From e13f68f33297bf94e42addd4fc705c0d4fbe5509 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Hemann Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 10:36:39 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] 'body' v. 'body definition' of a begin-for-syntax As written the prose describes a 'body definition'; I can't find that phrase used elsewhere. I suspect it may be an artifact of an earlier rewrite. If correct as written, that term wants a definition or a pointer. --- pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/syntax-model.scrbl | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/syntax-model.scrbl b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/syntax-model.scrbl index 15b4dd2edc..f511dddf6f 100644 --- a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/syntax-model.scrbl +++ b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/syntax-model.scrbl @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ core syntactic forms are encountered: @tech{phase level} 1 (i.e., the @tech{transformer environment} is extended). More generally, @racket[begin-for-syntax] forms can be nested, and each @racket[begin-for-syntax] shifts its - body definition by one @tech{phase level}.} + body by one @tech{phase level}.} @item{When a @racket[let-values] form is encountered, the body of the @racket[let-values] form is extended (by creating new