fix overzealous replacement of "Scheme" with "Racket" in quick

but a more extensive rewrite is probably warranted
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Flatt 2010-06-07 19:02:20 -04:00
parent 05f93bfc28
commit 6b24320ea7

View File

@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ that's how a frame manages its children by default.
@section{Where to Go From Here} @section{Where to Go From Here}
This introduction to Racket purposely avoids many of the This introduction to Racket purposely avoids many of the
traditional ways of introducing and distinguishing Lisp or Racket: traditional ways of introducing and distinguishing Lisp or Scheme:
prefix arithmetic notation, symbols, quoting and quasiquoting lists, prefix arithmetic notation, symbols, quoting and quasiquoting lists,
@racket[eval], first-class continuations, and the idea that all syntax @racket[eval], first-class continuations, and the idea that all syntax
is really just a @racket[lambda] in disguise. While those are all part is really just a @racket[lambda] in disguise. While those are all part
@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ in Racket.
Instead, Racket programmers typically program with functions, Instead, Racket programmers typically program with functions,
records, objects, exceptions, regular expressions, modules, and records, objects, exceptions, regular expressions, modules, and
threads. That is, instead of a ``minimalist'' language---which is the threads. That is, instead of a ``minimalist'' language---which is the
way that Racket is often described---Racket offers a rich language way that Scheme is often described---Racket offers a rich language
with an extensive set of libraries and tools. with an extensive set of libraries and tools.
If you are new to programming or if you have the patience to work If you are new to programming or if you have the patience to work