This test started failing due to the additions of the calls
to clip, introduced in commit e6dc9c28b4. The actual
difference is only 9 pixels out of about 100,000 relevant
pixels. Even better, here's the precise rgb values for the
mis-matched pixels (the alpha values don't change):
(224 251 255) vs (229 255 255)
(200 242 255) vs (205 247 255)
(205 242 255) vs (210 247 255)
(205 242 255) vs (210 247 255)
(205 242 255) vs (210 247 255)
(205 242 255) vs (210 247 255)
(200 242 255) vs (205 247 255)
(224 251 255) vs (229 255 255)
(242 255 255) vs (247 255 255)
It isn't clear to me why clipping like this would have this
particular change, but I think it is safe to assume that
Redex shouldn't change in response to this!
The revised implementation is more clearly and directly expressed
in terms of table cells that span columns.
Also, avoid `panorama' by removing a useless `inset' that seems
likely to be the reason for the `panorama'.
Unix bitmaps to go with the new tests are missing; Robby plans to
add them.
