fix gaps in the `mzscheme' docs
Closes PR 11832
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6efdff4ec
commit
0acdd67d52
|
@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
|
|||
base-free-identifier=? base-free-template-identifier=?
|
||||
base-free-transformer-identifier=? base-free-label-identifier=?)
|
||||
|
||||
@(define-syntax-rule (additionals racket/base id ...)
|
||||
(begin
|
||||
(require (for-label (only-in racket/base id ...)))
|
||||
(schemeblock id ...)))
|
||||
|
||||
@(define old-vers @elem{version 372})
|
||||
|
||||
@title{@bold{MzScheme}: Legacy Module Language}
|
||||
|
@ -210,7 +215,7 @@ The same as @|base-top-interaction| in @schememodname[scheme/base].}
|
|||
|
||||
@; ----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@section{Old Functions}
|
||||
@section[#:tag "Old_Functions"]{Old Functions}
|
||||
|
||||
@defproc[(apply [proc procedure?] [v any/c] ... [lst list?]) any]{
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -390,3 +395,26 @@ redundant or @scheme['equal] is provided with @scheme['eqv], the
|
|||
Like @scheme[make-immutable-hash], @scheme[make-immutable-hasheq], or
|
||||
@scheme[make-immutable-hasheqv], depending on whether an
|
||||
@scheme['equal] or @scheme['eqv] @scheme[flag] is provided.}
|
||||
|
||||
@; ----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@section{Extra Libraries}
|
||||
|
||||
The @racketmodname[mzscheme] library re-exports
|
||||
@racketmodname[racket/promise], @racketmodname[racket/tcp], and
|
||||
@racketmodname[racket/udp].
|
||||
|
||||
@; ----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@section{Omitted Functions}
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to functions that have replacements listed in
|
||||
@secref["Old_Functions"], the following functions are exported by
|
||||
@racketmodname[racket/base] but not @racketmodname[mzscheme]:
|
||||
|
||||
@additionals[ racket/base
|
||||
compose filter sort foldl foldr
|
||||
remv remq remove remv* remq* remove* memf assf findf
|
||||
build-vector build-string build-list
|
||||
hash-keys hash-values hash->list hash-set* hash-set*!
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user