From 53edc9f2580f328453093f84e42569242248819e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Flatt Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:01:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] improve docs for `identifier-binding-symbol` Closes PR 14659 --- .../racket-doc/scribblings/reference/stx-comp.scrbl | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/stx-comp.scrbl b/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/stx-comp.scrbl index a8293fc1b1..762da318bf 100644 --- a/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/stx-comp.scrbl +++ b/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/stx-comp.scrbl @@ -227,7 +227,10 @@ Same as @racket[(identifier-binding id-stx #f)].} Like @racket[identifier-binding], but produces a symbol that corresponds to the binding. The symbol result is the same for any -identifiers that are @racket[free-identifier=?]. +identifiers that are @racket[free-identifier=?], but the result may +also be the same for identifiers that are not +@racket[free-identifier=?] (i.e., different symbols imply different +bindings, but the same symbol does not imply the same binding). When @racket[identifier-binding] would produce a list, then the second element of that list is the result that