diff --git a/src/Mod/PartDesign/App/Body.cpp b/src/Mod/PartDesign/App/Body.cpp
index de12e7107..7eb72256e 100644
--- a/src/Mod/PartDesign/App/Body.cpp
+++ b/src/Mod/PartDesign/App/Body.cpp
@@ -244,9 +244,11 @@ const bool Body::isAllowed(const App::DocumentObject* f)
     // TODO: Should we introduce a PartDesign::FeaturePython class? This should then also return true for isSolidFeature()
     return (f->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(PartDesign::Feature::getClassTypeId()) ||
             f->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Datum::getClassTypeId())   ||
-            f->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Part2DObject::getClassTypeId()) ||
+            // TODO Shouldn't we replace it with Sketcher::SketchObject? (2015-08-13, Fat-Zer)
+            f->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Part2DObject::getClassTypeId())
+            // TODO Why this lines was here? why should we allow anything of those? (2015-08-13, Fat-Zer)
             //f->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::FeaturePython::getClassTypeId()) // trouble with this line on Windows!? Linker fails to find getClassTypeId() of the Part::FeaturePython...
-            f->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Feature::getClassTypeId())
+            //f->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Feature::getClassTypeId())
             );
 }