new entry in design notes
This commit is contained in:
parent
b51626933c
commit
372fe0e113
|
@ -912,3 +912,18 @@ harder than I expected. Don't ask me about lazy scheme. Or Advanced. Grr!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**************
|
**************
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Okay, you can ask me about lazy scheme now. Err, lazy racket. The answer
|
||||||
|
is simple: Stephen Chang is working on it :). I'm back in here trying to
|
||||||
|
figure out why I changed to stepper-syntax-property, and I think the
|
||||||
|
answer is that Back In The Day, it wasn't possible to extract all of the
|
||||||
|
syntax properties associated with the stepper. Hmm... actually, maybe I
|
||||||
|
should leave this alone; do I want programs to be able to mangle their
|
||||||
|
own stepper marks? No, probably not.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Other changes on the GUI side: the stepper now eagerly precomputes
|
||||||
|
steps, rather than doing a complex back-and-forth locking; this is less
|
||||||
|
code, and works better, too.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Nice to be here again...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2010-12-04
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user