Changes:
- Allow unit contracts to import and export the same signature.
- Add "invoke" contracts that will wrap the result of invoking a unit contract,
no wrapping occurs when a body contract is not specified
- Improve error messages
- Support for init-depend clauses in unit contracts.
- Fix documentation to refelct the above
- Overhaul of unit related tests
Handling init-depend clauses in unit contracts is a rather large and somewhat
non-backwards-compatible change to unit contracts. Unit contracts must now
specify at least as many initialization dependencies as the unit value being
contracted, but may include more. These new dependencies are now actually
specified in the unit wrapper so that they will be checked by compound-unit
expressions.
This commit also adds more information to the first-order-check
error messages. If a unit imports tagged signatures, previously the errror
message did not specify which tag was missing from the unit contract. Now
the tag is printed along with the signature name.
Documentation has been edited to reflect the changes to unit/c contracts
made by this commit.
Additionally this commit overhauls all tests for units and unit contracts.
Test cases now actually check that expected error messages are triggered when
checking contract, syntax, and runtime errors. Test forms now expand into uses
of rackunit's check-exn form so only test failures are reported and all tests in
a file are run on every run of the test file.
Progress toward making the bytecode compiler deterministic, so that a
fresh `make base` always produces exactly the same bytecode from the
same sources. Most changes involve avoiding hash-table order
dependencies and adjusting scope identity. The namespace used to load
a reader extension is also better defined. Plus many other little
changes.
The identity of a scope that is unmarshaled from a bytecode file now
incorporates the hash of the file, and the relative order of scopes is
preserved in a bytecode file. This combination allows compilation to
start with modules that loaded and compiled in different orders
(including delayed loading of bytecode fragments within one file).
Formerly, a reader extension triggered by `#lang` or `#reader` was
loaded in whatever namespace happens to be current. That's
unpredictable and can pollute a module build at the level of bytecode.
To help make builds deterministic, reader extensions are now loaded in
a root namespace of the current namespace.
Deterministic compilation in general relies on deterministic macros.
The two most common ways for a macro to be non-deterministic are by
using `gensym` (use `generate-temporaries`, instead) and by using an
unsorted hash-table traversal (don't do that).
At this point, bytecode generation is unlikely to be completely
deterministic, since I uncovered non-determinism mostly by iterating
attempts over the base collections. For now, the intent is not to
provide guarantees outside of the compilation of the base collections
--- but "more deterministic" is likely to be useful in the short run,
and we can improve further in the long run.
Nested splicing forms would lead to an "ambigious binding" error
when the nested forms bind the same name, such as in
(splicing-let ([a 1])
(splicing-let ([a 2])
(define x a)))
The problem is that splicing is implemented by adding a scope to
everything in the form's body, but removing it back off the
identifiers of a definition (so the `x` above ends up with no new
scopes). Meanwhile, a splicing form expands to a set of definitions,
where the locally bound identifier keeps the extra scope (unlike
definitions from the body). A local identifier for a nested splicing
form would then keep the inner scope but lose the outer scope, while
a local identifier from the outer splicing form would keep the outer
scope but no have the inner one --- leading to ambiguity.
The solution in this commit is to annotate a local identifier for a
splicing form with a property that says "intended to be local", so the
nested definition will keep the scope for the outer splicing form as
well as the inner one. It's not clear that this is the right approach,
but it's the best idea I have for now.
1st is a small grammatical mistake
2nd is in a section about ->* yet mistakenly -> is referred to
3rd is about recontract-out yet contract-out is mentioned instead
4th clarifies return value for value-contract
5th replaces free-identifier? with free-identifier=?
Genereating a use-site scope, instead of a macro-introduction scope,
prevents the scope's presense from triggering a #f result from
`syntax-original?`.
- Coalesce repeated use of the same predicate.
- Fix scoring of Exact patterns, and scoring generally.
- Use `OrderedAnd` where needed.
- Guarantee that `and` patterns match in order.
- Thread bound variable information properly in GSeq compilation.
- Warn when variables are used non-linearly with `...`
(making this behave properly was not backwards compatible).
Closes#952, which now runs in <1ms and make it a test case.
Also add margin note about `?` patterns and multiple calls.
