Altering the box/c and box-immutable/c documentation.

This commit is contained in:
Stevie Strickland 2010-05-14 17:47:12 -04:00
parent e3678a937e
commit fce93a2d98

View File

@ -259,17 +259,30 @@ Like @racket[vector/c], but the individual contracts need not be
value, the result is not @racket[eq?] to the input.}
@defproc[(box/c [c (or/c flat-contract? (any/c . -> . any/c))]) flat-contract?]{
@defproc[(box/c [c contract?]
[#:immutable immutable (or/c #t #f 'dont-care) 'dont-care]
[#:flat? flat? boolean? #f])
contract?]{
Returns a contract that recognizes boxes. The content of the box must match @racket[c].
Returns a flat-contract that recognizes boxes. The content of the box
must match @racket[c].}
If the @racket[flat?] argument is @racket[#t], then the resulting contract is
a flat contract, and the @racket[c] argument must also be a flat contract. Such
flat contracts will be unsound if applied to mutable boxes, as they will not check
future operations on the box.
If the @racket[immutable] argument is @racket[#t] and the @racket[c] argument is
a flat contract, the result will be a flat contract. If the @racket[c] argument is
a chaperone contract, then the result will be a chaperone contract.
When a higher-order @racket[box/c] contract is applied to a box, the result
is not @racket[eq?] to the input. The result will be a copy for immutable boxes
and either a @tech{chaperone} or @tech{proxy} of the input for mutable boxes.}
@defproc[(box-immutable/c [c (or/c contract? (any/c . -> . any/c))]) contract?]{
@defproc[(box-immutable/c [c contract?]) contract?]{
Like @racket[box/c], but @racket[c] need not be @tech{flat
contract}. Beware that when this contract is applied to a value, the
result is not @racket[eq?] to the input.}
Returns the same contract as @racket[(box/c c #:immutable #t)]. This exists for
reasons of backwards compatibility, and may be removed in the future.}
@defproc[(listof [c (or/c contract? (any/c . -> . any/c))]) contract?]{