The dance that syntax/parse performs to lazily load its implementation
rewrites uses of syntax/parse macros in such a way that their original
names were discarded, which shows up in error messages. By simply
invoking the underlying transformer directly in the proxy macro instead
of expanding to a rewritten use, users’ names can be preserved.
fixes#1909
Don't report ltps success for file descriptors that are not supported
by epoll.
Racket ports probably were not affected, since Racket doesn't try ltps
registration for regular files or devices like /dev/null that report
always being ready.
Provide unsafe functions for working with file descriptors and
sockets. Although more functions are potentially useful, these
reflect the one scurrently exported by the C API.
When a composable continuation has continuation marks that should
be merged with marks in the immediate continuation frame when
the continuation is applied, then mergeing did not always work.
It only worked in the case that the merge cadidates are the only
marks, because the merging check used the wrong end of the captured
sequence of marks.
Note: this version doesn't work with ~commit or ~!, because
it stores both choice points and undo actions in the failure
continuation. Commit and cut should discard choice points but
preserve undo actions.
This reverts commit 52e7267273.
The change was for `will-try-execute`. And while the change
is a good idea, `will-try-execute` doesn't acually accept
the extra argument.
Repairs another regression due to the rktio conversion, where a
connection that takes a while can be mismanaged, especially if
multiple connection attempts run concurrently.
Using `(local-expand <expr> 'module-begin <stops> def-ctx)` didn't
work right, because definitions added to `def-ctx` were not visible.
(While adding definitions before `module-begin` expansion is an unusual
thing to do, there's no reason that it has to fail.)
Repairs a problem with ce9894c8bf, where a large "inlined" vector
allocation is not actually inlined, but other parts of the JIT
assume that it will behave as inlined --- which implies that the
runstack will be left unchanged after the call.
Closes#1868
