Fixed the duplicate identifier bug in match-define-values and changed identifiers to conform to naming conventions.

This commit is contained in:
James Ian Johnson 2011-08-31 11:45:28 -04:00 committed by Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
parent dc61372f3c
commit 3f23a67d57
3 changed files with 34 additions and 59 deletions

View File

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
(require (for-syntax scheme/base
racket/syntax
(only-in racket/list append* append-map)
(only-in racket/list append* remove-duplicates)
unstable/sequence
syntax/parse
"parse.rkt"
@ -12,30 +12,6 @@
(provide define-forms)
;; each pat matches a value in a multi-valued expression
(define-for-syntax (match-values-clause->let-clause pats rhs)
(with-syntax ([(pats ...) pats]
[(ids ...) (generate-temporaries pats)])
;; rhs evaluates to number of ids values.
;; patterns should match against each id.
(values #'(ids ...)
#`[(ids ...) #,rhs])))
(define-for-syntax (match-values-clauses->let-clauses patses rhses)
(for/lists (idses let-clauses)
([pats (syntax->list patses)]
[rhs (syntax->list rhses)])
(match-values-clause->let-clause pats rhs)))
(define-for-syntax (all-same-length stx-listses)
(let loop ([listses (syntax->list stx-listses)]
[the-length #f])
(cond [(null? listses) #t]
[the-length
(and (= the-length (length (syntax->list (car listses))))
(loop (cdr listses) the-length))]
[else (loop (cdr listses) (length (syntax->list (car listses))))])))
(define-syntax-rule (define-forms parse-id
match match* match-lambda match-lambda*
match-lambda** match-let match-let*
@ -70,13 +46,10 @@
(define-syntax (match/values stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ arg:expr [(pats ...) rhs:expr] [(patses ...) rhses:expr] ...)
#:fail-unless (all-same-length #'((pats ...) (patses ...) ...))
"All clauses must have the same number of patterns"
(define-values (ids let-clause)
(match-values-clause->let-clause #'(pats ...) #'rhs))
#`(let-values ([#,ids arg])
(match*/derived #,ids #,stx [(pats ...) rhs] [(patses ...) rhses] ...))]))
[(_ arg:expr [(pats ...) rhs:expr] [(patss ...) rhss:expr] ...)
(with-syntax ([(ids ...) (generate-temporaries #'(pats ...))])
#`(let-values ([(ids ...) arg])
(match*/derived (ids ...) #,stx [(pats ...) rhs] [(patss ...) rhss] ...)))]))
(define-syntax (match-lambda stx)
(syntax-parse stx
@ -102,25 +75,27 @@
(define-syntax (match-let-values stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ (~and clauses ([(patses ...) rhses:expr] ...)) body1 body ...)
(define-values (idses let-clauses)
(match-values-clauses->let-clauses #'((patses ...) ...) #'(rhses ...)))
[(_ (~and clauses ([(patss ...) rhss:expr] ...)) body1 body ...)
(define-values (idss let-clauses)
(for/lists (idss let-clauses)
([pats (syntax->list #'((patss ...) ...))]
[rhs (syntax->list #'(rhss ...))])
(define ids (generate-temporaries pats))
(values ids #`[#,ids #,rhs])))
#`(let-values #,let-clauses
(match*/derived #,(append-map syntax->list idses) #,stx
[(patses ... ...)
(let () body1 body ...)]))]))
(match*/derived #,(append* idss) #,stx
[(patss ... ...) (let () body1 body ...)]))]))
(define-syntax (match-let*-values stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ () body1 body ...)
#'(let () body1 body ...)]
[(_ ([(pats ...) rhs] rest-pats ...) body1 body ...)
(define-values (ids let-clause)
(match-values-clause->let-clause #'(pats ...) #'rhs))
#`(let-values (#,let-clause)
(match*/derived #,ids #,stx
(with-syntax ([(ids ...) (generate-temporaries #'(pats ...))])
#`(let-values ([(ids ...) rhs])
(match*/derived (ids ...) #,stx
[(pats ...) #,(syntax/loc stx (match-let*-values (rest-pats ...)
body1 body ...))]))]))
body1 body ...))])))]))
;; there's lots of duplication here to handle named let
;; some factoring out would do a lot of good
@ -162,15 +137,13 @@
(define-syntax (match-define-values stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ (pats ...) rhs:expr)
(define ppats (map parse-id (syntax->list #'(pats ...))))
(define bound-vars-list (map bound-vars ppats))
(with-syntax ([(ids ...) (generate-temporaries #'(pats ...))]
[(pat-vars ...) bound-vars-list]
[vars (append* bound-vars-list)])
(define bound-vars-list (remove-duplicates
(foldr (λ (pat vars)
(append (bound-vars (parse-id pat)) vars))
'() (syntax->list #'(pats ...)))
bound-identifier=?))
(with-syntax ([(ids ...) (generate-temporaries #'(pats ...))])
(quasisyntax/loc stx
(define-values vars
(let-values ([(ids ...) rhs])
(apply values
(append
(match*/derived (ids) #,stx
[(pats) (list . pat-vars)]) ...))))))])))))
(define-values #,bound-vars-list
(match/values rhs
[(pats ...) (values . #,bound-vars-list)]))))])))))

View File

@ -444,9 +444,11 @@ matching against the result of @racket[expr].
b
]}
@defform[(match-define-values (pat ...) expr)]{
@defform[(match-define-values (pat pats ...) expr)]{
Like @racket[match-define] but for when expr produces multiple values.
Like match/values, it requires at least one pattern to determine the
number of values to expect.
@examples[
#:eval match-eval

View File

@ -675,13 +675,13 @@
(comp '(1 2 4)
(call-with-values
(λ () (match-let-values ([(x y) (values 1 2)] [(3 w) (values 3 4)])
(list x y w)))
(values x y w)))
list))
(comp '(1 3 4)
(call-with-values
(λ () (match-let*-values ([(x y) (values 1 2)] [(y w) (values 3 4)])
(list x y w)))
(values x y w)))
list))
(comp '(1 2 3)