From 333f602a708635c126b7e83bdd0101e228789425 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Butterick Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:34:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Improve `assq` example MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Let me `assq` something: doesn’t it seem inapt to demonstrate this function with integers, when `eq?` doesn’t give consistent results for numbers? --- pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/pairs.scrbl | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/pairs.scrbl b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/pairs.scrbl index efadbeeb97..b15b349cb5 100644 --- a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/pairs.scrbl +++ b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/pairs.scrbl @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ Like @racket[assoc], but finds an element using @racket[eqv?]. Like @racket[assoc], but finds an element using @racket[eq?]. @mz-examples[ - (assq 3 (list (list 1 2) (list 3 4) (list 5 6)))]} + (assq 'c (list (list 'a 'b) (list 'c 'd) (list 'e 'f)))]} @defproc[(assf [proc procedure?] [lst list?])