dic docs for 'do' (PR 9640)

svn: r10970

collects/scribblings/reference/for.scrbl

@@ -312,29 +312,28 @@ parallel iterations.}
 @section{Do Loops}
 
 @defform/subs[(do ([id init-expr step-expr-maybe] ...)
-                  (cont?-expr finish-expr ...)
+                  (stop?-expr finish-expr ...)
                 expr ...+)
               ([step-expr-maybe code:blank
                                 step-expr])]{
 
 Iteratively evaluates the @scheme[expr]s for as long as
-@scheme[cont-expr?] returns @scheme[#t].
+@scheme[stop-expr?] returns @scheme[#f].
 
 To initialize the loop, the @scheme[init-expr]s are evaluated in order
 and bound to the corresponding @scheme[id]s. The @scheme[id]s are
 bound in all expressions within the form other than the
 @scheme[init-expr]s.
 
-After he @scheme[id]s are bound, then @scheme[cont?-expr] is
-evaluated. If it produces a true value, then each @scheme[expr] is
-evaluated for its side-effect. The @scheme[id]s are then updated with
-the values of the @scheme[step-expr]s, where the default
-@scheme[step-expr] for @scheme[id] is just @scheme[id]. Iteration
-continues by evaluating @scheme[cont?-expr].
+After he @scheme[id]s are bound, then @scheme[stop?-expr] is
+evaluated. If it produces @scheme[#f], each @scheme[expr] is evaluated
+for its side-effect. The @scheme[id]s are then updated with the values
+of the @scheme[step-expr]s, where the default @scheme[step-expr] for
+@scheme[id] is just @scheme[id]. Iteration continues by evaluating
+@scheme[cont?-expr].
 
-When @scheme[cont?-expr] produces @scheme[#f], then the
+When @scheme[stop?-expr] produces a true value, then the
 @scheme[finish-expr]s are evaluated in order, and the last one is
 evaluated in tail position to produce the overall value for the
 @scheme[do] form. If no @scheme[finish-expr] is provided, the value of
 the @scheme[do] form is @|void-const|.}
-

collects/scribblings/reference/numbers.scrbl

@@ -569,6 +569,15 @@ produces @scheme[+nan.0] in the case that neither @scheme[y] nor
 @examples[(bitwise-not 5) (bitwise-not -1)]}
 
 
+@defproc[(bitwise-bit-set? [n exact-integer?] [m exact-nonnegative-integer?])
+         boolean?]{
+
+Returns @scheme[(not (zero? (bitwise-and n (arithmetic-shift 1 m))))],
+but normally without allocating intermediate results.
+
+@examples[(bitwise-bit-set? 5 0) (bitwise-bit-set? 5 2) (bitwise-bit-set? -5 (expt 2 700))]}
+
+
 @defproc[(arithmetic-shift [n exact-integer?] [m exact-integer?])
  exact-integer?]{ Returns the bitwise ``shift'' of @scheme[n] in its
  (semi-infinite) two's complement representation.  If @scheme[m] is
@@ -579,7 +588,6 @@ produces @scheme[+nan.0] in the case that neither @scheme[y] nor
 
 @examples[(arithmetic-shift 1 10) (arithmetic-shift 255 -3)]}
 
-
 @defproc[(integer-length [n exact-integer?]) exact-integer?]{ Returns
  the number of bits in the (semi-infinite) two's complement
  representation of @scheme[n] after removing all leading zeros (for

collects/scribblings/reference/sequences.scrbl

@@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ its value from @scheme[hash] (as opposed to using @scheme[hash] directly
 as a sequence to get the key and value as separate values for each
 element).}
 
+@defproc[(in-value [v any/c]) sequence]{
+Returns a sequence that produces a single value: @scheme[v]. This form
+is mostly useful for @scheme[let]-like bindings in forms such as
+@scheme[for*/list].}
+
 @defproc[(in-indexed [seq sequence?]) sequence?]{Returns a sequence
 where each element has two values: the value produced by @scheme[seq],
 and a non-negative exact integer starting with @scheme[0]. The