doc: Fix some typos

This commit is contained in:
Štěpán Němec 2020-03-01 09:59:50 +01:00 committed by Matthew Flatt
parent 098a784b88
commit 95b9f0e210
5 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ the way they are implemented and used: A @tech{character} in the
Latin-1 range is always reachable, because @racket[equal?] Latin-1
characters are always @racket[eq?], and all of the Latin-1 characters
are referenced by an internal module. Similarly, @racket[null],
@racket[#t], @racket[#f], @racket[eof], and @|void-const| and are
@racket[#t], @racket[#f], @racket[eof], and @|void-const| are
always reachable. Values produced by @racket[quote] remain reachable
when the @racket[quote] expression itself is reachable.

View File

@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ An @racket[accum-id] and a binding from a @racket[for-clause] can be
the same identifier. In that case, the @racket[accum-id] binding
shadows the one in a @racket[for-clause] within the
@racket[body-or-break] and @racket[body] forms (even though,
syntactically, a @racket[for-clause] is closer to to the body).
syntactically, a @racket[for-clause] is closer to the body).
@examples[
(for/fold ([sum 0]

View File

@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ the identifier refers to the binding whose set is a superset of all
others; if no such binding exists, the reference is ambiguous (and triggers a syntax
error if it is parsed as an expression). A binding @deftech{shadows}
any @tech{binding} (i.e., it is @deftech{shadowing} any @tech{binding})
that the same symbol but a subset of scopes.
with the same symbol but a subset of scopes.
For example, in

View File

@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ because the check is associated with the entire
have the same progress, and yet only the first one is reported. The
difference between the two is that the first error is from a
@emph{post-traversal} check, whereas the second is from a normal
(i.e., pre-traversal) check. A post-traveral check is considered to
(i.e., pre-traversal) check. A post-traversal check is considered to
have made more progress than a pre-traversal check of the same term;
indeed, it also has greater progress than any failure @emph{within}
the term.

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ table. There are four main kinds of syntax pattern:
@item{@tech{@Apatterns}, abbreviated @svar[A-pattern]}
]
A fifth kind, @tech{@Lpatterns} (abbreviated
@svar[L-pattern]), is a just a syntactically restricted subset of
@svar[L-pattern]), is just a syntactically restricted subset of
@tech{@Spatterns}.
When a special form in this manual refers to @svar[syntax-pattern]