From 9f34be4b837c677504779625cdd8110698472222 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Caldwell Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:54:37 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] fix typo (#1620) --- pkgs/racket-doc/syntax/scribblings/parse/intro.scrbl | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pkgs/racket-doc/syntax/scribblings/parse/intro.scrbl b/pkgs/racket-doc/syntax/scribblings/parse/intro.scrbl index 28df9d80b1..0e380aabb9 100644 --- a/pkgs/racket-doc/syntax/scribblings/parse/intro.scrbl +++ b/pkgs/racket-doc/syntax/scribblings/parse/intro.scrbl @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ verify that the named-@racket[let] syntax is working, that How does @racket[syntax-parse] decide which clause the programmer was attempting, so it can use it as a basis for error reporting? After all, each of the bad uses of the named-@racket[let] syntax are also -bad uses of the normal syntax, and vice versa. And yet the macro doen +bad uses of the normal syntax, and vice versa. And yet the macro does not produce errors like ``@racket[mylet]: expected sequence of distinct binding pairs at: @racket[loop].''