suzanne.soy/racket
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

avoid pointless digits when printing single-precision floats

Browse Source 
Closes PR 12118
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Flatt 2011-08-18 13:20:48 -06:00
parent 39edc5a599
commit 1d6c3aa4ea
1 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
src/racket/src/numstr.c
View File

@ -1566,11 +1566,15 @@ static char *double_to_string (double d, int alloc, int was_single)
#endif
s = "0.0";
} else {
/* Initial count for significant digits is 14. That's big enough to
get most right, small enough to avoid nonsense digits. But we'll
loop in case it's not precise enough to get read-write invariance: */
/* Initial count for significant digits is 14 (double) or 6 digits
(single). That's big enough to get most right, small enough to
avoid nonsense digits. But we'll loop in case it's not precise
enough to get read-write invariance: */
GC_CAN_IGNORE char *loc;
digits = 14;
if (was_single)
digits = 6;
else
digits = 14;
loc = scheme_push_c_numeric_locale();
while (digits < 30) {
double check;
@ -1580,8 +1584,13 @@ static char *double_to_string (double d, int alloc, int was_single)
/* Did we get read-write invariance, yet? */
check = strtod(buffer, &ptr);
if (check == d)
break;
if (was_single) {
if ((float)check == (float)d)
break;
} else {
if (check == d)
break;
}
digits++;
}