Revise license page with the clarification text that was sent on the list.
(Slightly revised.)
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed2b579e3c
commit
2fa345ef9e
|
@ -110,15 +110,44 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(define license
|
(define license
|
||||||
@page[#:title "Software License" #:part-of 'download]{
|
@page[#:title "Software License" #:part-of 'download]{
|
||||||
@p{Racket is distributed under the
|
@p*{
|
||||||
|
@~ Racket is distributed under the
|
||||||
@a[href: "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html#SEC1"]{
|
@a[href: "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html#SEC1"]{
|
||||||
GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)}.
|
GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)}.
|
||||||
This means that you can link parts of Racket (such as racket or gracket)
|
@~ Our primary goal is to help as many people as possible use and
|
||||||
into proprietary applications, provided that you follow the specific
|
contribute to Racket. We encourage anyone to develop any kind of
|
||||||
rules stated in the LGPL. You can also modify Racket software; if you
|
software, with any kind of license, using Racket.
|
||||||
distribute a modified version, you must distribute it under the terms of
|
@~ We have chosen the LGPL as the license for Racket, which makes it
|
||||||
the LGPL, which in particular means that you must release the source
|
possible for for people to create software with Racket, and to allow us
|
||||||
code for the modified Racket software.}})
|
to build on existing libraries that use the LGPL, such as the Lightning
|
||||||
|
assembler and the GMP math library. The basic requirement of the LGPL
|
||||||
|
is that you make your changes to Racket available, and that you let
|
||||||
|
other people use your software with new versions of Racket.
|
||||||
|
@~ Since the LGPL license that Racket uses was originally designed for C
|
||||||
|
programs, parts of it require some interpretation to apply to Racket in
|
||||||
|
detail. The following is how the Racket maintainers interpret the
|
||||||
|
license.
|
||||||
|
@~ @ul*{
|
||||||
|
@~ First, if you distribute your Racket application in source form or as
|
||||||
|
compiled bytecode files, the Racket license does not restrict you at
|
||||||
|
all.
|
||||||
|
@~ Second, if you distribute your Racket application as compiled binary
|
||||||
|
generated by @tt{raco exe}, there are no requirements placed on the
|
||||||
|
licensing of your software. However, the LGPL requires that you make
|
||||||
|
it possible to re-link your software with modified versions of
|
||||||
|
Racket. This means, basically, that you need to provide the compiled
|
||||||
|
bytecode files used to produce the compiled binary, if requested by
|
||||||
|
someone who got your software from you. Note that this does @em{not}
|
||||||
|
mean that your software has to be made open source, nor do you have
|
||||||
|
to give the source code to anyone, nor do you have to make the
|
||||||
|
compiled bytecode files available to the public or let other people
|
||||||
|
redistribute them. Furthermore, this is not revealing any more of
|
||||||
|
your source code than the @tt{raco exe} format, since the bytecode is
|
||||||
|
embedded in an extractable way in the resulting executable.}
|
||||||
|
@~ We are, of course, not lawyers, and this should not be taken as legal
|
||||||
|
advice. However, we wanted to make it clear that Racket is an
|
||||||
|
appropriate building block for all kinds of software, and to clarify how
|
||||||
|
we view the license of Racket.}})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(define downloader-script
|
(define downloader-script
|
||||||
@script/inline[type: 'text/javascript]{@||
|
@script/inline[type: 'text/javascript]{@||
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user