doc: Fix some typos
This commit is contained in:
parent
098a784b88
commit
95b9f0e210
|
@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ the way they are implemented and used: A @tech{character} in the
|
|||
Latin-1 range is always reachable, because @racket[equal?] Latin-1
|
||||
characters are always @racket[eq?], and all of the Latin-1 characters
|
||||
are referenced by an internal module. Similarly, @racket[null],
|
||||
@racket[#t], @racket[#f], @racket[eof], and @|void-const| and are
|
||||
@racket[#t], @racket[#f], @racket[eof], and @|void-const| are
|
||||
always reachable. Values produced by @racket[quote] remain reachable
|
||||
when the @racket[quote] expression itself is reachable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ An @racket[accum-id] and a binding from a @racket[for-clause] can be
|
|||
the same identifier. In that case, the @racket[accum-id] binding
|
||||
shadows the one in a @racket[for-clause] within the
|
||||
@racket[body-or-break] and @racket[body] forms (even though,
|
||||
syntactically, a @racket[for-clause] is closer to to the body).
|
||||
syntactically, a @racket[for-clause] is closer to the body).
|
||||
|
||||
@examples[
|
||||
(for/fold ([sum 0]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ the identifier refers to the binding whose set is a superset of all
|
|||
others; if no such binding exists, the reference is ambiguous (and triggers a syntax
|
||||
error if it is parsed as an expression). A binding @deftech{shadows}
|
||||
any @tech{binding} (i.e., it is @deftech{shadowing} any @tech{binding})
|
||||
that the same symbol but a subset of scopes.
|
||||
with the same symbol but a subset of scopes.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, in
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ because the check is associated with the entire
|
|||
have the same progress, and yet only the first one is reported. The
|
||||
difference between the two is that the first error is from a
|
||||
@emph{post-traversal} check, whereas the second is from a normal
|
||||
(i.e., pre-traversal) check. A post-traveral check is considered to
|
||||
(i.e., pre-traversal) check. A post-traversal check is considered to
|
||||
have made more progress than a pre-traversal check of the same term;
|
||||
indeed, it also has greater progress than any failure @emph{within}
|
||||
the term.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ table. There are four main kinds of syntax pattern:
|
|||
@item{@tech{@Apatterns}, abbreviated @svar[A-pattern]}
|
||||
]
|
||||
A fifth kind, @tech{@Lpatterns} (abbreviated
|
||||
@svar[L-pattern]), is a just a syntactically restricted subset of
|
||||
@svar[L-pattern]), is just a syntactically restricted subset of
|
||||
@tech{@Spatterns}.
|
||||
|
||||
When a special form in this manual refers to @svar[syntax-pattern]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user