working for v4
svn: r9271
This commit is contained in:
parent
eacfa111d6
commit
00bba9428c
|
@ -1146,6 +1146,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
(define (annotate/module-top-level exp)
|
||||
(cond [(stepper-syntax-property exp 'stepper-skip-completely) exp]
|
||||
;; for kathy's test engine:
|
||||
[(syntax-property exp 'test-call) exp]
|
||||
[(stepper-syntax-property exp 'stepper-define-struct-hint)
|
||||
#`(begin #,exp
|
||||
(#,(make-define-struct-break exp)))]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
|
|||
mzlib/contract
|
||||
"model-settings.ss"
|
||||
"shared.ss"
|
||||
#;(file "/Users/clements/clements/scheme-scraps/eli-debug.ss")
|
||||
(for-syntax scheme/base))
|
||||
|
||||
(provide/contract [unwind (syntax? render-settings? . -> . syntax?)])
|
||||
|
@ -139,7 +140,7 @@
|
|||
(if define-type
|
||||
(kernel:kernel-syntax-case
|
||||
unwound-body #f
|
||||
[(#%plain-lambda arglist lam-body ...)
|
||||
[(lambda arglist lam-body ...)
|
||||
(case define-type
|
||||
[(shortened-proc-define)
|
||||
(let ([proc-define-name
|
||||
|
@ -243,6 +244,8 @@
|
|||
(syntax-case stx (if begin)
|
||||
;; the else clause disappears when it's a
|
||||
;; language-inserted else clause
|
||||
[(if test result)
|
||||
(list (unwind-cond-clause stx #`test #`result settings))]
|
||||
[(if test result else-clause)
|
||||
(cons (unwind-cond-clause stx #`test #`result settings)
|
||||
(loop (syntax else-clause)))]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -66,13 +66,15 @@
|
|||
boolean? ; track-inferred-names?
|
||||
(or/c object? (symbols 'testing)) ;; FIXME: can do better: subclass of language% ; the language level
|
||||
(procedure? . -> . void?) ; run-on-drscheme-side
|
||||
boolean? ; disable-error-handling (to allow debugging)
|
||||
. -> .
|
||||
void?)])
|
||||
|
||||
; go starts a stepper instance
|
||||
; see provide stmt for contract
|
||||
(define (go program-expander receive-result render-settings
|
||||
show-lambdas-as-lambdas? language-level run-on-drscheme-side)
|
||||
show-lambdas-as-lambdas? language-level run-on-drscheme-side
|
||||
disable-error-handling)
|
||||
|
||||
;; finished-exps:
|
||||
;; (listof (list/c syntax-object? (or/c number? false?)( -> any)))
|
||||
|
@ -104,7 +106,7 @@
|
|||
;; whole be highlighted. Is either one "wrong?" equivalences between
|
||||
;; reduction semantics?
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; 2005-11-14: punting. just highlight the whole damn thing if there are
|
||||
;; 2005-11-14: punting. just highlight the whole darn thing if there are
|
||||
;; any differences. In fact, just test for eq?-ness.
|
||||
|
||||
#;
|
||||
|
@ -311,10 +313,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
(program-expander
|
||||
(lambda ()
|
||||
;; swap these to allow errors to escape (e.g., when debugging)
|
||||
#;(error-display-handler err-display-handler)
|
||||
(void)
|
||||
)
|
||||
(unless disable-error-handling
|
||||
(error-display-handler err-display-handler)))
|
||||
(lambda (expanded continue-thunk) ; iter
|
||||
(r:reset-special-values)
|
||||
(if (eof-object? expanded)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -468,7 +468,8 @@
|
|||
(send language-level stepper:enable-let-lifting?))
|
||||
(send language-level stepper:show-lambdas-as-lambdas?)
|
||||
language-level
|
||||
run-on-drscheme-side)
|
||||
run-on-drscheme-side
|
||||
#f)
|
||||
(send s-frame show #t)
|
||||
|
||||
s-frame)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user