Cairo doesn't seem to deal correctly with an HDC produced
by BeginPaint() that has a clipping region. The problem affects
only Win64. Work around the problem by drawing to a separate
HDC and copying to/from the screen. (To see the problem before
this patch, draw the DrRacket window to the edge of the screen
and back, and observe tha the toolbar doesn't update correctly.)
This change could affect performance, but it should mostly
be limited to refresh when a window moves.
Split out base-abbrev.rkt so that subtype is not dependent on abbrev.rkt.
Remove unused code in numeric-tower.rkt so that it is now a dependent of
abbrev.rkt, which allows the body of convenience.rkt to be merged back in.
Remove special casing for union.rkt and extraneous subtyping checks.
Remove union-maker.
conventions in 9.2.1 of the reference (altho the messages do
not yet do the extra level of indenting when a field is too
long, nor are there any field names ending in ...)
Also, fix the docs for the #:stronger argument to
make-contract, make-chaperone-contract, and make-flat-contract
Specifically, it seems like about 20% of the time (in drdr),
running the program
(let l()(l))
in DrRacket and then clicking the break button results in a state
where DrRacket's focus is not in the definitions window. I can't seem
to make this happen on my own machine and I'm not sure if this a
race-condition in the test suite or a real bug in DrRacket but it
seems minor enough (given all of the other focus-based testing that is
happening in this (and related) test suites) that I'm just going to
give up on this particular test.
A progress evt from a close input port must be initially ready,
and the primitive `peek-bytes-avail!' checks a progress evt
before checking whether the port is closed.
These changes resolve a race in `read-bytes-evt' and related evt
constructors.
Commit 18883681a2 reordered the methods. Although the convention in
the `racket/draw' manual is to order methods alphabetically,
alphabetical does look strange for `color%', and I've refined the
non-alphabetical order to one I like even more.
