Just tried the following program:

#lang typed-scheme

(require/typed
  srfi/1
  (fold (All (a b) ((a b -> b) b (Listof a) -> b))))

And got an error because (orig-module-stx) was #f.  I'm not sure whether
it should have been or not, but I've fixed up this to handle that case
(having it just use the normal error message when that's #f, as I'm not
sure whether the error message would be correct otherwise).

However, it might just be that (orig-module-stx) should have not been
#f, in which case this should be checked out.
This commit is contained in:
Stevie Strickland 2008-07-13 21:47:36 -04:00
parent 2456dcc18b
commit b991505297

View File

@ -85,9 +85,12 @@
(let ([stx (locate-stx (current-orig-stx))])
;; If this isn't original syntax, then we can get some pretty bogus error messages. Note
;; that this is from a macro expansion, so that introduced vars and such don't confuse the user.
(if (eq? (syntax-source (current-orig-stx)) (syntax-source (orig-module-stx)))
(raise-typecheck-error (apply format msg rest) (list stx))
(raise-typecheck-error (apply format (string-append "Error in macro expansion -- " msg) rest) (list stx)))))
(cond
[(not (orig-module-stx))
(raise-typecheck-error (apply format msg rest) (list stx))]
[(eq? (syntax-source (current-orig-stx)) (syntax-source (orig-module-stx)))
(raise-typecheck-error (apply format msg rest) (list stx))]
[else (raise-typecheck-error (apply format (string-append "Error in macro expansion -- " msg) rest) (list stx))])))
;; produce a type error, given a particular syntax
(define (tc-error/stx stx msg . rest)