tighten up the checks in the place where the framework receives
values from the lexer (for syntax coloring)
This commit is contained in:
parent
59eb1ad13c
commit
246939f781
|
@ -328,18 +328,18 @@ added get-regions
|
|||
[(and did-something? ((+ start-time 20.0) . <= . (current-inexact-milliseconds)))
|
||||
#f]
|
||||
[else
|
||||
;(define-values (_line1 _col1 pos-before) (port-next-location in))
|
||||
(define-values (_line1 _col1 pos-before) (port-next-location in))
|
||||
(define-values (lexeme type data new-token-start new-token-end backup-delta new-lexer-mode)
|
||||
(get-token in in-start-pos lexer-mode))
|
||||
;(define-values (_line2 _col2 pos-after) (port-next-location in))
|
||||
(define-values (_line2 _col2 pos-after) (port-next-location in))
|
||||
(cond
|
||||
[(eq? 'eof type)
|
||||
(set-lexer-state-up-to-date?! ls #t)
|
||||
(re-tokenize-move-to-next-ls start-time #t)]
|
||||
[else
|
||||
(unless (exact-nonnegative-integer? new-token-start)
|
||||
(unless (exact-positive-integer? new-token-start)
|
||||
(error 'color:text<%> "expected an exact nonnegative integer for the token start, got ~e" new-token-start))
|
||||
(unless (exact-nonnegative-integer? new-token-end)
|
||||
(unless (exact-positive-integer? new-token-end)
|
||||
(error 'color:text<%> "expected an exact nonnegative integer for the token end, got ~e" new-token-end))
|
||||
(unless (exact-nonnegative-integer? backup-delta)
|
||||
(error 'color:text<%> "expected an exact nonnegative integer for the backup delta, got ~e" backup-delta))
|
||||
|
@ -347,13 +347,13 @@ added get-regions
|
|||
(error 'color:text<%>
|
||||
"expected the distance between the start and end position for each token to be positive, but start was ~e and end was ~e"
|
||||
new-token-start new-token-end))
|
||||
(unless (<= pos-before new-token-start pos-after)
|
||||
(error 'color:text<%>
|
||||
"expected the token start to be between ~s and ~s, got ~s" pos-before pos-after new-token-start))
|
||||
(unless (<= pos-before new-token-end pos-after)
|
||||
(error 'color:text<%>
|
||||
"expected the token end to be between ~s and ~s, got ~s" pos-before pos-after new-token-end))
|
||||
(let ((len (- new-token-end new-token-start)))
|
||||
#;
|
||||
(unless (= len (- pos-after pos-before))
|
||||
;; this check requires the two calls to port-next-location to be also uncommented
|
||||
;; when this check fails, bad things can happen non-deterministically later on
|
||||
(eprintf "pos changed bad ; len ~s pos-before ~s pos-after ~s (token ~s mode ~s)\n"
|
||||
len pos-before pos-after lexeme new-lexer-mode))
|
||||
(set-lexer-state-current-pos! ls (+ len (lexer-state-current-pos ls)))
|
||||
(set-lexer-state-current-lexer-mode! ls new-lexer-mode)
|
||||
(sync-invalid ls)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user