singular/plural instance, clarifying
I believe this resolves a singular/plural mismatch. In resolving it, I had to try and express which particular absent binding we are remarking on.
This commit is contained in:
parent
68c2d8afba
commit
dc5be5da86
|
@ -966,8 +966,8 @@ For a top-level definition (outside of a module), the order of
|
|||
evaluation affects the binding of a generated definition for a
|
||||
generated identifier use. If the use precedes the definition, then
|
||||
the use is resolved with the bindings that are in place at that
|
||||
point, which will not be a macro-generated binding.
|
||||
(No such dependency on order occurs
|
||||
point, which will not include the binding from the subsequently
|
||||
macro-generated definition. (No such dependency on order occurs
|
||||
within a module, since a module binding covers the entire module
|
||||
body.) To support the declaration of an identifier before its use,
|
||||
the @racket[define-syntaxes] form avoids binding an identifier if the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user