Change this to match how the error messages now come across.

svn: r13125
This commit is contained in:
Stevie Strickland 2009-01-14 21:39:43 +00:00
parent c7ee5b600c
commit a4165d14b4

View File

@ -98,8 +98,8 @@
(and (exn? exn)
(,has-proper-blame? (exn-message exn))))))))))
(define (test/pos-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "module pos"))
(define (test/neg-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "module neg"))
(define (test/pos-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "pos"))
(define (test/neg-blame name expression) (test/spec-failed name expression "neg"))
(define (test/well-formed stx)
(contract-eval
@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
(contract-eval `(,test #t flat-contract? ,contract))
(test/spec-failed (format "~a fail" name)
`(contract ,contract ',fail 'pos 'neg)
"module pos")
"pos")
(test/spec-passed/result
(format "~a pass" name)
`(contract ,contract ',pass 'pos 'neg)
@ -2190,28 +2190,28 @@
'(let ()
(define/contract i integer? #t)
i)
"definition i")
"(definition i)")
(test/spec-failed
'define/contract3
'(let ()
(define/contract i (-> integer? integer?) (lambda (x) #t))
(i 1))
"definition i")
"(definition i)")
(test/spec-failed
'define/contract4
'(let ()
(define/contract i (-> integer? integer?) (lambda (x) 1))
(i #f))
"module top-level")
"top-level")
(test/spec-failed
'define/contract5
'(let ()
(define/contract (i x) (-> integer? integer?) 1)
(i #f))
"module top-level")
"top-level")
(test/spec-passed
'define/contract6
@ -2251,7 +2251,7 @@
(+ m 1))
(b (zero? n)))
(a 5))
"function a")
"(function a)")
(test/spec-failed
'define/contract10
@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@
#t)
(b (add1 n)))
(a 5))
"function b")
"(function b)")
(test/spec-passed
'define/contract11
@ -2286,7 +2286,7 @@
(-> boolean? number? number?)
(if b (f m) (f #t)))
(g #f 3))
"function g")
"(function g)")
(test/spec-failed
'define/contract13
@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@
(+ n 1))
(foo-dc13 #t)))
(eval '(require 'foo-dc13)))
"module 'foo-dc13")
"'foo-dc13")
(test/spec-failed
'define/contract14
@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@
(require 'foo-dc14)
(foo-dc14 #t)))
(eval '(require 'bar-dc14)))
"module 'bar-dc14")
"'bar-dc14")
(test/spec-failed
'define/contract15
@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@
(+ n 1))))
(eval '(require 'foo-dc15))
(eval '(foo-dc15 #t)))
"module top-level")
"top-level")
;
@ -2370,7 +2370,7 @@
(define (even? n)
(if (zero? n) #t (odd? (sub1 n)))))
(odd? #t))
"module top-level")
"top-level")
(test/spec-failed
'with-contract3
@ -2383,7 +2383,7 @@
(define (even? n)
(if (zero? n) #t (odd? (sub1 n)))))
(odd? 4))
"region odd-even")
"(region odd-even)")
;; Functions within the same with-contract region can call
;; each other however they want, so here we have even?
@ -5691,7 +5691,7 @@ so that propagation occurs.
(provide/contract (x integer?))))
(eval '(require 'contract-test-suite3))
(eval 'x))
"module 'contract-test-suite3")
"'contract-test-suite3")
(test/spec-passed
'provide/contract4
@ -5868,7 +5868,7 @@ so that propagation occurs.
(make-s 1 2)
[s-a #f])))
(eval '(require 'pc11b-n)))
"module 'n")
"'n")
|#
(test/spec-passed
@ -5936,7 +5936,7 @@ so that propagation occurs.
(define i #f)
(provide/contract [i integer?])))
(eval '(require 'pos)))
"module 'pos")
"'pos")
;; this is really a positive violation, but name the module `neg' just for an addl test
(test/spec-failed
@ -5947,7 +5947,7 @@ so that propagation occurs.
(define i #f)
(provide/contract [i integer?])))
(eval '(require 'neg)))
"module 'neg")
"'neg")
;; this test doesn't pass yet ... waiting for support from define-struct