fix overzealous replacement of "Scheme" with "Racket" in quick
but a more extensive rewrite is probably warranted
This commit is contained in:
parent
05f93bfc28
commit
6b24320ea7
|
@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ that's how a frame manages its children by default.
|
||||||
@section{Where to Go From Here}
|
@section{Where to Go From Here}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This introduction to Racket purposely avoids many of the
|
This introduction to Racket purposely avoids many of the
|
||||||
traditional ways of introducing and distinguishing Lisp or Racket:
|
traditional ways of introducing and distinguishing Lisp or Scheme:
|
||||||
prefix arithmetic notation, symbols, quoting and quasiquoting lists,
|
prefix arithmetic notation, symbols, quoting and quasiquoting lists,
|
||||||
@racket[eval], first-class continuations, and the idea that all syntax
|
@racket[eval], first-class continuations, and the idea that all syntax
|
||||||
is really just a @racket[lambda] in disguise. While those are all part
|
is really just a @racket[lambda] in disguise. While those are all part
|
||||||
|
@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ in Racket.
|
||||||
Instead, Racket programmers typically program with functions,
|
Instead, Racket programmers typically program with functions,
|
||||||
records, objects, exceptions, regular expressions, modules, and
|
records, objects, exceptions, regular expressions, modules, and
|
||||||
threads. That is, instead of a ``minimalist'' language---which is the
|
threads. That is, instead of a ``minimalist'' language---which is the
|
||||||
way that Racket is often described---Racket offers a rich language
|
way that Scheme is often described---Racket offers a rich language
|
||||||
with an extensive set of libraries and tools.
|
with an extensive set of libraries and tools.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you are new to programming or if you have the patience to work
|
If you are new to programming or if you have the patience to work
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user