 bytes consed + +ek 166 +Evaluation took: + 0.699 seconds of real time + 0.700000 seconds of total run time (0.690000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.14% CPU + 1,812,775,133 processor cycles + 112,393,696 bytes consed + +di 166 +Evaluation took: + 10.954 seconds of real time + 10.950000 seconds of total run time (10.660000 user, 0.290000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.760 seconds GC time, and 10.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 28,407,360,709 processor cycles + 1,766,964,368 bytes consed + +ek 167 +Evaluation took: + 0.681 seconds of real time + 0.680000 seconds of total run time (0.660000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.620 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.85% CPU + 1,766,566,893 processor cycles + 112,817,472 bytes consed + +di 167 +Evaluation took: + 10.943 seconds of real time + 10.930000 seconds of total run time (10.570000 user, 0.360000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.700 seconds GC time, and 10.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 28,380,982,812 processor cycles + 1,789,778,096 bytes consed + +ek 168 +Evaluation took: + 0.711 seconds of real time + 0.710000 seconds of total run time (0.680000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.86% CPU + 1,843,642,671 processor cycles + 115,464,320 bytes consed + +di 168 +Evaluation took: + 11.604 seconds of real time + 11.600000 seconds of total run time (11.200000 user, 0.400000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.770 seconds GC time, and 10.830 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 30,096,554,657 processor cycles + 1,893,704,608 bytes consed + +ek 169 +Evaluation took: + 0.759 seconds of real time + 0.760000 seconds of total run time (0.740000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 0.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.13% CPU + 1,966,864,315 processor cycles + 114,442,080 bytes consed + +di 169 +Evaluation took: + 10.953 seconds of real time + 10.950000 seconds of total run time (10.660000 user, 0.290000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.720 seconds GC time, and 10.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 28,405,736,801 processor cycles + 1,788,606,048 bytes consed + +ek 170 +Evaluation took: + 0.713 seconds of real time + 0.710000 seconds of total run time (0.670000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.680 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.58% CPU + 1,850,095,689 processor cycles + 116,646,576 bytes consed + +di 170 +Evaluation took: + 11.387 seconds of real time + 11.380000 seconds of total run time (11.050000 user, 0.330000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.730 seconds GC time, and 10.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 29,531,050,250 processor cycles + 1,851,522,944 bytes consed + +ek 171 +Evaluation took: + 0.707 seconds of real time + 0.710000 seconds of total run time (0.700000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.42% CPU + 1,834,889,433 processor cycles + 115,846,896 bytes consed + +di 171 +Evaluation took: + 11.344 seconds of real time + 11.340000 seconds of total run time (11.010000 user, 0.330000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.810 seconds GC time, and 10.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 29,420,951,573 processor cycles + 1,853,276,544 bytes consed + +ek 172 +Evaluation took: + 0.684 seconds of real time + 0.680000 seconds of total run time (0.650000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.42% CPU + 1,773,664,763 processor cycles + 114,853,952 bytes consed + +di 172 +Evaluation took: + 11.264 seconds of real time + 11.260000 seconds of total run time (10.960000 user, 0.300000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.700 seconds GC time, and 10.560 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 29,213,957,370 processor cycles + 1,853,363,360 bytes consed + +ek 173 +Evaluation took: + 0.771 seconds of real time + 0.770000 seconds of total run time (0.740000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.680 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 1,999,211,877 processor cycles + 120,722,512 bytes consed + +di 173 +Evaluation took: + 12.062 seconds of real time + 12.050000 seconds of total run time (11.670000 user, 0.380000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.750 seconds GC time, and 11.300 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 31,283,055,687 processor cycles + 1,952,952,176 bytes consed + +ek 174 +Evaluation took: + 0.741 seconds of real time + 0.740000 seconds of total run time (0.720000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 1,922,192,519 processor cycles + 119,259,648 bytes consed + +di 174 +Evaluation took: + 11.734 seconds of real time + 11.740000 seconds of total run time (11.590000 user, 0.150000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.900 seconds GC time, and 10.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.05% CPU + 30,432,472,928 processor cycles + 1,890,704,608 bytes consed + +ek 175 +Evaluation took: + 0.722 seconds of real time + 0.730000 seconds of total run time (0.700000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.680 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.11% CPU + 1,871,934,168 processor cycles + 118,700,672 bytes consed + +di 175 +Evaluation took: + 11.703 seconds of real time + 11.690000 seconds of total run time (11.440000 user, 0.250000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.830 seconds GC time, and 10.860 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 30,351,759,022 processor cycles + 1,882,882,592 bytes consed + +ek 176 +Evaluation took: + 0.692 seconds of real time + 0.690000 seconds of total run time (0.640000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.640 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.71% CPU + 1,792,924,731 processor cycles + 117,069,872 bytes consed + +di 176 +Evaluation took: + 11.002 seconds of real time + 11.0000000 seconds of total run time (10.660000 user, 0.340000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.760 seconds GC time, and 10.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 28,533,107,005 processor cycles + 1,790,064,832 bytes consed + +ek 177 +Evaluation took: + 0.816 seconds of real time + 0.810000 seconds of total run time (0.790000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 0.690 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.26% CPU + 2,116,035,012 processor cycles + 121,523,568 bytes consed + +di 177 +Evaluation took: + 12.270 seconds of real time + 12.270000 seconds of total run time (11.930000 user, 0.340000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.770 seconds GC time, and 11.500 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 31,823,694,981 processor cycles + 1,977,732,480 bytes consed + +ek 178 +Evaluation took: + 0.764 seconds of real time + 0.770000 seconds of total run time (0.760000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.710 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.79% CPU + 1,981,228,405 processor cycles + 121,357,088 bytes consed + +di 178 +Evaluation took: + 12.175 seconds of real time + 12.160000 seconds of total run time (11.900000 user, 0.260000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.800 seconds GC time, and 11.360 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 31,575,861,161 processor cycles + 1,971,436,368 bytes consed + +ek 179 +Evaluation took: + 0.763 seconds of real time + 0.770000 seconds of total run time (0.700000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 0.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.92% CPU + 1,979,247,244 processor cycles + 120,761,568 bytes consed + +di 179 +Evaluation took: + 12.052 seconds of real time + 12.040000 seconds of total run time (11.740000 user, 0.300000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.720 seconds GC time, and 11.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 31,254,871,856 processor cycles + 1,948,700,240 bytes consed + +ek 180 +Evaluation took: + 0.783 seconds of real time + 0.780000 seconds of total run time (0.770000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.760 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.62% CPU + 2,030,862,366 processor cycles + 124,917,904 bytes consed + +di 180 +Evaluation took: + 13.090 seconds of real time + 13.090000 seconds of total run time (12.730000 user, 0.360000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.900 seconds GC time, and 12.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 33,949,558,422 processor cycles + 2,118,947,440 bytes consed + +ek 181 +Evaluation took: + 0.826 seconds of real time + 0.820000 seconds of total run time (0.800000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.750 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.27% CPU + 2,142,432,461 processor cycles + 127,282,976 bytes consed + +di 181 +Evaluation took: + 13.339 seconds of real time + 13.340000 seconds of total run time (12.980000 user, 0.360000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.850 seconds GC time, and 12.490 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.01% CPU + 34,595,499,848 processor cycles + 2,137,925,872 bytes consed + +ek 182 +Evaluation took: + 0.787 seconds of real time + 0.790000 seconds of total run time (0.780000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.700 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.38% CPU + 2,040,291,175 processor cycles + 123,387,328 bytes consed + +di 182 +Evaluation took: + 11.851 seconds of real time + 11.840000 seconds of total run time (11.530000 user, 0.310000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.870 seconds GC time, and 10.970 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.91% CPU + 30,735,753,802 processor cycles + 1,914,780,032 bytes consed + +ek 183 +Evaluation took: + 0.788 seconds of real time + 0.790000 seconds of total run time (0.780000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.700 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.25% CPU + 2,044,734,263 processor cycles + 123,870,992 bytes consed + +di 183 +Evaluation took: + 12.447 seconds of real time + 12.430000 seconds of total run time (12.030000 user, 0.400000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.790 seconds GC time, and 11.640 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.86% CPU + 32,280,421,043 processor cycles + 1,990,893,040 bytes consed + +ek 184 +Evaluation took: + 0.736 seconds of real time + 0.740000 seconds of total run time (0.740000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.54% CPU + 1,908,890,555 processor cycles + 121,564,096 bytes consed + +di 184 +Evaluation took: + 11.455 seconds of real time + 11.440000 seconds of total run time (11.150000 user, 0.290000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.850 seconds GC time, and 10.590 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.87% CPU + 29,706,484,392 processor cycles + 1,854,825,904 bytes consed + +ek 185 +Evaluation took: + 0.744 seconds of real time + 0.740000 seconds of total run time (0.700000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.46% CPU + 1,930,562,738 processor cycles + 123,617,600 bytes consed + +di 185 +Evaluation took: + 12.188 seconds of real time + 12.180000 seconds of total run time (11.840000 user, 0.340000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.830 seconds GC time, and 11.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 31,610,238,998 processor cycles + 1,963,788,736 bytes consed + +ek 186 +Evaluation took: + 0.744 seconds of real time + 0.740000 seconds of total run time (0.730000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.690 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.46% CPU + 1,927,310,957 processor cycles + 125,314,720 bytes consed + +di 186 +Evaluation took: + 12.033 seconds of real time + 12.040000 seconds of total run time (11.770000 user, 0.270000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.810 seconds GC time, and 11.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.06% CPU + 31,206,510,751 processor cycles + 1,935,165,536 bytes consed + +ek 187 +Evaluation took: + 0.840 seconds of real time + 0.840000 seconds of total run time (0.790000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 0.740 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 2,179,004,204 processor cycles + 128,899,216 bytes consed + +di 187 +Evaluation took: + 13.123 seconds of real time + 13.120000 seconds of total run time (12.840000 user, 0.280000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.900 seconds GC time, and 12.220 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 34,036,021,695 processor cycles + 2,113,569,472 bytes consed + +ek 188 +Evaluation took: + 0.819 seconds of real time + 0.810000 seconds of total run time (0.780000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.160 seconds GC time, and 0.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.90% CPU + 2,122,920,371 processor cycles + 125,030,752 bytes consed + +di 188 +Evaluation took: + 11.849 seconds of real time + 11.840000 seconds of total run time (11.540000 user, 0.300000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.740 seconds GC time, and 11.100 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 30,729,022,935 processor cycles + 1,916,791,648 bytes consed + +ek 189 +Evaluation took: + 0.803 seconds of real time + 0.800000 seconds of total run time (0.790000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.730 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.63% CPU + 2,086,218,914 processor cycles + 129,037,008 bytes consed + +di 189 +Evaluation took: + 12.990 seconds of real time + 12.980000 seconds of total run time (12.610000 user, 0.370000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.960 seconds GC time, and 12.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 33,687,766,112 processor cycles + 2,081,301,776 bytes consed + +ek 190 +Evaluation took: + 0.880 seconds of real time + 0.880000 seconds of total run time (0.840000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.810 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 2,283,239,556 processor cycles + 132,603,136 bytes consed + +di 190 +Evaluation took: + 13.372 seconds of real time + 13.360000 seconds of total run time (12.950000 user, 0.410000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.950 seconds GC time, and 12.410 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.91% CPU + 34,681,034,063 processor cycles + 2,138,872,480 bytes consed + +ek 191 +Evaluation took: + 0.859 seconds of real time + 0.860000 seconds of total run time (0.850000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.780 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.12% CPU + 2,228,767,190 processor cycles + 132,178,512 bytes consed + +di 191 +Evaluation took: + 13.813 seconds of real time + 13.800000 seconds of total run time (13.520000 user, 0.280000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.950 seconds GC time, and 12.850 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.91% CPU + 35,825,575,409 processor cycles + 2,190,840,400 bytes consed + +ek 192 +Evaluation took: + 0.833 seconds of real time + 0.830000 seconds of total run time (0.810000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.750 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.64% CPU + 2,160,486,679 processor cycles + 132,659,008 bytes consed + +di 192 +Evaluation took: + 13.841 seconds of real time + 13.840000 seconds of total run time (13.440000 user, 0.400000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.060 seconds GC time, and 12.780 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 35,897,003,831 processor cycles + 2,170,044,448 bytes consed + +ek 193 +Evaluation took: + 0.834 seconds of real time + 0.830000 seconds of total run time (0.820000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 0.730 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.52% CPU + 2,165,015,983 processor cycles + 132,034,832 bytes consed + +di 193 +Evaluation took: + 13.001 seconds of real time + 12.990000 seconds of total run time (12.550000 user, 0.440000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.090 seconds GC time, and 11.900 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 33,718,582,105 processor cycles + 2,066,936,800 bytes consed + +ek 194 +Evaluation took: + 0.780 seconds of real time + 0.780000 seconds of total run time (0.770000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.720 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 2,023,166,730 processor cycles + 130,936,624 bytes consed + +di 194 +Evaluation took: + 12.562 seconds of real time + 12.560000 seconds of total run time (12.160000 user, 0.400000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.850 seconds GC time, and 11.710 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 32,581,485,781 processor cycles + 1,995,936,896 bytes consed + +ek 195 +Evaluation took: + 0.802 seconds of real time + 0.800000 seconds of total run time (0.740000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.720 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.75% CPU + 2,079,581,205 processor cycles + 130,697,696 bytes consed + +di 195 +Evaluation took: + 12.990 seconds of real time + 12.980000 seconds of total run time (12.500000 user, 0.480000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.030 seconds GC time, and 11.950 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 33,688,426,707 processor cycles + 2,051,484,208 bytes consed + +ek 196 +Evaluation took: + 0.822 seconds of real time + 0.820000 seconds of total run time (0.790000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.760 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.76% CPU + 2,130,789,232 processor cycles + 132,268,272 bytes consed + +di 196 +Evaluation took: + 13.065 seconds of real time + 13.060000 seconds of total run time (12.620000 user, 0.440000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.860 seconds GC time, and 12.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 33,883,779,085 processor cycles + 2,086,619,472 bytes consed + +ek 197 +Evaluation took: + 0.814 seconds of real time + 0.810000 seconds of total run time (0.810000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.740 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.51% CPU + 2,111,118,438 processor cycles + 133,508,576 bytes consed + +di 197 +Evaluation took: + 13.740 seconds of real time + 13.730000 seconds of total run time (13.380000 user, 0.350000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.020 seconds GC time, and 12.710 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 35,632,935,442 processor cycles + 2,149,555,728 bytes consed + +ek 198 +Evaluation took: + 0.893 seconds of real time + 0.900000 seconds of total run time (0.830000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 0.780 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.78% CPU + 2,315,117,194 processor cycles + 136,541,520 bytes consed + +di 198 +Evaluation took: + 14.170 seconds of real time + 14.160000 seconds of total run time (13.760000 user, 0.400000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.140 seconds GC time, and 13.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 36,750,290,148 processor cycles + 2,218,853,552 bytes consed + +ek 199 +Evaluation took: + 0.879 seconds of real time + 0.880000 seconds of total run time (0.840000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.790 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.11% CPU + 2,279,107,701 processor cycles + 136,809,104 bytes consed + +di 199 +Evaluation took: + 14.074 seconds of real time + 14.060000 seconds of total run time (13.590000 user, 0.470000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.380 seconds GC time, and 12.680 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 36,501,380,474 processor cycles + 2,153,399,824 bytes consed + +ek 200 +Evaluation took: + 0.816 seconds of real time + 0.820000 seconds of total run time (0.800000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.760 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.49% CPU + 2,114,574,969 processor cycles + 134,813,120 bytes consed + +di 200 +Evaluation took: + 13.211 seconds of real time + 13.200000 seconds of total run time (12.870000 user, 0.330000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.930 seconds GC time, and 12.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 34,263,369,777 processor cycles + 2,086,214,816 bytes consed + +NIL +* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/2106-stat b/2106-stat new file mode 100644 index 0000000..12a121a --- /dev/null +++ b/2106-stat @@ -0,0 +1,2648 @@ +This is SBCL 1.0.40.0.debian, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. +More information about SBCL is available at . + +SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. +It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under +BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the +distribution for more information. +* +T +* +ek 3 +Evaluation took: + 0.000 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 576,173 processor cycles + 138,720 bytes consed + +di 3 +Evaluation took: + 0.000 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 738,842 processor cycles + 192,176 bytes consed + +ek 4 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 1,275,352 processor cycles + 253,040 bytes consed + +di 4 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 2,806,856 processor cycles + 554,192 bytes consed + +ek 5 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 2,546,024 processor cycles + 451,632 bytes consed + +di 5 +Evaluation took: + 0.008 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 125.00% CPU + 19,513,364 processor cycles + 1,094,256 bytes consed + +ek 6 +Evaluation took: + 0.001 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 4,063,527 processor cycles + 670,656 bytes consed + +di 6 +Evaluation took: + 0.005 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 200.00% CPU + 12,476,490 processor cycles + 1,973,952 bytes consed + +ek 7 +Evaluation took: + 0.003 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 333.33% CPU + 6,246,175 processor cycles + 984,512 bytes consed + +di 7 +Evaluation took: + 0.009 seconds of real time + 0.000000 seconds of total run time (0.000000 user, 0.000000 system) + 0.00% CPU + 22,143,316 processor cycles + 3,252,400 bytes consed + +ek 8 +Evaluation took: + 0.004 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 250.00% CPU + 8,956,012 processor cycles + 1,344,000 bytes consed + +di 8 +Evaluation took: + 0.017 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 58.82% CPU + 44,390,346 processor cycles + 5,526,816 bytes consed + +ek 9 +Evaluation took: + 0.004 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 250.00% CPU + 11,581,843 processor cycles + 1,726,448 bytes consed + +di 9 +Evaluation took: + 0.034 seconds of real time + 0.030000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 88.24% CPU + 88,884,991 processor cycles + 7,905,152 bytes consed + +ek 10 +Evaluation took: + 0.007 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 142.86% CPU + 17,436,874 processor cycles + 2,147,216 bytes consed + +di 10 +Evaluation took: + 0.040 seconds of real time + 0.040000 seconds of total run time (0.040000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 103,141,207 processor cycles + 11,232,736 bytes consed + +ek 11 +Evaluation took: + 0.008 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 125.00% CPU + 20,424,326 processor cycles + 2,710,640 bytes consed + +di 11 +Evaluation took: + 0.053 seconds of real time + 0.060000 seconds of total run time (0.060000 user, 0.000000 system) + 113.21% CPU + 137,237,776 processor cycles + 15,751,728 bytes consed + +ek 12 +Evaluation took: + 0.009 seconds of real time + 0.010000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.000000 system) + 111.11% CPU + 24,564,800 processor cycles + 3,221,392 bytes consed + +di 12 +Evaluation took: + 0.076 seconds of real time + 0.080000 seconds of total run time (0.080000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 105.26% CPU + 198,082,183 processor cycles + 21,026,224 bytes consed + +ek 13 +Evaluation took: + 0.021 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.010000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.010 seconds non-GC time. ] + 95.24% CPU + 53,896,102 processor cycles + 3,783,552 bytes consed + +di 13 +Evaluation took: + 0.096 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.080000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 93.75% CPU + 246,640,134 processor cycles + 25,197,840 bytes consed + +ek 14 +Evaluation took: + 0.014 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 142.86% CPU + 36,652,590 processor cycles + 4,381,760 bytes consed + +di 14 +Evaluation took: + 0.124 seconds of real time + 0.120000 seconds of total run time (0.120000 user, 0.000000 system) + 96.77% CPU + 320,022,872 processor cycles + 31,678,992 bytes consed + +ek 15 +Evaluation took: + 0.019 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.010 seconds non-GC time. ] + 105.26% CPU + 50,024,052 processor cycles + 4,958,688 bytes consed + +di 15 +Evaluation took: + 0.161 seconds of real time + 0.160000 seconds of total run time (0.150000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.38% CPU + 418,121,847 processor cycles + 39,744,624 bytes consed + +ek 16 +Evaluation took: + 0.023 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 86.96% CPU + 57,903,313 processor cycles + 5,659,984 bytes consed + +di 16 +Evaluation took: + 0.186 seconds of real time + 0.180000 seconds of total run time (0.180000 user, 0.000000 system) + 96.77% CPU + 480,410,801 processor cycles + 47,079,264 bytes consed + +ek 17 +Evaluation took: + 0.024 seconds of real time + 0.020000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.000000 system) + 83.33% CPU + 61,966,320 processor cycles + 6,390,256 bytes consed + +di 17 +Evaluation took: + 0.245 seconds of real time + 0.250000 seconds of total run time (0.240000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.04% CPU + 635,255,959 processor cycles + 57,370,656 bytes consed + +ek 18 +Evaluation took: + 0.027 seconds of real time + 0.030000 seconds of total run time (0.020000 user, 0.010000 system) + 111.11% CPU + 71,833,385 processor cycles + 7,177,648 bytes consed + +di 18 +Evaluation took: + 0.290 seconds of real time + 0.290000 seconds of total run time (0.290000 user, 0.000000 system) + 100.00% CPU + 751,917,530 processor cycles + 67,955,328 bytes consed + +ek 19 +Evaluation took: + 0.033 seconds of real time + 0.030000 seconds of total run time (0.030000 user, 0.000000 system) + 90.91% CPU + 86,946,002 processor cycles + 8,031,664 bytes consed + +di 19 +Evaluation took: + 0.377 seconds of real time + 0.380000 seconds of total run time (0.380000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.360 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.80% CPU + 978,023,202 processor cycles + 81,646,784 bytes consed + +ek 20 +Evaluation took: + 0.037 seconds of real time + 0.030000 seconds of total run time (0.030000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.020 seconds non-GC time. ] + 81.08% CPU + 95,329,052 processor cycles + 8,629,472 bytes consed + +di 20 +Evaluation took: + 0.423 seconds of real time + 0.430000 seconds of total run time (0.400000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.410 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.65% CPU + 1,096,665,986 processor cycles + 91,793,424 bytes consed + +ek 21 +Evaluation took: + 0.050 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.030 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 129,155,780 processor cycles + 9,555,856 bytes consed + +di 21 +Evaluation took: + 0.479 seconds of real time + 0.480000 seconds of total run time (0.480000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.21% CPU + 1,241,591,013 processor cycles + 106,081,408 bytes consed + +ek 22 +Evaluation took: + 0.046 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 108.70% CPU + 119,553,044 processor cycles + 10,387,664 bytes consed + +di 22 +Evaluation took: + 0.554 seconds of real time + 0.550000 seconds of total run time (0.530000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.28% CPU + 1,437,289,347 processor cycles + 119,197,056 bytes consed + +ek 23 +Evaluation took: + 0.048 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 104.17% CPU + 126,098,973 processor cycles + 11,296,400 bytes consed + +di 23 +Evaluation took: + 0.648 seconds of real time + 0.640000 seconds of total run time (0.620000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.610 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.77% CPU + 1,681,558,424 processor cycles + 136,050,624 bytes consed + +ek 24 +Evaluation took: + 0.055 seconds of real time + 0.050000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 90.91% CPU + 141,342,487 processor cycles + 12,069,296 bytes consed + +di 24 +Evaluation took: + 0.704 seconds of real time + 0.700000 seconds of total run time (0.680000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.43% CPU + 1,824,266,860 processor cycles + 149,721,584 bytes consed + +ek 25 +Evaluation took: + 0.072 seconds of real time + 0.070000 seconds of total run time (0.060000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.22% CPU + 185,308,825 processor cycles + 13,171,232 bytes consed + +di 25 +Evaluation took: + 0.798 seconds of real time + 0.800000 seconds of total run time (0.800000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.780 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.25% CPU + 2,068,176,630 processor cycles + 169,706,992 bytes consed + +ek 26 +Evaluation took: + 0.064 seconds of real time + 0.060000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.050 seconds non-GC time. ] + 93.75% CPU + 165,922,991 processor cycles + 13,847,600 bytes consed + +di 26 +Evaluation took: + 0.847 seconds of real time + 0.840000 seconds of total run time (0.840000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.820 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.17% CPU + 2,197,893,464 processor cycles + 175,670,992 bytes consed + +ek 27 +Evaluation took: + 0.084 seconds of real time + 0.080000 seconds of total run time (0.050000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 95.24% CPU + 218,220,600 processor cycles + 14,851,680 bytes consed + +di 27 +Evaluation took: + 0.980 seconds of real time + 0.980000 seconds of total run time (0.980000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.970 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 2,542,228,910 processor cycles + 201,326,880 bytes consed + +ek 28 +Evaluation took: + 0.071 seconds of real time + 0.070000 seconds of total run time (0.070000 user, 0.000000 system) + 98.59% CPU + 183,834,235 processor cycles + 16,277,600 bytes consed + +di 28 +Evaluation took: + 1.160 seconds of real time + 1.160000 seconds of total run time (1.120000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 1.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 3,010,577,869 processor cycles + 231,137,200 bytes consed + +ek 29 +Evaluation took: + 0.080 seconds of real time + 0.070000 seconds of total run time (0.060000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 87.50% CPU + 206,757,005 processor cycles + 16,818,992 bytes consed + +di 29 +Evaluation took: + 1.191 seconds of real time + 1.200000 seconds of total run time (1.180000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 1.170 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.76% CPU + 3,088,813,416 processor cycles + 237,004,160 bytes consed + +ek 30 +Evaluation took: + 0.090 seconds of real time + 0.090000 seconds of total run time (0.090000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.080 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 232,288,017 processor cycles + 17,779,696 bytes consed + +di 30 +Evaluation took: + 1.283 seconds of real time + 1.290000 seconds of total run time (1.280000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 1.250 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.55% CPU + 3,324,953,359 processor cycles + 252,792,960 bytes consed + +ek 31 +Evaluation took: + 0.135 seconds of real time + 0.140000 seconds of total run time (0.130000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 103.70% CPU + 350,651,951 processor cycles + 18,993,072 bytes consed + +di 31 +Evaluation took: + 1.454 seconds of real time + 1.450000 seconds of total run time (1.440000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 1.420 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.72% CPU + 3,772,666,638 processor cycles + 284,697,632 bytes consed + +ek 32 +Evaluation took: + 0.121 seconds of real time + 0.120000 seconds of total run time (0.110000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.17% CPU + 313,933,048 processor cycles + 20,147,776 bytes consed + +di 32 +Evaluation took: + 1.575 seconds of real time + 1.560000 seconds of total run time (1.550000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 1.540 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.05% CPU + 4,084,422,823 processor cycles + 304,445,856 bytes consed + +ek 33 +Evaluation took: + 0.096 seconds of real time + 0.100000 seconds of total run time (0.090000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 104.17% CPU + 248,922,297 processor cycles + 20,499,632 bytes consed + +di 33 +Evaluation took: + 1.581 seconds of real time + 1.580000 seconds of total run time (1.570000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 1.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 4,101,740,123 processor cycles + 301,150,096 bytes consed + +ek 34 +Evaluation took: + 0.115 seconds of real time + 0.110000 seconds of total run time (0.110000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.100 seconds non-GC time. ] + 95.65% CPU + 298,473,747 processor cycles + 22,117,968 bytes consed + +di 34 +Evaluation took: + 1.905 seconds of real time + 1.910000 seconds of total run time (1.860000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 1.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.26% CPU + 4,939,669,033 processor cycles + 357,045,760 bytes consed + +ek 35 +Evaluation took: + 0.124 seconds of real time + 0.120000 seconds of total run time (0.120000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 96.77% CPU + 321,060,324 processor cycles + 23,283,712 bytes consed + +di 35 +Evaluation took: + 2.015 seconds of real time + 2.010000 seconds of total run time (2.0000000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 1.920 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.75% CPU + 5,227,435,109 processor cycles + 371,769,200 bytes consed + +ek 36 +Evaluation took: + 0.121 seconds of real time + 0.120000 seconds of total run time (0.120000 user, 0.000000 system) + 99.17% CPU + 314,839,070 processor cycles + 24,115,680 bytes consed + +di 36 +Evaluation took: + 2.229 seconds of real time + 2.230000 seconds of total run time (2.220000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 2.140 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 5,782,031,268 processor cycles + 407,555,824 bytes consed + +ek 37 +Evaluation took: + 0.140 seconds of real time + 0.140000 seconds of total run time (0.130000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.120 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 362,641,903 processor cycles + 25,890,976 bytes consed + +di 37 +Evaluation took: + 2.481 seconds of real time + 2.470000 seconds of total run time (2.440000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 2.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.56% CPU + 6,434,293,242 processor cycles + 447,448,688 bytes consed + +ek 38 +Evaluation took: + 0.142 seconds of real time + 0.150000 seconds of total run time (0.150000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.130 seconds non-GC time. ] + 105.63% CPU + 368,719,598 processor cycles + 26,614,672 bytes consed + +di 38 +Evaluation took: + 2.543 seconds of real time + 2.540000 seconds of total run time (2.520000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 2.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 6,595,572,581 processor cycles + 454,963,696 bytes consed + +ek 39 +Evaluation took: + 0.145 seconds of real time + 0.140000 seconds of total run time (0.130000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.130 seconds non-GC time. ] + 96.55% CPU + 376,840,217 processor cycles + 27,725,472 bytes consed + +di 39 +Evaluation took: + 2.753 seconds of real time + 2.760000 seconds of total run time (2.730000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 2.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.25% CPU + 7,141,242,615 processor cycles + 484,057,840 bytes consed + +ek 40 +Evaluation took: + 0.167 seconds of real time + 0.170000 seconds of total run time (0.160000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.140 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.80% CPU + 434,050,227 processor cycles + 28,496,912 bytes consed + +di 40 +Evaluation took: + 2.868 seconds of real time + 2.870000 seconds of total run time (2.850000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 2.800 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.07% CPU + 7,436,820,105 processor cycles + 503,286,608 bytes consed + +ek 41 +Evaluation took: + 0.185 seconds of real time + 0.180000 seconds of total run time (0.170000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.30% CPU + 477,785,958 processor cycles + 30,108,544 bytes consed + +di 41 +Evaluation took: + 3.204 seconds of real time + 3.210000 seconds of total run time (3.170000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 3.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.19% CPU + 8,309,816,723 processor cycles + 547,396,496 bytes consed + +ek 42 +Evaluation took: + 0.205 seconds of real time + 0.200000 seconds of total run time (0.180000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.56% CPU + 529,520,563 processor cycles + 31,665,728 bytes consed + +di 42 +Evaluation took: + 3.469 seconds of real time + 3.460000 seconds of total run time (3.410000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 3.370 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.74% CPU + 8,997,376,219 processor cycles + 597,261,408 bytes consed + +ek 43 +Evaluation took: + 0.200 seconds of real time + 0.200000 seconds of total run time (0.190000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.160 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 518,255,153 processor cycles + 32,754,688 bytes consed + +di 43 +Evaluation took: + 3.572 seconds of real time + 3.560000 seconds of total run time (3.550000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 3.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.66% CPU + 9,264,498,581 processor cycles + 612,174,416 bytes consed + +ek 44 +Evaluation took: + 0.235 seconds of real time + 0.230000 seconds of total run time (0.230000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.87% CPU + 607,963,733 processor cycles + 33,439,744 bytes consed + +di 44 +Evaluation took: + 3.696 seconds of real time + 3.690000 seconds of total run time (3.660000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 3.610 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.84% CPU + 9,586,225,441 processor cycles + 627,597,440 bytes consed + +ek 45 +Evaluation took: + 0.208 seconds of real time + 0.210000 seconds of total run time (0.210000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.96% CPU + 539,007,300 processor cycles + 34,558,992 bytes consed + +di 45 +Evaluation took: + 3.881 seconds of real time + 3.880000 seconds of total run time (3.840000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 3.740 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 10,065,086,694 processor cycles + 654,514,864 bytes consed + +ek 46 +Evaluation took: + 0.229 seconds of real time + 0.230000 seconds of total run time (0.200000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.44% CPU + 593,425,560 processor cycles + 35,916,848 bytes consed + +di 46 +Evaluation took: + 4.036 seconds of real time + 4.030000 seconds of total run time (3.960000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.150 seconds GC time, and 3.880 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.85% CPU + 10,466,528,488 processor cycles + 675,197,696 bytes consed + +ek 47 +Evaluation took: + 0.236 seconds of real time + 0.240000 seconds of total run time (0.230000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.69% CPU + 611,677,989 processor cycles + 37,180,944 bytes consed + +di 47 +Evaluation took: + 4.153 seconds of real time + 4.150000 seconds of total run time (4.070000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 4.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 10,769,337,085 processor cycles + 688,248,960 bytes consed + +ek 48 +Evaluation took: + 0.296 seconds of real time + 0.290000 seconds of total run time (0.260000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 97.97% CPU + 768,292,447 processor cycles + 38,453,504 bytes consed + +di 48 +Evaluation took: + 4.490 seconds of real time + 4.480000 seconds of total run time (4.460000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 4.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.78% CPU + 11,643,952,346 processor cycles + 748,439,824 bytes consed + +ek 49 +Evaluation took: + 0.248 seconds of real time + 0.250000 seconds of total run time (0.240000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.020 seconds GC time, and 0.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.81% CPU + 643,351,774 processor cycles + 39,884,560 bytes consed + +di 49 +Evaluation took: + 4.831 seconds of real time + 4.830000 seconds of total run time (4.800000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 4.730 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 12,530,143,067 processor cycles + 790,584,848 bytes consed + +ek 50 +Evaluation took: + 0.265 seconds of real time + 0.260000 seconds of total run time (0.250000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.210 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.11% CPU + 687,239,917 processor cycles + 40,877,696 bytes consed + +di 50 +Evaluation took: + 5.117 seconds of real time + 5.120000 seconds of total run time (5.090000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 4.980 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.06% CPU + 13,272,696,606 processor cycles + 829,314,144 bytes consed + +ek 51 +Evaluation took: + 0.259 seconds of real time + 0.260000 seconds of total run time (0.240000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.210 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.39% CPU + 672,220,770 processor cycles + 41,621,696 bytes consed + +di 51 +Evaluation took: + 5.086 seconds of real time + 5.090000 seconds of total run time (5.010000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 4.950 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.08% CPU + 13,191,836,476 processor cycles + 824,577,376 bytes consed + +ek 52 +Evaluation took: + 0.276 seconds of real time + 0.280000 seconds of total run time (0.280000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.45% CPU + 715,684,892 processor cycles + 42,466,208 bytes consed + +di 52 +Evaluation took: + 5.006 seconds of real time + 4.990000 seconds of total run time (4.930000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.150 seconds GC time, and 4.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.68% CPU + 12,982,178,495 processor cycles + 808,378,816 bytes consed + +ek 53 +Evaluation took: + 0.279 seconds of real time + 0.280000 seconds of total run time (0.270000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.36% CPU + 724,100,689 processor cycles + 44,548,816 bytes consed + +di 53 +Evaluation took: + 5.607 seconds of real time + 5.600000 seconds of total run time (5.560000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.170 seconds GC time, and 5.430 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 14,543,327,045 processor cycles + 895,429,040 bytes consed + +ek 54 +Evaluation took: + 0.301 seconds of real time + 0.300000 seconds of total run time (0.300000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.67% CPU + 780,703,651 processor cycles + 46,466,832 bytes consed + +di 54 +Evaluation took: + 6.162 seconds of real time + 6.160000 seconds of total run time (6.110000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.190 seconds GC time, and 5.970 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 15,981,540,705 processor cycles + 975,795,072 bytes consed + +ek 55 +Evaluation took: + 0.316 seconds of real time + 0.310000 seconds of total run time (0.310000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.10% CPU + 817,859,055 processor cycles + 47,210,768 bytes consed + +di 55 +Evaluation took: + 6.121 seconds of real time + 6.120000 seconds of total run time (6.040000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.280 seconds GC time, and 5.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 15,872,907,687 processor cycles + 964,582,032 bytes consed + +ek 56 +Evaluation took: + 0.323 seconds of real time + 0.320000 seconds of total run time (0.320000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.07% CPU + 836,836,520 processor cycles + 48,465,136 bytes consed + +di 56 +Evaluation took: + 6.667 seconds of real time + 6.660000 seconds of total run time (6.580000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.150 seconds GC time, and 6.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 17,292,141,347 processor cycles + 1,040,988,560 bytes consed + +ek 57 +Evaluation took: + 0.319 seconds of real time + 0.320000 seconds of total run time (0.290000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.290 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.31% CPU + 828,418,903 processor cycles + 49,870,912 bytes consed + +di 57 +Evaluation took: + 6.635 seconds of real time + 6.630000 seconds of total run time (6.570000 user, 0.060000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.200 seconds GC time, and 6.430 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 17,208,537,801 processor cycles + 1,041,279,840 bytes consed + +ek 58 +Evaluation took: + 0.342 seconds of real time + 0.350000 seconds of total run time (0.330000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.310 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.34% CPU + 888,313,738 processor cycles + 51,412,912 bytes consed + +di 58 +Evaluation took: + 7.266 seconds of real time + 7.250000 seconds of total run time (7.220000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.250 seconds GC time, and 7.0000 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.78% CPU + 18,845,915,387 processor cycles + 1,117,222,288 bytes consed + +ek 59 +Evaluation took: + 0.351 seconds of real time + 0.360000 seconds of total run time (0.350000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.310 seconds non-GC time. ] + 102.56% CPU + 912,387,970 processor cycles + 52,292,240 bytes consed + +di 59 +Evaluation took: + 7.363 seconds of real time + 7.360000 seconds of total run time (7.260000 user, 0.100000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.360 seconds GC time, and 7.0000 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 19,096,558,104 processor cycles + 1,129,302,992 bytes consed + +ek 60 +Evaluation took: + 0.348 seconds of real time + 0.350000 seconds of total run time (0.320000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.290 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.57% CPU + 902,624,918 processor cycles + 52,324,048 bytes consed + +di 60 +Evaluation took: + 6.978 seconds of real time + 6.960000 seconds of total run time (6.840000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.260 seconds GC time, and 6.700 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.74% CPU + 18,098,784,509 processor cycles + 1,075,051,248 bytes consed + +ek 61 +Evaluation took: + 0.381 seconds of real time + 0.380000 seconds of total run time (0.370000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.74% CPU + 988,638,742 processor cycles + 55,327,920 bytes consed + +di 61 +Evaluation took: + 8.115 seconds of real time + 8.110000 seconds of total run time (8.020000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.290 seconds GC time, and 7.820 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 21,045,419,395 processor cycles + 1,232,337,776 bytes consed + +ek 62 +Evaluation took: + 0.493 seconds of real time + 0.490000 seconds of total run time (0.440000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.160 seconds GC time, and 0.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.39% CPU + 1,276,999,802 processor cycles + 56,985,808 bytes consed + +di 62 +Evaluation took: + 8.228 seconds of real time + 8.220000 seconds of total run time (8.120000 user, 0.100000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.230 seconds GC time, and 7.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 21,337,031,950 processor cycles + 1,258,867,648 bytes consed + +ek 63 +Evaluation took: + 0.379 seconds of real time + 0.380000 seconds of total run time (0.360000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.26% CPU + 984,368,853 processor cycles + 57,056,176 bytes consed + +di 63 +Evaluation took: + 7.978 seconds of real time + 7.980000 seconds of total run time (7.810000 user, 0.170000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.270 seconds GC time, and 7.710 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.03% CPU + 20,690,886,320 processor cycles + 1,210,788,144 bytes consed + +ek 64 +Evaluation took: + 0.352 seconds of real time + 0.350000 seconds of total run time (0.350000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.340 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.43% CPU + 914,603,547 processor cycles + 58,774,128 bytes consed + +di 64 +Evaluation took: + 8.669 seconds of real time + 8.660000 seconds of total run time (8.540000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.330 seconds GC time, and 8.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 22,484,036,328 processor cycles + 1,307,130,464 bytes consed + +ek 65 +Evaluation took: + 0.409 seconds of real time + 0.410000 seconds of total run time (0.400000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.340 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.24% CPU + 1,060,504,523 processor cycles + 59,640,272 bytes consed + +di 65 +Evaluation took: + 8.741 seconds of real time + 8.740000 seconds of total run time (8.590000 user, 0.150000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.370 seconds GC time, and 8.370 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 22,668,932,026 processor cycles + 1,316,286,128 bytes consed + +ek 66 +Evaluation took: + 0.406 seconds of real time + 0.410000 seconds of total run time (0.410000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.99% CPU + 1,051,704,030 processor cycles + 60,166,784 bytes consed + +di 66 +Evaluation took: + 8.569 seconds of real time + 8.560000 seconds of total run time (8.430000 user, 0.130000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.440 seconds GC time, and 8.120 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 22,224,020,052 processor cycles + 1,283,225,296 bytes consed + +ek 67 +Evaluation took: + 0.447 seconds of real time + 0.440000 seconds of total run time (0.410000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.43% CPU + 1,160,147,989 processor cycles + 63,424,144 bytes consed + +di 67 +Evaluation took: + 9.558 seconds of real time + 9.550000 seconds of total run time (9.410000 user, 0.140000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.360 seconds GC time, and 9.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 24,787,600,513 processor cycles + 1,424,869,824 bytes consed + +ek 68 +Evaluation took: + 0.410 seconds of real time + 0.410000 seconds of total run time (0.400000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,063,411,492 processor cycles + 63,900,336 bytes consed + +di 68 +Evaluation took: + 9.586 seconds of real time + 9.590000 seconds of total run time (9.470000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.330 seconds GC time, and 9.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 24,862,143,501 processor cycles + 1,439,503,168 bytes consed + +ek 69 +Evaluation took: + 0.426 seconds of real time + 0.420000 seconds of total run time (0.400000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.59% CPU + 1,102,367,539 processor cycles + 65,355,680 bytes consed + +di 69 +Evaluation took: + 9.784 seconds of real time + 9.780000 seconds of total run time (9.640000 user, 0.140000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.320 seconds GC time, and 9.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 25,373,926,513 processor cycles + 1,463,676,192 bytes consed + +ek 70 +Evaluation took: + 0.416 seconds of real time + 0.410000 seconds of total run time (0.390000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.360 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.56% CPU + 1,079,286,195 processor cycles + 64,117,216 bytes consed + +di 70 +Evaluation took: + 9.159 seconds of real time + 9.160000 seconds of total run time (9.050000 user, 0.110000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.340 seconds GC time, and 8.820 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.01% CPU + 23,752,880,580 processor cycles + 1,369,184,928 bytes consed + +ek 71 +Evaluation took: + 0.413 seconds of real time + 0.410000 seconds of total run time (0.380000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.370 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.27% CPU + 1,071,065,814 processor cycles + 66,178,736 bytes consed + +di 71 +Evaluation took: + 9.716 seconds of real time + 9.710000 seconds of total run time (9.520000 user, 0.190000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.360 seconds GC time, and 9.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 25,200,151,353 processor cycles + 1,460,135,648 bytes consed + +ek 72 +Evaluation took: + 0.470 seconds of real time + 0.470000 seconds of total run time (0.430000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.420 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,219,574,343 processor cycles + 68,886,736 bytes consed + +di 72 +Evaluation took: + 10.614 seconds of real time + 10.610000 seconds of total run time (10.460000 user, 0.150000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.290 seconds GC time, and 10.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 27,526,977,608 processor cycles + 1,565,691,248 bytes consed + +ek 73 +Evaluation took: + 0.459 seconds of real time + 0.460000 seconds of total run time (0.450000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.410 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.22% CPU + 1,189,266,221 processor cycles + 69,340,256 bytes consed + +di 73 +Evaluation took: + 10.017 seconds of real time + 10.010000 seconds of total run time (9.820000 user, 0.190000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.370 seconds GC time, and 9.640 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 25,978,267,315 processor cycles + 1,489,936,160 bytes consed + +ek 74 +Evaluation took: + 0.438 seconds of real time + 0.440000 seconds of total run time (0.430000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.400 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.46% CPU + 1,136,371,158 processor cycles + 70,512,480 bytes consed + +di 74 +Evaluation took: + 10.554 seconds of real time + 10.560000 seconds of total run time (10.420000 user, 0.140000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.410 seconds GC time, and 10.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.06% CPU + 27,372,183,943 processor cycles + 1,554,853,024 bytes consed + +ek 75 +Evaluation took: + 0.484 seconds of real time + 0.480000 seconds of total run time (0.480000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.17% CPU + 1,255,738,588 processor cycles + 73,580,288 bytes consed + +di 75 +Evaluation took: + 11.870 seconds of real time + 11.860000 seconds of total run time (11.710000 user, 0.150000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.460 seconds GC time, and 11.400 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 30,784,480,051 processor cycles + 1,755,037,568 bytes consed + +ek 76 +Evaluation took: + 0.517 seconds of real time + 0.520000 seconds of total run time (0.490000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.450 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.58% CPU + 1,340,631,188 processor cycles + 74,491,728 bytes consed + +di 76 +Evaluation took: + 11.750 seconds of real time + 11.750000 seconds of total run time (11.600000 user, 0.150000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.430 seconds GC time, and 11.320 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 30,471,756,679 processor cycles + 1,710,690,320 bytes consed + +ek 77 +Evaluation took: + 0.491 seconds of real time + 0.490000 seconds of total run time (0.490000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.80% CPU + 1,272,833,016 processor cycles + 76,915,152 bytes consed + +di 77 +Evaluation took: + 12.442 seconds of real time + 12.440000 seconds of total run time (12.210000 user, 0.230000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.450 seconds GC time, and 11.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 32,268,421,653 processor cycles + 1,793,283,664 bytes consed + +ek 78 +Evaluation took: + 0.505 seconds of real time + 0.500000 seconds of total run time (0.490000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.01% CPU + 1,310,523,435 processor cycles + 75,700,080 bytes consed + +di 78 +Evaluation took: + 11.387 seconds of real time + 11.390000 seconds of total run time (11.270000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.450 seconds GC time, and 10.940 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.03% CPU + 29,532,401,691 processor cycles + 1,654,166,448 bytes consed + +ek 79 +Evaluation took: + 0.523 seconds of real time + 0.520000 seconds of total run time (0.520000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.480 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.43% CPU + 1,355,524,573 processor cycles + 78,169,168 bytes consed + +di 79 +Evaluation took: + 12.399 seconds of real time + 12.390000 seconds of total run time (12.270000 user, 0.120000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.490 seconds GC time, and 11.900 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 32,156,734,454 processor cycles + 1,814,858,848 bytes consed + +ek 80 +Evaluation took: + 0.531 seconds of real time + 0.530000 seconds of total run time (0.520000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.490 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.81% CPU + 1,377,934,597 processor cycles + 79,178,448 bytes consed + +di 80 +Evaluation took: + 12.830 seconds of real time + 12.820000 seconds of total run time (12.600000 user, 0.220000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.470 seconds GC time, and 12.350 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 33,275,787,181 processor cycles + 1,867,300,032 bytes consed + +ek 81 +Evaluation took: + 0.573 seconds of real time + 0.570000 seconds of total run time (0.550000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.48% CPU + 1,486,642,235 processor cycles + 82,418,880 bytes consed + +di 81 +Evaluation took: + 13.767 seconds of real time + 13.770000 seconds of total run time (13.550000 user, 0.220000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.660 seconds GC time, and 13.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.02% CPU + 35,702,897,750 processor cycles + 1,966,747,008 bytes consed + +ek 82 +Evaluation took: + 0.547 seconds of real time + 0.550000 seconds of total run time (0.510000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.55% CPU + 1,420,191,747 processor cycles + 82,574,160 bytes consed + +di 82 +Evaluation took: + 13.677 seconds of real time + 13.670000 seconds of total run time (13.520000 user, 0.150000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.520 seconds GC time, and 13.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 35,471,751,224 processor cycles + 1,953,907,744 bytes consed + +ek 83 +Evaluation took: + 0.550 seconds of real time + 0.550000 seconds of total run time (0.530000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.510 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,425,964,995 processor cycles + 84,054,576 bytes consed + +di 83 +Evaluation took: + 13.560 seconds of real time + 13.550000 seconds of total run time (13.350000 user, 0.200000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.580 seconds GC time, and 12.970 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 35,167,327,208 processor cycles + 1,933,618,544 bytes consed + +ek 84 +Evaluation took: + 0.563 seconds of real time + 0.560000 seconds of total run time (0.550000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.480 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.47% CPU + 1,459,118,934 processor cycles + 84,488,496 bytes consed + +di 84 +Evaluation took: + 13.896 seconds of real time + 13.900000 seconds of total run time (13.640000 user, 0.260000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.670 seconds GC time, and 13.230 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.03% CPU + 36,040,028,882 processor cycles + 1,981,847,488 bytes consed + +ek 85 +Evaluation took: + 0.579 seconds of real time + 0.580000 seconds of total run time (0.560000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.17% CPU + 1,503,591,167 processor cycles + 85,764,720 bytes consed + +di 85 +Evaluation took: + 13.925 seconds of real time + 13.910000 seconds of total run time (13.590000 user, 0.320000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.550 seconds GC time, and 13.360 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 36,115,337,479 processor cycles + 1,981,973,152 bytes consed + +ek 86 +Evaluation took: + 0.631 seconds of real time + 0.630000 seconds of total run time (0.600000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.540 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.84% CPU + 1,635,904,374 processor cycles + 87,362,672 bytes consed + +di 86 +Evaluation took: + 15.182 seconds of real time + 15.170000 seconds of total run time (14.870000 user, 0.300000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.760 seconds GC time, and 14.410 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 39,373,142,588 processor cycles + 2,125,422,592 bytes consed + +ek 87 +Evaluation took: + 0.642 seconds of real time + 0.650000 seconds of total run time (0.640000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.620 seconds non-GC time. ] + 101.25% CPU + 1,665,680,848 processor cycles + 90,535,552 bytes consed + +di 87 +Evaluation took: + 15.837 seconds of real time + 15.820000 seconds of total run time (15.540000 user, 0.280000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.730 seconds GC time, and 15.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.89% CPU + 41,073,331,039 processor cycles + 2,234,399,264 bytes consed + +ek 88 +Evaluation took: + 0.575 seconds of real time + 0.580000 seconds of total run time (0.570000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.87% CPU + 1,491,944,532 processor cycles + 87,131,392 bytes consed + +di 88 +Evaluation took: + 13.350 seconds of real time + 13.350000 seconds of total run time (13.130000 user, 0.220000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.700 seconds GC time, and 12.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 34,621,722,798 processor cycles + 1,900,494,800 bytes consed + +ek 89 +Evaluation took: + 0.591 seconds of real time + 0.590000 seconds of total run time (0.590000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.560 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.83% CPU + 1,533,538,266 processor cycles + 90,857,760 bytes consed + +di 89 +Evaluation took: + 15.230 seconds of real time + 15.220000 seconds of total run time (14.990000 user, 0.230000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.690 seconds GC time, and 14.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 39,497,844,828 processor cycles + 2,140,824,368 bytes consed + +ek 90 +Evaluation took: + 0.664 seconds of real time + 0.670000 seconds of total run time (0.650000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.580 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.90% CPU + 1,721,937,828 processor cycles + 93,410,704 bytes consed + +di 90 +Evaluation took: + 16.317 seconds of real time + 16.300000 seconds of total run time (15.970000 user, 0.330000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.770 seconds GC time, and 15.530 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 42,319,137,250 processor cycles + 2,295,672,048 bytes consed + +ek 91 +Evaluation took: + 0.610 seconds of real time + 0.610000 seconds of total run time (0.610000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.600 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,580,219,381 processor cycles + 93,947,472 bytes consed + +di 91 +Evaluation took: + 15.572 seconds of real time + 15.560000 seconds of total run time (15.150000 user, 0.410000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.780 seconds GC time, and 14.780 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 40,386,186,399 processor cycles + 2,175,641,728 bytes consed + +ek 92 +Evaluation took: + 0.635 seconds of real time + 0.640000 seconds of total run time (0.640000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.600 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.79% CPU + 1,647,649,822 processor cycles + 96,006,560 bytes consed + +di 92 +Evaluation took: + 16.247 seconds of real time + 16.240000 seconds of total run time (15.870000 user, 0.370000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.740 seconds GC time, and 15.500 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 42,138,124,379 processor cycles + 2,274,186,896 bytes consed + +ek 93 +Evaluation took: + 0.734 seconds of real time + 0.730000 seconds of total run time (0.710000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.46% CPU + 1,903,304,260 processor cycles + 98,385,008 bytes consed + +di 93 +Evaluation took: + 17.713 seconds of real time + 17.720000 seconds of total run time (17.510000 user, 0.210000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.860 seconds GC time, and 16.860 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.04% CPU + 45,939,453,677 processor cycles + 2,450,337,120 bytes consed + +ek 94 +Evaluation took: + 0.667 seconds of real time + 0.660000 seconds of total run time (0.660000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.610 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.95% CPU + 1,730,402,336 processor cycles + 98,144,544 bytes consed + +di 94 +Evaluation took: + 17.415 seconds of real time + 17.410000 seconds of total run time (17.090000 user, 0.320000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.910 seconds GC time, and 16.500 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 45,167,793,385 processor cycles + 2,401,812,640 bytes consed + +ek 95 +Evaluation took: + 0.723 seconds of real time + 0.720000 seconds of total run time (0.710000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.650 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.59% CPU + 1,873,860,014 processor cycles + 101,426,464 bytes consed + +di 95 +Evaluation took: + 18.509 seconds of real time + 18.500000 seconds of total run time (18.070000 user, 0.430000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.000 seconds GC time, and 17.500 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 48,002,339,762 processor cycles + 2,558,884,160 bytes consed + +ek 96 +Evaluation took: + 0.737 seconds of real time + 0.730000 seconds of total run time (0.680000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.05% CPU + 1,909,806,522 processor cycles + 101,015,296 bytes consed + +di 96 +Evaluation took: + 17.670 seconds of real time + 17.660000 seconds of total run time (17.210000 user, 0.450000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.840 seconds GC time, and 16.820 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 45,828,013,218 processor cycles + 2,441,704,896 bytes consed + +ek 97 +Evaluation took: + 0.717 seconds of real time + 0.710000 seconds of total run time (0.700000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.02% CPU + 1,860,604,408 processor cycles + 103,039,888 bytes consed + +di 97 +Evaluation took: + 18.315 seconds of real time + 18.300000 seconds of total run time (17.930000 user, 0.370000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.780 seconds GC time, and 17.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 47,499,849,007 processor cycles + 2,525,993,376 bytes consed + +ek 98 +Evaluation took: + 0.711 seconds of real time + 0.700000 seconds of total run time (0.670000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.630 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.45% CPU + 1,842,817,730 processor cycles + 104,718,864 bytes consed + +di 98 +Evaluation took: + 18.192 seconds of real time + 18.190000 seconds of total run time (17.890000 user, 0.300000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.820 seconds GC time, and 17.370 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 47,181,973,475 processor cycles + 2,548,777,536 bytes consed + +ek 99 +Evaluation took: + 0.721 seconds of real time + 0.720000 seconds of total run time (0.700000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.660 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.86% CPU + 1,870,244,506 processor cycles + 105,611,888 bytes consed + +di 99 +Evaluation took: + 18.175 seconds of real time + 18.160000 seconds of total run time (17.800000 user, 0.360000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.920 seconds GC time, and 17.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 47,135,965,565 processor cycles + 2,535,742,528 bytes consed + +ek 100 +Evaluation took: + 0.792 seconds of real time + 0.790000 seconds of total run time (0.740000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 0.690 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.75% CPU + 2,055,874,405 processor cycles + 108,117,456 bytes consed + +di 100 +Evaluation took: + 19.464 seconds of real time + 19.450000 seconds of total run time (19.160000 user, 0.290000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.030 seconds GC time, and 18.420 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 50,478,955,111 processor cycles + 2,690,679,680 bytes consed + +ek 101 +Evaluation took: + 0.734 seconds of real time + 0.740000 seconds of total run time (0.720000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.82% CPU + 1,903,004,155 processor cycles + 107,922,864 bytes consed + +di 101 +Evaluation took: + 19.588 seconds of real time + 19.580000 seconds of total run time (19.170000 user, 0.410000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.970 seconds GC time, and 18.610 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 50,799,607,807 processor cycles + 2,695,320,416 bytes consed + +ek 102 +Evaluation took: + 0.754 seconds of real time + 0.750000 seconds of total run time (0.740000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.47% CPU + 1,957,235,501 processor cycles + 109,572,352 bytes consed + +di 102 +Evaluation took: + 19.792 seconds of real time + 19.780000 seconds of total run time (19.460000 user, 0.320000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.980 seconds GC time, and 18.800 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 51,331,253,519 processor cycles + 2,742,316,976 bytes consed + +ek 103 +Evaluation took: + 0.759 seconds of real time + 0.760000 seconds of total run time (0.750000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.700 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.13% CPU + 1,967,866,914 processor cycles + 109,731,568 bytes consed + +di 103 +Evaluation took: + 19.363 seconds of real time + 19.350000 seconds of total run time (18.990000 user, 0.360000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.890 seconds GC time, and 18.460 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 50,215,521,122 processor cycles + 2,661,155,632 bytes consed + +ek 104 +Evaluation took: + 0.770 seconds of real time + 0.770000 seconds of total run time (0.750000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.740 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,996,582,328 processor cycles + 112,343,712 bytes consed + +di 104 +Evaluation took: + 20.719 seconds of real time + 20.710000 seconds of total run time (20.240000 user, 0.470000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.950 seconds GC time, and 19.760 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 53,736,244,627 processor cycles + 2,834,194,928 bytes consed + +ek 105 +Evaluation took: + 0.770 seconds of real time + 0.770000 seconds of total run time (0.750000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.720 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 1,998,253,218 processor cycles + 113,370,256 bytes consed + +di 105 +Evaluation took: + 20.150 seconds of real time + 20.140000 seconds of total run time (19.720000 user, 0.420000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.050 seconds GC time, and 19.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 52,259,430,769 processor cycles + 2,783,008,432 bytes consed + +ek 106 +Evaluation took: + 0.807 seconds of real time + 0.800000 seconds of total run time (0.780000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.770 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.13% CPU + 2,090,849,943 processor cycles + 116,166,592 bytes consed + +di 106 +Evaluation took: + 21.342 seconds of real time + 21.330000 seconds of total run time (20.880000 user, 0.450000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.070 seconds GC time, and 20.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 55,351,049,910 processor cycles + 2,945,739,152 bytes consed + +ek 107 +Evaluation took: + 0.803 seconds of real time + 0.800000 seconds of total run time (0.760000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.740 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.63% CPU + 2,081,916,213 processor cycles + 114,712,432 bytes consed + +di 107 +Evaluation took: + 20.753 seconds of real time + 20.750000 seconds of total run time (20.310000 user, 0.440000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.060 seconds GC time, and 19.690 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 53,823,164,486 processor cycles + 2,840,381,120 bytes consed + +ek 108 +Evaluation took: + 0.834 seconds of real time + 0.840000 seconds of total run time (0.830000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.010 seconds GC time, and 0.830 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.72% CPU + 2,165,365,930 processor cycles + 119,567,152 bytes consed + +di 108 +Evaluation took: + 22.131 seconds of real time + 22.120000 seconds of total run time (21.730000 user, 0.390000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.080 seconds GC time, and 21.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 57,397,593,825 processor cycles + 3,015,755,200 bytes consed + +ek 109 +Evaluation took: + 0.848 seconds of real time + 0.850000 seconds of total run time (0.840000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.790 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.24% CPU + 2,199,184,169 processor cycles + 120,792,464 bytes consed + +di 109 +Evaluation took: + 22.173 seconds of real time + 22.150000 seconds of total run time (21.690000 user, 0.460000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.230 seconds GC time, and 20.920 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 57,504,654,181 processor cycles + 3,036,285,440 bytes consed + +ek 110 +Evaluation took: + 0.860 seconds of real time + 0.860000 seconds of total run time (0.850000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.780 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 2,228,610,254 processor cycles + 121,423,888 bytes consed + +di 110 +Evaluation took: + 22.514 seconds of real time + 22.500000 seconds of total run time (21.970000 user, 0.530000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.170 seconds GC time, and 21.330 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 58,389,134,726 processor cycles + 3,071,505,728 bytes consed + +ek 111 +Evaluation took: + 0.811 seconds of real time + 0.810000 seconds of total run time (0.790000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.760 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 2,103,063,287 processor cycles + 120,540,608 bytes consed + +di 111 +Evaluation took: + 21.458 seconds of real time + 21.450000 seconds of total run time (21.0000000 user, 0.450000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.180 seconds GC time, and 20.270 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 55,650,458,175 processor cycles + 2,939,805,024 bytes consed + +ek 112 +Evaluation took: + 0.861 seconds of real time + 0.860000 seconds of total run time (0.850000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.030 seconds GC time, and 0.830 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.88% CPU + 2,232,449,583 processor cycles + 122,480,112 bytes consed + +di 112 +Evaluation took: + 22.723 seconds of real time + 22.710000 seconds of total run time (22.030000 user, 0.680000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.350 seconds GC time, and 21.360 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 58,932,081,754 processor cycles + 3,089,647,696 bytes consed + +ek 113 +Evaluation took: + 0.842 seconds of real time + 0.840000 seconds of total run time (0.830000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.800 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.76% CPU + 2,182,697,075 processor cycles + 123,155,360 bytes consed + +di 113 +Evaluation took: + 22.332 seconds of real time + 22.320000 seconds of total run time (21.830000 user, 0.490000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.250 seconds GC time, and 21.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 57,916,848,821 processor cycles + 3,011,848,080 bytes consed + +ek 114 +Evaluation took: + 0.918 seconds of real time + 0.920000 seconds of total run time (0.880000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.070 seconds GC time, and 0.850 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.22% CPU + 2,380,525,368 processor cycles + 127,787,328 bytes consed + +di 114 +Evaluation took: + 24.584 seconds of real time + 24.570000 seconds of total run time (23.820000 user, 0.750000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.190 seconds GC time, and 23.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 63,758,043,271 processor cycles + 3,366,713,232 bytes consed + +ek 115 +Evaluation took: + 0.885 seconds of real time + 0.880000 seconds of total run time (0.880000 user, 0.000000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.44% CPU + 2,294,770,881 processor cycles + 129,054,432 bytes consed + +di 115 +Evaluation took: + 23.398 seconds of real time + 23.390000 seconds of total run time (22.840000 user, 0.550000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.140 seconds GC time, and 22.250 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 60,684,854,022 processor cycles + 3,203,642,448 bytes consed + +ek 116 +Evaluation took: + 0.957 seconds of real time + 0.950000 seconds of total run time (0.940000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.900 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.27% CPU + 2,481,768,705 processor cycles + 129,318,688 bytes consed + +di 116 +Evaluation took: + 25.197 seconds of real time + 25.180000 seconds of total run time (24.660000 user, 0.520000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.190 seconds GC time, and 23.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 65,349,085,438 processor cycles + 3,420,688,032 bytes consed + +ek 117 +Evaluation took: + 0.875 seconds of real time + 0.880000 seconds of total run time (0.860000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.840 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.57% CPU + 2,270,091,343 processor cycles + 130,096,816 bytes consed + +di 117 +Evaluation took: + 23.627 seconds of real time + 23.610000 seconds of total run time (23.190000 user, 0.420000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.090 seconds GC time, and 22.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 61,276,261,436 processor cycles + 3,248,621,664 bytes consed + +ek 118 +Evaluation took: + 0.934 seconds of real time + 0.930000 seconds of total run time (0.900000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.060 seconds GC time, and 0.870 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.57% CPU + 2,420,701,959 processor cycles + 131,110,464 bytes consed + +di 118 +Evaluation took: + 24.554 seconds of real time + 24.550000 seconds of total run time (23.930000 user, 0.620000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.300 seconds GC time, and 23.250 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 63,680,172,894 processor cycles + 3,325,482,400 bytes consed + +ek 119 +Evaluation took: + 0.943 seconds of real time + 0.950000 seconds of total run time (0.940000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.040 seconds GC time, and 0.910 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.74% CPU + 2,445,463,410 processor cycles + 133,089,392 bytes consed + +di 119 +Evaluation took: + 24.530 seconds of real time + 24.520000 seconds of total run time (23.970000 user, 0.550000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.240 seconds GC time, and 23.280 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 63,618,339,109 processor cycles + 3,340,872,464 bytes consed + +ek 120 +Evaluation took: + 0.943 seconds of real time + 0.950000 seconds of total run time (0.930000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.050 seconds GC time, and 0.900 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.74% CPU + 2,443,827,373 processor cycles + 134,297,280 bytes consed + +di 120 +Evaluation took: + 25.076 seconds of real time + 25.050000 seconds of total run time (24.440000 user, 0.610000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.410 seconds GC time, and 23.640 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 65,034,217,066 processor cycles + 3,399,019,632 bytes consed + +ek 121 +Evaluation took: + 0.963 seconds of real time + 0.970000 seconds of total run time (0.950000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.890 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.73% CPU + 2,496,713,076 processor cycles + 135,402,416 bytes consed + +di 121 +Evaluation took: + 25.156 seconds of real time + 25.140000 seconds of total run time (24.590000 user, 0.550000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.390 seconds GC time, and 23.750 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 65,244,033,166 processor cycles + 3,437,950,480 bytes consed + +ek 122 +Evaluation took: + 0.995 seconds of real time + 0.990000 seconds of total run time (0.970000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.910 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.50% CPU + 2,580,966,765 processor cycles + 137,518,656 bytes consed + +di 122 +Evaluation took: + 26.057 seconds of real time + 26.040000 seconds of total run time (25.420000 user, 0.620000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.520 seconds GC time, and 24.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 67,578,369,716 processor cycles + 3,534,417,520 bytes consed + +ek 123 +Evaluation took: + 1.243 seconds of real time + 1.240000 seconds of total run time (1.150000 user, 0.090000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.320 seconds GC time, and 0.920 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.76% CPU + 3,225,226,329 processor cycles + 140,234,160 bytes consed + +di 123 +Evaluation took: + 26.838 seconds of real time + 26.820000 seconds of total run time (26.260000 user, 0.560000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.180 seconds GC time, and 25.640 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 69,604,067,832 processor cycles + 3,649,657,456 bytes consed + +ek 124 +Evaluation took: + 1.051 seconds of real time + 1.050000 seconds of total run time (1.040000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 0.970 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 2,725,728,031 processor cycles + 141,334,992 bytes consed + +di 124 +Evaluation took: + 27.262 seconds of real time + 27.260000 seconds of total run time (26.580000 user, 0.680000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.510 seconds GC time, and 25.750 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 70,704,752,547 processor cycles + 3,684,357,440 bytes consed + +ek 125 +Evaluation took: + 1.037 seconds of real time + 1.030000 seconds of total run time (1.000000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.940 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.32% CPU + 2,687,922,484 processor cycles + 142,174,736 bytes consed + +di 125 +Evaluation took: + 26.630 seconds of real time + 26.620000 seconds of total run time (25.980000 user, 0.640000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.620 seconds GC time, and 25.0000 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 69,064,650,577 processor cycles + 3,588,412,448 bytes consed + +ek 126 +Evaluation took: + 1.130 seconds of real time + 1.130000 seconds of total run time (1.090000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 1.050 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.00% CPU + 2,931,882,252 processor cycles + 145,431,600 bytes consed + +di 126 +Evaluation took: + 29.414 seconds of real time + 29.390000 seconds of total run time (28.600000 user, 0.790000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.710 seconds GC time, and 27.680 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 76,284,765,232 processor cycles + 3,969,180,080 bytes consed + +ek 127 +Evaluation took: + 1.068 seconds of real time + 1.070000 seconds of total run time (1.050000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 0.940 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.19% CPU + 2,769,366,223 processor cycles + 145,117,344 bytes consed + +di 127 +Evaluation took: + 28.048 seconds of real time + 28.040000 seconds of total run time (27.310000 user, 0.730000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.660 seconds GC time, and 26.380 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 72,742,978,620 processor cycles + 3,744,632,112 bytes consed + +ek 128 +Evaluation took: + 1.186 seconds of real time + 1.190000 seconds of total run time (1.150000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 1.050 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.34% CPU + 3,074,282,380 processor cycles + 147,832,384 bytes consed + +di 128 +Evaluation took: + 30.004 seconds of real time + 29.980000 seconds of total run time (29.280000 user, 0.700000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.780 seconds GC time, and 28.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 77,814,149,218 processor cycles + 4,033,891,744 bytes consed + +ek 129 +Evaluation took: + 1.047 seconds of real time + 1.050000 seconds of total run time (1.040000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 0.960 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.29% CPU + 2,715,162,710 processor cycles + 148,184,928 bytes consed + +di 129 +Evaluation took: + 28.460 seconds of real time + 28.450000 seconds of total run time (27.760000 user, 0.690000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.720 seconds GC time, and 26.730 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 73,810,628,463 processor cycles + 3,831,266,528 bytes consed + +ek 130 +Evaluation took: + 1.139 seconds of real time + 1.150000 seconds of total run time (1.130000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.160 seconds GC time, and 0.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.97% CPU + 2,957,809,075 processor cycles + 147,907,744 bytes consed + +di 130 +Evaluation took: + 30.117 seconds of real time + 30.090000 seconds of total run time (29.300000 user, 0.790000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.700 seconds GC time, and 28.390 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.91% CPU + 78,109,053,139 processor cycles + 3,992,684,672 bytes consed + +ek 131 +Evaluation took: + 1.031 seconds of real time + 1.030000 seconds of total run time (1.020000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 0.920 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.90% CPU + 2,675,312,666 processor cycles + 146,897,968 bytes consed + +di 131 +Evaluation took: + 27.574 seconds of real time + 27.560000 seconds of total run time (26.880000 user, 0.680000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.600 seconds GC time, and 25.960 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 71,512,222,392 processor cycles + 3,694,598,352 bytes consed + +ek 132 +Evaluation took: + 1.118 seconds of real time + 1.120000 seconds of total run time (1.050000 user, 0.070000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 0.990 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.18% CPU + 2,899,022,464 processor cycles + 149,897,232 bytes consed + +di 132 +Evaluation took: + 28.300 seconds of real time + 28.280000 seconds of total run time (27.500000 user, 0.780000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.540 seconds GC time, and 26.740 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 73,395,354,669 processor cycles + 3,796,810,400 bytes consed + +ek 133 +Evaluation took: + 1.162 seconds of real time + 1.170000 seconds of total run time (1.140000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 1.060 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.69% CPU + 3,014,216,062 processor cycles + 155,246,080 bytes consed + +di 133 +Evaluation took: + 29.915 seconds of real time + 29.900000 seconds of total run time (29.230000 user, 0.670000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.420 seconds GC time, and 28.480 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.95% CPU + 77,585,461,941 processor cycles + 4,041,839,264 bytes consed + +ek 134 +Evaluation took: + 1.266 seconds of real time + 1.260000 seconds of total run time (1.210000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.260 seconds GC time, and 1.000 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.53% CPU + 3,282,494,462 processor cycles + 152,210,848 bytes consed + +di 134 +Evaluation took: + 28.597 seconds of real time + 28.580000 seconds of total run time (27.880000 user, 0.700000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.470 seconds GC time, and 27.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 74,166,162,655 processor cycles + 3,869,027,920 bytes consed + +ek 135 +Evaluation took: + 1.205 seconds of real time + 1.210000 seconds of total run time (1.110000 user, 0.100000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.110 seconds GC time, and 1.100 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.41% CPU + 3,125,854,797 processor cycles + 156,905,440 bytes consed + +di 135 +Evaluation took: + 31.463 seconds of real time + 31.450000 seconds of total run time (30.770000 user, 0.680000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.780 seconds GC time, and 29.670 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 81,599,773,138 processor cycles + 4,196,538,592 bytes consed + +ek 136 +Evaluation took: + 1.194 seconds of real time + 1.190000 seconds of total run time (1.170000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.150 seconds GC time, and 1.040 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.66% CPU + 3,094,545,207 processor cycles + 156,560,704 bytes consed + +di 136 +Evaluation took: + 30.642 seconds of real time + 30.620000 seconds of total run time (30.020000 user, 0.600000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.800 seconds GC time, and 28.820 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 79,469,633,646 processor cycles + 4,095,706,800 bytes consed + +ek 137 +Evaluation took: + 1.197 seconds of real time + 1.200000 seconds of total run time (1.150000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 1.070 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.25% CPU + 3,103,750,741 processor cycles + 157,989,440 bytes consed + +di 137 +Evaluation took: + 30.466 seconds of real time + 30.460000 seconds of total run time (29.710000 user, 0.750000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.690 seconds GC time, and 28.770 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 79,013,335,726 processor cycles + 4,109,370,016 bytes consed + +ek 138 +Evaluation took: + 1.193 seconds of real time + 1.200000 seconds of total run time (1.190000 user, 0.010000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.100 seconds GC time, and 1.100 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.59% CPU + 3,095,870,687 processor cycles + 159,183,264 bytes consed + +di 138 +Evaluation took: + 31.753 seconds of real time + 31.740000 seconds of total run time (30.950000 user, 0.790000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.820 seconds GC time, and 29.920 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 82,350,903,232 processor cycles + 4,254,167,328 bytes consed + +ek 139 +Evaluation took: + 1.258 seconds of real time + 1.250000 seconds of total run time (1.230000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.140 seconds GC time, and 1.110 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.36% CPU + 3,264,347,138 processor cycles + 163,020,224 bytes consed + +di 139 +Evaluation took: + 32.839 seconds of real time + 32.820000 seconds of total run time (32.030000 user, 0.790000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.050 seconds GC time, and 30.770 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 85,168,439,746 processor cycles + 4,356,158,192 bytes consed + +ek 140 +Evaluation took: + 1.281 seconds of real time + 1.280000 seconds of total run time (1.230000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.130 seconds GC time, and 1.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 3,322,892,963 processor cycles + 163,721,888 bytes consed + +di 140 +Evaluation took: + 34.033 seconds of real time + 34.020000 seconds of total run time (33.260000 user, 0.760000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.870 seconds GC time, and 32.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 88,262,731,752 processor cycles + 4,539,158,496 bytes consed + +ek 141 +Evaluation took: + 1.373 seconds of real time + 1.380000 seconds of total run time (1.350000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.170 seconds GC time, and 1.210 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.51% CPU + 3,562,279,344 processor cycles + 167,218,544 bytes consed + +di 141 +Evaluation took: + 33.495 seconds of real time + 33.480000 seconds of total run time (32.820000 user, 0.660000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.960 seconds GC time, and 31.520 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 86,869,931,343 processor cycles + 4,485,414,608 bytes consed + +ek 142 +Evaluation took: + 1.438 seconds of real time + 1.440000 seconds of total run time (1.340000 user, 0.100000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.270 seconds GC time, and 1.170 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.14% CPU + 3,729,898,926 processor cycles + 167,395,792 bytes consed + +di 142 +Evaluation took: + 32.843 seconds of real time + 32.820000 seconds of total run time (32.210000 user, 0.610000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.730 seconds GC time, and 31.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.93% CPU + 85,177,392,846 processor cycles + 4,393,311,056 bytes consed + +ek 143 +Evaluation took: + 1.315 seconds of real time + 1.320000 seconds of total run time (1.240000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.230 seconds GC time, and 1.090 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.38% CPU + 3,408,314,338 processor cycles + 166,905,808 bytes consed + +di 143 +Evaluation took: + 32.766 seconds of real time + 32.740000 seconds of total run time (31.810000 user, 0.930000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.110 seconds GC time, and 30.630 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.92% CPU + 84,977,628,697 processor cycles + 4,358,456,064 bytes consed + +ek 144 +Evaluation took: + 1.348 seconds of real time + 1.350000 seconds of total run time (1.300000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.230 seconds GC time, and 1.120 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.15% CPU + 3,496,938,250 processor cycles + 168,548,624 bytes consed + +di 144 +Evaluation took: + 33.263 seconds of real time + 33.250000 seconds of total run time (32.400000 user, 0.850000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.010 seconds GC time, and 31.240 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 86,267,074,166 processor cycles + 4,452,044,384 bytes consed + +ek 145 +Evaluation took: + 1.395 seconds of real time + 1.380000 seconds of total run time (1.360000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.200 seconds GC time, and 1.180 seconds non-GC time. ] + 98.92% CPU + 3,615,546,272 processor cycles + 170,936,384 bytes consed + +di 145 +Evaluation took: + 34.991 seconds of real time + 34.980000 seconds of total run time (34.240000 user, 0.740000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.060 seconds GC time, and 32.920 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.97% CPU + 90,748,616,218 processor cycles + 4,644,464,880 bytes consed + +ek 146 +Evaluation took: + 1.573 seconds of real time + 1.570000 seconds of total run time (1.490000 user, 0.080000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.440 seconds GC time, and 1.130 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.81% CPU + 4,078,700,236 processor cycles + 168,534,944 bytes consed + +di 146 +Evaluation took: + 31.968 seconds of real time + 31.950000 seconds of total run time (31.090000 user, 0.860000 system) + [ Run times consist of 1.640 seconds GC time, and 30.310 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 82,910,605,076 processor cycles + 4,301,795,264 bytes consed + +ek 147 +Evaluation took: + 1.283 seconds of real time + 1.290000 seconds of total run time (1.240000 user, 0.050000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.090 seconds GC time, and 1.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.55% CPU + 3,326,983,829 processor cycles + 173,231,904 bytes consed + +di 147 +Evaluation took: + 33.981 seconds of real time + 33.960000 seconds of total run time (33.230000 user, 0.730000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.080 seconds GC time, and 31.880 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.94% CPU + 88,129,699,255 processor cycles + 4,545,847,792 bytes consed + +ek 148 +Evaluation took: + 1.276 seconds of real time + 1.270000 seconds of total run time (1.250000 user, 0.020000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.080 seconds GC time, and 1.190 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.53% CPU + 3,309,931,196 processor cycles + 171,708,992 bytes consed + +di 148 +Evaluation took: + 33.953 seconds of real time + 33.940000 seconds of total run time (33.130000 user, 0.810000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.110 seconds GC time, and 31.830 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.96% CPU + 88,055,845,826 processor cycles + 4,518,484,768 bytes consed + +ek 149 +Evaluation took: + 1.317 seconds of real time + 1.320000 seconds of total run time (1.280000 user, 0.040000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 1.200 seconds non-GC time. ] + 100.23% CPU + 3,416,780,900 processor cycles + 177,085,312 bytes consed + +di 149 +Evaluation took: + 35.727 seconds of real time + 35.720000 seconds of total run time (34.940000 user, 0.780000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.570 seconds GC time, and 33.150 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.98% CPU + 92,657,756,971 processor cycles + 4,706,161,920 bytes consed + +ek 150 +Evaluation took: + 1.388 seconds of real time + 1.380000 seconds of total run time (1.350000 user, 0.030000 system) + [ Run times consist of 0.120 seconds GC time, and 1.260 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.42% CPU + 3,599,669,827 processor cycles + 177,137,824 bytes consed + +di 150 +Evaluation took: + 37.084 seconds of real time + 37.080000 seconds of total run time (36.230000 user, 0.850000 system) + [ Run times consist of 2.370 seconds GC time, and 34.710 seconds non-GC time. ] + 99.99% CPU + 96,176,525,120 processor cycles + 4,897,308,224 bytes consed + +NIL +* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/exo5.lisp b/exo5.lisp index 80fb7b9..60c820c 100644 --- a/exo5.lisp +++ b/exo5.lisp @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ for n from (max minn 3) to maxn for gts = (loop repeat nb-average - collect (build-graphe-exemple n)) + collect (build-graphe-exemple n 100)) for eks = (progn (format t "~&ek ~a~&" n) (time (loop diff --git a/stat.sh b/stat.sh index dbc382b..6f42e7d 100644 --- a/stat.sh +++ b/stat.sh @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/bin/sh -echo '(load "exo5") (test-between 400 200 3)' | sbcl > /tmp/$$-stat +echo '(load "exo5") (test-between 150 200 3)' | sbcl > /tmp/$$-stat cat /tmp/$$-stat | grep -v '^ek' | grep -v '^di' | tail -n +10 | grep -v '^ \[' | head -n -1 > /tmp/$$-stat2 cat /tmp/$$-stat2 | while read ab; do read ab; ab="${ab# }" echo -n "${ab%% *} "; read ab; read ab; read ab; read ab; ab="${ab# }" echo "${ab%% *}"; read ab; done > /tmp/$$-stat3 cat /tmp/$$-stat3 | while read ab; do read xy; echo "$ab $xy"; done diff --git a/stat100.txt b/stat100.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fcdf8d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/stat100.txt @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +0.000 138,720 0.000 192,176 +0.001 253,040 0.001 554,192 +0.001 451,632 0.008 1,094,256 +0.001 670,656 0.005 1,973,952 +0.003 984,512 0.009 3,252,400 +0.004 1,344,000 0.017 5,526,816 +0.004 1,726,448 0.034 7,905,152 +0.007 2,147,216 0.040 11,232,736 +0.008 2,710,640 0.053 15,751,728 +0.009 3,221,392 0.076 21,026,224 +0.021 3,783,552 0.096 25,197,840 +0.014 4,381,760 0.124 31,678,992 +0.019 4,958,688 0.161 39,744,624 +0.023 5,659,984 0.186 47,079,264 +0.024 6,390,256 0.245 57,370,656 +0.027 7,177,648 0.290 67,955,328 +0.033 8,031,664 0.377 81,646,784 +0.037 8,629,472 0.423 91,793,424 +0.050 9,555,856 0.479 106,081,408 +0.046 10,387,664 0.554 119,197,056 +0.048 11,296,400 0.648 136,050,624 +0.055 12,069,296 0.704 149,721,584 +0.072 13,171,232 0.798 169,706,992 +0.064 13,847,600 0.847 175,670,992 +0.084 14,851,680 0.980 201,326,880 +0.071 16,277,600 1.160 231,137,200 +0.080 16,818,992 1.191 237,004,160 +0.090 17,779,696 1.283 252,792,960 +0.135 18,993,072 1.454 284,697,632 +0.121 20,147,776 1.575 304,445,856 +0.096 20,499,632 1.581 301,150,096 +0.115 22,117,968 1.905 357,045,760 +0.124 23,283,712 2.015 371,769,200 +0.121 24,115,680 2.229 407,555,824 +0.140 25,890,976 2.481 447,448,688 +0.142 26,614,672 2.543 454,963,696 +0.145 27,725,472 2.753 484,057,840 +0.167 28,496,912 2.868 503,286,608 +0.185 30,108,544 3.204 547,396,496 +0.205 31,665,728 3.469 597,261,408 +0.200 32,754,688 3.572 612,174,416 +0.235 33,439,744 3.696 627,597,440 +0.208 34,558,992 3.881 654,514,864 +0.229 35,916,848 4.036 675,197,696 +0.236 37,180,944 4.153 688,248,960 +0.296 38,453,504 4.490 748,439,824 +0.248 39,884,560 4.831 790,584,848 +0.265 40,877,696 5.117 829,314,144 +0.259 41,621,696 5.086 824,577,376 +0.276 42,466,208 5.006 808,378,816 +0.279 44,548,816 5.607 895,429,040 +0.301 46,466,832 6.162 975,795,072 +0.316 47,210,768 6.121 964,582,032 +0.323 48,465,136 6.667 1,040,988,560 +0.319 49,870,912 6.635 1,041,279,840 +0.342 51,412,912 7.266 1,117,222,288 +0.351 52,292,240 7.363 1,129,302,992 +0.348 52,324,048 6.978 1,075,051,248 +0.381 55,327,920 8.115 1,232,337,776 +0.493 56,985,808 8.228 1,258,867,648 +0.379 57,056,176 7.978 1,210,788,144 +0.352 58,774,128 8.669 1,307,130,464 +0.409 59,640,272 8.741 1,316,286,128 +0.406 60,166,784 8.569 1,283,225,296 +0.447 63,424,144 9.558 1,424,869,824 +0.410 63,900,336 9.586 1,439,503,168 +0.426 65,355,680 9.784 1,463,676,192 +0.416 64,117,216 9.159 1,369,184,928 +0.413 66,178,736 9.716 1,460,135,648 +0.470 68,886,736 10.614 1,565,691,248 +0.459 69,340,256 10.017 1,489,936,160 +0.438 70,512,480 10.554 1,554,853,024 +0.484 73,580,288 11.870 1,755,037,568 +0.517 74,491,728 11.750 1,710,690,320 +0.491 76,915,152 12.442 1,793,283,664 +0.505 75,700,080 11.387 1,654,166,448 +0.523 78,169,168 12.399 1,814,858,848 +0.531 79,178,448 12.830 1,867,300,032 +0.573 82,418,880 13.767 1,966,747,008 +0.547 82,574,160 13.677 1,953,907,744 +0.550 84,054,576 13.560 1,933,618,544 +0.563 84,488,496 13.896 1,981,847,488 +0.579 85,764,720 13.925 1,981,973,152 +0.631 87,362,672 15.182 2,125,422,592 +0.642 90,535,552 15.837 2,234,399,264 +0.575 87,131,392 13.350 1,900,494,800 +0.591 90,857,760 15.230 2,140,824,368 +0.664 93,410,704 16.317 2,295,672,048 +0.610 93,947,472 15.572 2,175,641,728 +0.635 96,006,560 16.247 2,274,186,896 +0.734 98,385,008 17.713 2,450,337,120 +0.667 98,144,544 17.415 2,401,812,640 +0.723 101,426,464 18.509 2,558,884,160 +0.737 101,015,296 17.670 2,441,704,896 +0.717 103,039,888 18.315 2,525,993,376 +0.711 104,718,864 18.192 2,548,777,536 +0.721 105,611,888 18.175 2,535,742,528 +0.792 108,117,456 19.464 2,690,679,680 +0.734 107,922,864 19.588 2,695,320,416 +0.754 109,572,352 19.792 2,742,316,976 +0.759 109,731,568 19.363 2,661,155,632 +0.770 112,343,712 20.719 2,834,194,928 +0.770 113,370,256 20.150 2,783,008,432 +0.807 116,166,592 21.342 2,945,739,152 +0.803 114,712,432 20.753 2,840,381,120 +0.834 119,567,152 22.131 3,015,755,200 +0.848 120,792,464 22.173 3,036,285,440 +0.860 121,423,888 22.514 3,071,505,728 +0.811 120,540,608 21.458 2,939,805,024 +0.861 122,480,112 22.723 3,089,647,696 +0.842 123,155,360 22.332 3,011,848,080 +0.918 127,787,328 24.584 3,366,713,232 +0.885 129,054,432 23.398 3,203,642,448 +0.957 129,318,688 25.197 3,420,688,032 +0.875 130,096,816 23.627 3,248,621,664 +0.934 131,110,464 24.554 3,325,482,400 +0.943 133,089,392 24.530 3,340,872,464 +0.943 134,297,280 25.076 3,399,019,632 +0.963 135,402,416 25.156 3,437,950,480 +0.995 137,518,656 26.057 3,534,417,520 +1.243 140,234,160 26.838 3,649,657,456 +1.051 141,334,992 27.262 3,684,357,440 +1.037 142,174,736 26.630 3,588,412,448 +1.130 145,431,600 29.414 3,969,180,080 +1.068 145,117,344 28.048 3,744,632,112 +1.186 147,832,384 30.004 4,033,891,744 +1.047 148,184,928 28.460 3,831,266,528 +1.139 147,907,744 30.117 3,992,684,672 +1.031 146,897,968 27.574 3,694,598,352 +1.118 149,897,232 28.300 3,796,810,400 +1.162 155,246,080 29.915 4,041,839,264 +1.266 152,210,848 28.597 3,869,027,920 +1.205 156,905,440 31.463 4,196,538,592 +1.194 156,560,704 30.642 4,095,706,800 +1.197 157,989,440 30.466 4,109,370,016 +1.193 159,183,264 31.753 4,254,167,328 +1.258 163,020,224 32.839 4,356,158,192 +1.281 163,721,888 34.033 4,539,158,496 +1.373 167,218,544 33.495 4,485,414,608 +1.438 167,395,792 32.843 4,393,311,056 +1.315 166,905,808 32.766 4,358,456,064 +1.348 168,548,624 33.263 4,452,044,384 +1.395 170,936,384 34.991 4,644,464,880 +1.573 168,534,944 31.968 4,301,795,264 +1.283 173,231,904 33.981 4,545,847,792 +1.276 171,708,992 33.953 4,518,484,768 +1.317 177,085,312 35.727 4,706,161,920 +1.388 177,137,824 37.084 4,897,308,224 + diff --git a/stat50.txt b/stat50.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e69de29