From 9e38074a6015a18ccc7062b02028b741c6146ba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eli Barzilay Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:01:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] add #:indent to verbatim svn: r8707 original commit: 6f0ce914614ae5a840bcdeed225583ad4f4b1692 --- pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/style/scribble.scrbl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/style/scribble.scrbl b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/style/scribble.scrbl index 7f852c7f57..075a1ee1a8 100644 --- a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/style/scribble.scrbl +++ b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/style/scribble.scrbl @@ -57,14 +57,14 @@ when using @scheme[scheme], especially outside of @scheme[defproc] or @scheme[defform]. Prefix a meta-variable with @litchar{_}; for example, -@verbatim|{ @scheme[(rator-expr rand-expr ...)]}| +@verbatim[#:indent 2]|{@scheme[(rator-expr rand-expr ...)]}| would be the wrong way to refer to the grammar of a function call, because it produces @scheme[(rator-expr rand-expr ...)], where @schemeidfont{rator-expr} and @schemeidfont{rand-expr} are typeset as variables. The correct description is -@verbatim|{ @scheme[(_rator-expr _rand-expr ...)]}| +@verbatim[#:indent 2]|{@scheme[(_rator-expr _rand-expr ...)]}| which produces @scheme[(_rator-expr _rand-expr ...)], where @schemeidfont{rator-expr} @schemeidfont{rand-expr} are typeset as