typo in doc for make-syntax-delta-introducer

I'm not sure about the _m-id_ part but I think this is what the docs are trying to say.
This commit is contained in:
Stephen Chang 2015-10-27 13:51:39 -04:00 committed by Matthew Flatt
parent b5224743b8
commit 83c4a2a19c

View File

@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ and different result procedures use distinct scopes.
added the optional operation argument
in the result procedure.}]}
@defproc[(make-syntax-delta-introducer [ext-stx syntax?]
@defproc[(make-syntax-delta-introducer [ext-stx identifier?]
[base-stx (or/c syntax? #f)]
[phase-level (or/c #f exact-integer?)
(syntax-local-phase-level)])
@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ Produces a procedure that behaves like the result of
@racket[make-syntax-introducer], but using the @tech{scopes} of
@racket[ext-stx] that are not shared with @racket[base-stx].
This procedure is potentially useful when @racket[_m-id] has a
This procedure is potentially useful when some @racket[_m-id] has a
transformer binding that records some @racket[_orig-id], and a use of
@racket[_m-id] introduces a binding of @racket[_orig-id]. In that
case, the @tech{scopes} one the use of @racket[_m-id] added since the