fix break checking on continuation applciation

Racket did not check for a break when escaping from a break-disabled
context to a break-enabled context. RacketCS didn't check in other
cases, either. Fix those various cases.

pkgs/racket-test-core/tests/racket/sync.rktl

@@ -1235,7 +1235,8 @@
 	     should-post-break?
 	     should-done-break?)
       ;; print the state for this test:
-      (test #t list? (list 'go 
+      (test #t list? (list 'go
+                           mk-t* break-off?
 			   pre-thunk act-thunk post-thunk
 			   pre-semaphore-wait act-semaphore-wait post-semaphore-wait
 			   try-pre-break 
@@ -1354,8 +1355,8 @@
 				       no-capture no-capture no-capture
 				       args))))])
        (list plain-mk-t
-	     (mk-capturing 'pre)
-	     (mk-capturing 'act))))))
+	     (procedure-rename (mk-capturing 'pre) 'pre-capturing)
+	     (procedure-rename (mk-capturing 'act) 'act-capturing))))))
 
 ;; ----------------------------------------
 ;; Check wrap-evt result superceded by internally

pkgs/racket-test-core/tests/racket/thread.rktl

@@ -197,6 +197,49 @@
 (err/rt-test (break-thread (current-thread) 'hang-up) exn:break:hang-up?)
 (err/rt-test (break-thread (current-thread) 'terminate) exn:break:terminate?)
 
+(let ([bad? #f])
+  (define t
+    (thread
+     (lambda ()
+       (let/ec k
+         (parameterize-break #f
+           (break-thread (current-thread))
+           (k #f)))
+       (set! bad? #t))))
+  (sync t)
+  (test #f 'escape bad?))
+
+(let ([bad? #f])
+  (define t
+    (thread
+     (lambda ()
+       (let/cc k
+         (parameterize-break #f
+           (break-thread (current-thread))
+           (k #f)))
+       (set! bad? #t))))
+  (sync t)
+  (test #f 'escape/cc bad?))
+
+(let ([bad? #f])
+  (define t
+    (thread
+     (lambda ()
+       (define jump-k #f)
+       (parameterize-break #f
+         ((let/cc k
+            (set! jump-k k)
+            void)
+          #f))
+       (let/cc k
+         (parameterize-break #f
+           (break-thread (current-thread))
+           (jump-k k)))
+       (set! bad? #t))))
+  (sync t)
+  (test #f 'jump-in bad?))
+
+
 (let ([ex? #f]
       [s (make-semaphore)])
   (define (go)

racket/src/cs/rumble/control.ss

@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@
                [(aborting? r)
                 ;; Remove the prompt as we call the handler:
                 (pop-metacontinuation-frame)
-                (end-uninterrupted 'handle)
+                (end-uninterrupted/call-hook 'handle)
                 (apply handler
                        (aborting-args r))]
                [else
@@ -888,11 +888,7 @@
 ;; Called on the arguments to return to a continuation
 ;; captured by `call/cc/end-uninterrupted`:
 (define (end-uninterrupted-with-values args)
-  ;; Arguably, we should use `end-uninterrupted/hook` here to check
-  ;; for breaks, in case a jump enabled breaks and one is pending.
-  ;; The traditional Racket implementation doesn't include that
-  ;; check, and the check imposes a costs, so we leave it out for now.
-  (end-uninterrupted 'cc)
+  (end-uninterrupted/call-hook 'cc)
   (apply values args))
 
 (define (current-mark-chain)

racket/src/racket/src/fun.c

@@ -4276,6 +4276,7 @@ do_call_ec (int argc, Scheme_Object *argv[], Scheme_Object *_for_cc)
       reset_cjs(&p2->cjs);
       scheme_restore_env_stack_w_thread(cont->envss, p2);
       p2->suspend_break = 0;
+      scheme_check_break_now();
       if (n != 1)
         v = scheme_values(n, (Scheme_Object **)v);
     } else {

racket/src/thread/thread.rkt

@@ -725,7 +725,11 @@
 ;; `check-for-break` should be called.
 (define (check-for-break)
   (define t (current-thread))
-  (when t ; allow `check-for-break` before threads are running
+  (when (and
+         ;; allow `check-for-break` before threads are running:
+         t
+         ;; quick pre-test before going atomic:
+         (thread-pending-break t))
     ((atomically
       (cond
         [(and (thread-pending-break t)