Add `file-position*', which can return #f instead of raising
an exception when a port's position is unknown. Change
`make-input-port' and `make-output-port' to accept more
kinds of values as the initial position.
These changes make it possible to synchronize a port's
position with a `port-commit-peeked' action. It's ugly,
which I think reflect something broken about position
tracking in the port protocol (which seems difficult to fix
without breaking compaibility).
Providing a port instead of a reading or writing procedure
redirects the read/write to the specified port. This shortcut
is kind of a hack, but the run-time system can easily streamline
the redirection when it's exposed this way.
Using the new redirection feature reduces overhead in
`with-output-to-bytes' and `pretty-print'.
We can't disallow the creation of bad mutators without breaking
old code, but we can prevent the JIT from treating them like
good ones.
Closes PR 13062
Stream generic operations stopped working for lists
since the operations used only the generic dispatcher
instead of the real generic functions.
(Moral of this story: write more tests)
that it drops from the expansion (like define/public) by
adding them to the origin syntax property (and sometimes
to disappeared-use; see the add-decl-props function
for details on those that aren't in the origin property)
this means that check syntax will now pick them up
so they'll show up in the blue boxes in drracket
Thanks Matthew, for some helpful advice and
comments on an initial version of the commit.
Generalize splitting of `(let-values ([(x ...) (values e ...)]) ....)'
to `(let ([x e] ...) ....)' for any `e', since it's always equivalent.
Right?
(The old requirements on the `e's seem to be needed only for
`letrec-values' splitting and maybe mutable variables.)
Treat unsafe functional operations (which never raise an
exception) as omitable, which means that simple `let-values'
combinations can be split into `let' bindings, etc.
Basically, Racklog (and all versions of schelog) implement ! by
causing the failure continuation of the entire relation being
returned. They did not also cause the unification caused by the
relation to be un-done.
However, it is not easy to separate un-doing the local changes because
the unification just returns a failure continuation too. I had to call
that fail continuation but use state to communicate to its target that
the next clause should not be visited.
I don't know if this is correct. My test suite contains a lot of cut
tests that still pass. Erik's test passes too. But I'm not confident
that this really works.
Internally, there's a `prop:method-arity-error' property that is
used for keyword-accepting methods. The same thing could be
accomplished with `procedure->method', but the new property avoids
a wrapper. It might be nice to expose the property from `racket/base',
but that creates trouble for generating arity errors for keyword-
requiring procedures (i.e., when such a procedure is wrapped), so
keep it provate for now.
Closes PR 12982
Split out base-abbrev.rkt so that subtype is not dependent on abbrev.rkt.
Remove unused code in numeric-tower.rkt so that it is now a dependent of
abbrev.rkt, which allows the body of convenience.rkt to be merged back in.
Remove special casing for union.rkt and extraneous subtyping checks.
Remove union-maker.
conventions in 9.2.1 of the reference (altho the messages do
not yet do the extra level of indenting when a field is too
long, nor are there any field names ending in ...)
Also, fix the docs for the #:stronger argument to
make-contract, make-chaperone-contract, and make-flat-contract
Specifically, it seems like about 20% of the time (in drdr),
running the program
(let l()(l))
in DrRacket and then clicking the break button results in a state
where DrRacket's focus is not in the definitions window. I can't seem
to make this happen on my own machine and I'm not sure if this a
race-condition in the test suite or a real bug in DrRacket but it
seems minor enough (given all of the other focus-based testing that is
happening in this (and related) test suites) that I'm just going to
give up on this particular test.
A progress evt from a close input port must be initially ready,
and the primitive `peek-bytes-avail!' checks a progress evt
before checking whether the port is closed.
These changes resolve a race in `read-bytes-evt' and related evt
constructors.
This is a follow-up to commit ec6f3fd610. We're still
seeing crashes while rendering the "plot" documentation, and this
change seems to make things work on my machine.
