From 04836dbae125b3d9cb5cedd67de1af6ddd2e08eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Flatt Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 07:22:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix more typos svn: r6501 --- collects/scribblings/guide/apply.scrbl | 4 ++-- collects/scribblings/guide/lambda.scrbl | 4 ++-- collects/scribblings/guide/welcome.scrbl | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/collects/scribblings/guide/apply.scrbl b/collects/scribblings/guide/apply.scrbl index cfdcde633e..fb185148b5 100644 --- a/collects/scribblings/guide/apply.scrbl +++ b/collects/scribblings/guide/apply.scrbl @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ An expression of the form is a procedure application when @scheme[_proc-expr] is not an identifier that is bound as a transformer. The @scheme[...] in this -syntactic sketch means ``zero or more repetitions of the preceeding -element;'' that is, zero or more @scheme[_arg-expr]s. +syntactic sketch means ``zero or more repetitions of the preceding +element.'' Specifically, it means zero or more @scheme[_arg-expr]s. A procedure application is evaluated by first evaluating the @scheme[_proc-expr] and all @scheme[_arg-expr]s in order (left to diff --git a/collects/scribblings/guide/lambda.scrbl b/collects/scribblings/guide/lambda.scrbl index 28c6924dcb..11d805eeeb 100644 --- a/collects/scribblings/guide/lambda.scrbl +++ b/collects/scribblings/guide/lambda.scrbl @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ case, a @scheme[lambda] expression has the form ] The @scheme[...+] in this syntactic sketch means ``one or more -repetitions of the preceeding element;'' that is, one or more -@scheme[_body-expr]s. +repetitions of the preceeding element.'' Specifically, it means one or +more @scheme[_body-expr]s. A @scheme[lambda] form with @math{n} @scheme[_arg-id]s accepts @math{n} arguments: diff --git a/collects/scribblings/guide/welcome.scrbl b/collects/scribblings/guide/welcome.scrbl index fae72d706d..b7e2be7537 100644 --- a/collects/scribblings/guide/welcome.scrbl +++ b/collects/scribblings/guide/welcome.scrbl @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ traditional Scheme environment, but we strongly recommend against using Writing definitions outside of a module leads to bad error messages, bad performance, and awkward scripting to combine and run -programs. The problems are not in @exec{mzscheme}'s implementation; +programs. The problems are not specific to @exec{mzscheme}; they're fundamental limitations of the traditional top-level environment, which Scheme and Lisp implementations have historically fought with ad hoc command-line flags, compiler directives, and