From 9f1c2147be892ee55bc286aafa5f26a873a595e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@racket-lang.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 07:05:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] refine comment that is possibly misleading  on code that
 might not turn out to be useful

---
 src/racket/src/eval.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/racket/src/eval.c b/src/racket/src/eval.c
index 3847000fba..0cebf4e839 100644
--- a/src/racket/src/eval.c
+++ b/src/racket/src/eval.c
@@ -427,11 +427,11 @@ scheme_handle_stack_overflow(Scheme_Object *(*k)(void))
 }
 
 #ifdef LINUX_FIND_STACK_BASE
-uintptr_t adjust_stack_base(uintptr_t bnd) {
+static uintptr_t adjust_stack_base(uintptr_t bnd) {
   if (bnd == scheme_get_primordial_thread_stack_base()) {
     /* The address `base' might be far from the actual stack base
-       if Exec Sheild is enabled. Use "/proc/self/maps" to get 
-       exacty the stack base. */
+       if Exec Shield is enabled (in some versions)? Use 
+       "/proc/self/maps" to get exactly the stack base. */
     FILE *f;
     char *buf;
     f = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");