suzanne.soy/racket
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Propagated contract documentation change for regexp-match from bug 10301 to related functions.

Browse Source 
svn: r15136
This commit is contained in:
Carl Eastlund 2009-06-10 23:05:45 +00:00
parent 33da679c31
commit 44505e77e3
1 changed files with 19 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
collects/scribblings/reference/regexps.scrbl
View File

@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ port).
[start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0] [start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0]
[end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f] [end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f]
[output-port (or/c output-port? #f) #f]) [output-port (or/c output-port? #f) #f])
(or/c (listof (or/c string? #f)) (or/c (cons/c string? (listof (or/c string? #f)))
(listof (or/c bytes? #f)) (cons/c bytes? (listof (or/c bytes? #f)))
#f)]{ #f)]{
Like @scheme[regexp-match] on input ports, except that if the match Like @scheme[regexp-match] on input ports, except that if the match
@ -357,9 +357,11 @@ fails.}
[start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0] [start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0]
[end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f] [end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f]
[output-port (or/c output-port? #f) #f]) [output-port (or/c output-port? #f) #f])
(or/c (listof (or/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer? (or/c (cons/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer?
exact-nonnegative-integer?) exact-nonnegative-integer?)
#f)) (listof (or/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer?
exact-nonnegative-integer?)
#f)))
#f)]{ #f)]{
Like @scheme[regexp-match], but returns a list of number pairs (and Like @scheme[regexp-match], but returns a list of number pairs (and
@ -432,7 +434,7 @@ entire content of @scheme[input] matches @scheme[pattern].
[start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0] [start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0]
[end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f] [end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f]
[progress (or/c evt #f) #f]) [progress (or/c evt #f) #f])
(or/c (listof (or/c bytes? #f)) (or/c (cons/c bytes? (listof (or/c bytes? #f)))
#f)]{ #f)]{
Like @scheme[regexp-match] on input ports, but only peeks bytes from Like @scheme[regexp-match] on input ports, but only peeks bytes from
@ -461,9 +463,11 @@ information if another process meanwhile reads from
[start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0] [start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0]
[end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f] [end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f]
[progress (or/c evt #f) #f]) [progress (or/c evt #f) #f])
(or/c (listof (or/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer? (or/c (cons/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer?
exact-nonnegative-integer?) exact-nonnegative-integer?)
#f)) (listof (or/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer?
exact-nonnegative-integer?)
#f)))
#f)]{ #f)]{
Like @scheme[regexp-match-positions] on input ports, but only peeks Like @scheme[regexp-match-positions] on input ports, but only peeks
@ -476,7 +480,7 @@ bytes from @scheme[input-port] instead of reading them, and with a
[start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0] [start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0]
[end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f] [end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f]
[progress (or/c evt #f) #f]) [progress (or/c evt #f) #f])
(or/c (listof (or/c bytes? #f)) (or/c (cons/c bytes? (listof (or/c bytes? #f)))
#f)]{ #f)]{
Like @scheme[regexp-match-peek], but it attempts to match only bytes Like @scheme[regexp-match-peek], but it attempts to match only bytes
@ -490,9 +494,11 @@ match fails if not-yet-available characters might be used to match
[start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0] [start-pos exact-nonnegative-integer? 0]
[end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f] [end-pos (or/c exact-nonnegative-integer? #f) #f]
[progress (or/c evt #f) #f]) [progress (or/c evt #f) #f])
(or/c (listof (or/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer? (or/c (cons/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer?
exact-nonnegative-integer?) exact-nonnegative-integer?)
#f)) (listof (or/c (cons/c exact-nonnegative-integer?
exact-nonnegative-integer?)
#f)))
#f)]{ #f)]{
Like @scheme[regexp-match-peek-positions], but it attempts to match Like @scheme[regexp-match-peek-positions], but it attempts to match