suzanne.soy/racket
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

minor guide corrections

Browse Source 
on parts that Eli asked me to check
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Flatt 2012-06-15 05:29:28 +08:00
parent 1e4186098e
commit 4eb0d3dcac
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
collects/scribblings/guide/named-let.scrbl
View File

@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ same syntactic keyword @racket[let] as for local binding, but an
identifier after the @racket[let] (instead of an immediate open
parenthesis) triggers a different parsing.
@racketblock[
(let _proc-id ([_arg-id _init-expr] ...)
_body ...+)
@specform[
(let proc-id ([arg-id init-expr] ...)
body ...+)
]
A named @racket[let] form is equivalent to

2
collects/scribblings/guide/syntax-taints.scrbl
View File

@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ with a @deftech{dye pack}. When a syntax object is armed, then
@racket[syntax-e] taints any syntax object in its result. Similarly,
@racket[datum->syntax] taints its result when its first argument is
armed. Finally, if any part of a quoted syntax object is armed, then
the corresponding part taints the resulting syntax constant.
the corresponding part is tainted in the resulting syntax constant.
Of course, the macro expander itself must be able to @deftech{disarm}
a taint on a syntax object, so that it can further expand an