doc: small adjustments to "eval-model.scrbl"
This commit is contained in:
parent
19d096dde7
commit
e745c047b0
|
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ Each evaluation step, then, transforms the current set of definitions and
|
|||
program into a new set of definitions and program. Before a
|
||||
@racket[define] can be moved into the set of definitions, its
|
||||
expression (i.e., its right-hand side) must be reduced to a @tech{value}.
|
||||
(The left-hand side is not evaluated.)
|
||||
(The left-hand side is not an expression position, and so it is not evaluated.)
|
||||
|
||||
@prog-steps/no-obj[
|
||||
[{}
|
||||
|
@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ changed, the value cannot be substituted for @racket[x] when
|
|||
the procedure is first applied.
|
||||
|
||||
@margin-note{We do not use the term ``parameter variable'' to refer to
|
||||
the parameter variable names declared with a function. This is to avoid
|
||||
confusion with Parameters (see @secref["parameter-model"]).}
|
||||
the argument variable names declared with a function. This choice avoids
|
||||
confusion with @tech{parameters}.}
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, a new @deftech{location} is created for each @tech{variable}
|
||||
on each application. The argument @tech{value} is placed in the
|
||||
|
@ -556,9 +556,11 @@ module-specific prefix).
|
|||
@;------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@subsection[#:tag "module-phase"]{Phases}
|
||||
|
||||
@guidealso["phases"]
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of @deftech{phases} is to
|
||||
address the necessary separation of names defined at execution time versus
|
||||
names defined at expansion time. See Section @secref["phases"] in the Guide.
|
||||
names defined at expansion time.
|
||||
|
||||
A module can be @tech{instantiate}d in multiple @tech{phases}. A
|
||||
phase is an integer that, like a module name, is effectively a prefix on the names
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user