From e6ffbf2501f33509eefb59b3b1ccaaf290f5b8a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Ojanen Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:58:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Improve reference to code value Did "temp7" used to print out as "???"? I would have understood this more quickly if the reference to "temp7" had been more clear. --- .../scribblings/guide/contracts/simple-function.scrbl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/guide/contracts/simple-function.scrbl b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/guide/contracts/simple-function.scrbl index 31fbca40bf..872a2ea6fc 100644 --- a/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/guide/contracts/simple-function.scrbl +++ b/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/guide/contracts/simple-function.scrbl @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ on a value other than an integer, then the server is to blame. @; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -@ctc-section[#:tag "flat-named-contracts"]{Contract Messages with ``???''} +@ctc-section[#:tag "flat-named-contracts"]{Contract Messages with ``tempN''} You wrote your module. You added contracts. You put them into the interface so that client programmers have all the information from interfaces. It's a @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ message: (require 'bank-server) (deposit -10)] -What is the @racketerror{???} doing there? Wouldn't it be nice if +What is the @racketerror{temp7} doing there? Wouldn't it be nice if we had a name for this class of data much like we have string, number, and so on?