New version for srfi-17.

This commit is contained in:
Eli Barzilay 2011-02-18 14:42:06 -05:00
parent 783945f96b
commit 0978b54dd2

View File

@ -1,95 +1,42 @@
;;;
;;; <set.ss> ---- SRFI 17 Generalized set!
;;; Time-stamp: <02/07/22 20:28:59 solsona>
;;;
;;; Copyright (C) Per Bothner (1999, 2000). All Rights Reserved.
;;; See: http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-17/srfi-17.html
;;;
;;; Based on the implementation for Scheme48.
#lang racket/base
#lang scheme/base
(provide (rename-out [my-set! s:set!])
setter
set-setter!
getter-with-setter)
;; Simple implementation by Eli Barzilay,
;; (compatible names to the srfi version.)
(define-syntax my-set!
(syntax-rules ()
((my-set! (?e0 ?e1 ...) ?v)
((setter ?e0) ?e1 ... ?v))
((my-set! ?i ?v)
(set! ?i ?v))))
(provide s:set! setter set-setter! getter-with-setter)
(define (getter-with-setter get set)
(let ((proc (lambda args (apply get args))))
(set-setter! proc set)
proc))
(require (for-syntax racket/base))
(define setters (make-weak-hasheq)) ; weak => usable for local functions
(define (setter proc)
(let ((probe (assv proc setters)))
(if probe
(cdr probe)
(error (object-name proc) "No setter found"))))
(hash-ref setters proc
(lambda () (error 'setter "could not find a setter for ~e" proc))))
(define (set-setter! proc setter)
(set! setters
(let loop ([setters setters])
(cond
[(null? setters)
(list (cons proc setter))]
[(eqv? proc (caar setters))
(cons (cons proc setter)
(cdr setters))]
[else (cons (car setters)
(loop (cdr setters)))]))))
;; it seems better to throw an error if a setter already exists, but I
;; didn't do that to keep it compatible with the original srfi code.
(hash-set! setters proc setter))
#|
(define (car-setter proc)
(lambda (p v)
(set-car! (proc p) v)))
(define-syntax (s:set! stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
[(s:set! (E0 E1 ...) V) #'((setter E0) E1 ... V)]
[(s:set! x V) (identifier? #'x) #'(set! x V)]))
(define (cdr-setter proc)
(lambda (p v)
(set-cdr! (proc p) v)))
|#
(define (getter-with-setter getter setter)
;; I don't see any reason why the sample version returns a wrapped
;; getter function, it seems like it would kill any chance of inlining
;; with any compiler (eg, the resulting arity can be different). In
;; fact, I don't see any reason for this thing at all... (Keeping it
;; just to be compatible...)
(set-setter! getter setter)
getter)
(define setters
(list (cons setter set-setter!)
(cons vector-ref vector-set!)
(cons string-ref string-set!)
#|
(cons car set-car!)
(cons cdr set-cdr!)
(cons caar (car-setter car))
(cons cdar (cdr-setter car))
(cons cadr (car-setter cdr))
(cons cddr (cdr-setter cdr))
(cons caaar (car-setter caar))
(cons cdaar (cdr-setter caar))
(cons cadar (car-setter cdar))
(cons cddar (cdr-setter cdar))
(cons caadr (car-setter cadr))
(cons cdadr (cdr-setter cadr))
(cons caddr (car-setter cddr))
(cons cdddr (cdr-setter cddr))
(cons caaaar (car-setter caaar))
(cons cdaaar (cdr-setter caaar))
(cons cadaar (car-setter cdaar))
(cons cddaar (cdr-setter cdaar))
(cons caadar (car-setter cadar))
(cons cdadar (cdr-setter cadar))
(cons caddar (car-setter cddar))
(cons cdddar (cdr-setter cddar))
(cons caaadr (car-setter caadr))
(cons cdaadr (cdr-setter caadr))
(cons cadadr (car-setter cdadr))
(cons cddadr (cdr-setter cdadr))
(cons caaddr (car-setter caddr))
(cons cdaddr (cdr-setter caddr))
(cons cadddr (car-setter cdddr))
(cons cddddr (cdr-setter cdddr))
|#
))
;; Initialize the table
(for ([x (in-list `([,setter ,set-setter!]
[,vector-ref ,vector-set!]
[,string-ref ,string-set!]
[,mcar ,set-mcar!]
[,mcdr ,set-mcdr!]
[,hash-ref ,hash-set!]))])
(set-setter! (car x) (cadr x)))