Summary:
Make delimiter sizing work. This involved
- Adding the symbols for the remaining delimiters (like `\lfloor` and `\{`)
- Adding metrics for the size1, size2, size3, and size4 fonts
- Parsing delimiter sizing functions
- Using the big fonts when possible, otherwise building large copies of the
delimiters from scratch
Test Plan:
- See that
`\bigl\uparrow\Bigl\downarrow\biggl\updownarrow\Biggl\Uparrow
\Biggr\Downarrow\biggr\Updownarrow\bigm/\Bigm\backslash\biggm|
\Biggm|\big\lceil\Big\rceil\bigg\langle\Bigg\rangle\bigl(\Bigl)
\biggl[\Biggl]\Biggr\{\biggr\}\Bigr\lfloor\bigr\rfloor`
parses correctly (this contains all of the delimiters, and all of the sizing
modes)
- See that the huxley tests didn't change, and the new one looks good
- See the normal tests work
Reviewers: alpert
Reviewed By: alpert
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D7844
Summary:
\nleq and \ngeq are AMS characters, so add support for parsing and
showing those. Also, add font metrics from the ams_regular font.
Test Plan:
View `\ngeq \geq`, make sure that they look the same but with a
slash through `\ngeq`. View `a \ngeq b`, make sure there's the right spacing
for a rel.
Reviewers: alpert
Reviewed By: alpert
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D3547
Summary:
Fixes T1325.
This has the advantage of not having to do the mapping manually. Also it means that characters like \neq are included in the mapping, so this resolves T1323 as well.
I opted to group the metrics by character instead of by metric type because I think it'll gzip better and it makes getCharacterMetrics simpler anyway.
Test Plan: The test page looks identical to the pixel to my eye.
Reviewers: emily
Reviewed By: emily
Maniphest Tasks: T1323, T1325
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D3535
Summary: Add margin to the right of characters that have italic correction.
Test Plan:
Look at `f'` and `C'` before and after. Note that they both now look
good at small font sizes (like 17pt).
Reviewers: alpert
Reviewed By: alpert
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D3534
Summary:
This diff does a couple different things:
- There is now a metrics/ folder, which contains the property files describing
the metrics if the fonts, as well as a script for reading and printing the
metrics in javascript.
- Fractions and superscripts/subscripts are now rendered in slightly different
ways now (notably, no use of inline-table). This allows for much more precise
positioning of the superscripts, subscripts, numerators, and denominators,
while still having an appropriate baseline. Also, there is no longer a
sup/sub/supsub distinction, there are only supsubs with null sup/sub.
- Using the new font metrics and by implementing the formulas found in The TeX
Book, Appendix G, the heights and depths of all of the sub-expressions in a
formula are now calculated. These are currently used to:
- Correctly position superscripts, subscripts, numerators, and denominators
- Adjust the height and depth of the overall expression so it takes up the
appropriate space
- Because we have to add attributes (height and depth) to every attribute, I
have changed the way DOM nodes are assembled. Now, instead of assembling the
DOM elements inline (which is a problem because we need to track
height/depth, and we shouldn't (and can't in IE 8) attach raw attributes to DOM
nodes), we assemble a pseudo-DOM structure with the extra information, and
then actually assemble it at the very end.
The main page also now has an updated expression to show off and test the new
and improved parsing.
Test Plan:
View the main page, make sure that the expression renders. Make sure
that the tests pass. Make sure that expressions have the correct calculated
height (this is most easily tested by viewing them on the main page and making
sure that the top of the expression lines up with the bottom of the input box).
Reviewers: alpert
Reviewed By: alpert
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D3442
