From 74026b5e5120c6435e9074b0c8b0e9e4b5136a33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stevie Strickland Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:11:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Slight change just because we're now printing what kind of thing triggered the broken contract. svn: r11714 original commit: 16bce22386654e186f8e806aa5ee289fff380925 --- .../tests/mzscheme/contract-mzlib-test.ss | 20 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/collects/tests/mzscheme/contract-mzlib-test.ss b/collects/tests/mzscheme/contract-mzlib-test.ss index c32dc4c..9b5a801 100644 --- a/collects/tests/mzscheme/contract-mzlib-test.ss +++ b/collects/tests/mzscheme/contract-mzlib-test.ss @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ of the contract library does not change over time. (equal? blame (cond - [(regexp-match #rx"(^| )([^ ]*) broke" msg) + [(regexp-match #rx"(^| )(.*) broke" msg) => (λ (x) (caddr x))] [else (format "no blame in error message: \"~a\"" msg)]))) @@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ of the contract library does not change over time. (and (exn? exn) (,has-proper-blame? (exn-message exn)))))))))) - (define (test/pos-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "pos")) - (define (test/neg-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "neg")) + (define (test/pos-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "module pos")) + (define (test/neg-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "module neg")) (define (test/well-formed stx) (contract-eval @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ of the contract library does not change over time. (contract-eval `(,test #t flat-contract? ,contract)) (test/spec-failed (format "~a fail" name) `(contract ,contract ',fail 'pos 'neg) - "pos") + "module pos") (test/spec-passed/result (format "~a pass" name) `(contract ,contract ',pass 'pos 'neg) @@ -1577,14 +1577,14 @@ of the contract library does not change over time. '(let () (define/contract i integer? #t) i) - "i") + "definition i") (test/spec-failed 'define/contract3 '(let () (define/contract i (-> integer? integer?) (lambda (x) #t)) (i 1)) - "i") + "definition i") (test/spec-failed 'define/contract4 @@ -4643,7 +4643,7 @@ so that propagation occurs. (provide/contract (x integer?)))) (eval '(require 'contract-test-suite3)) (eval 'x)) - "'contract-test-suite3") + "module 'contract-test-suite3") (test/spec-passed 'provide/contract4 @@ -4820,7 +4820,7 @@ so that propagation occurs. (make-s 1 2) [s-a #f]))) (eval '(require 'pc11b-n))) - 'n) + "module 'n") |# (test/spec-passed @@ -4888,7 +4888,7 @@ so that propagation occurs. (define i #f) (provide/contract [i integer?]))) (eval '(require 'pos))) - "'pos") + "module 'pos") ;; this is really a positive violation, but name the module `neg' just for an addl test (test/spec-failed @@ -4899,7 +4899,7 @@ so that propagation occurs. (define i #f) (provide/contract [i integer?]))) (eval '(require 'neg))) - "'neg") + "module 'neg") ;; this test doesn't pass yet ... waiting for support from define-struct