#lang scribble/doc @(require scribble/manual scribble/eval racket/class "guide-utils.rkt") @title[#:tag "reflection" #:style 'toc]{Reflection and Dynamic Evaluation} Racket is a @italic{dynamic} language. It offers numerous facilities for loading, compiling, and even constructing new code at run time. @local-table-of-contents[] @; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- @section[#:tag "eval"]{@racket[eval]} @margin-note{This example will not work within a module or in DrRacket's definitions window, but it will work in the interactions window, for reasons that are explained by the end of @secref["namespaces"].} The @racket[eval] function takes a representation of an expression or definition (as a ``quoted'' form or @tech{syntax object}) and evaluates it: @interaction[ (eval '(+ 1 2)) ] The power of @racket[eval] is that an expression can be constructed dynamically: @interaction[ (define (eval-formula formula) (eval `(let ([x 2] [y 3]) ,formula))) (eval-formula '(+ x y)) (eval-formula '(+ (* x y) y)) ] Of course, if we just wanted to evaluate expressions with given values for @racket[x] and @racket[y], we do not need @racket[eval]. A more direct approach is to use first-class functions: @interaction[ (define (apply-formula formula-proc) (formula-proc 2 3)) (apply-formula (lambda (x y) (+ x y))) (apply-formula (lambda (x y) (+ (* x y) y))) ] However, if expressions like @racket[(+ x y)] and @racket[(+ (* x y) y)] are read from a file supplied by a user, for example, then @racket[eval] might be appropriate. Similarly, the @tech{REPL} reads expressions that are typed by a user and uses @racket[eval] to evaluate them. Also, @racket[eval] is often used directly or indirectly on whole modules. For example, a program might load a module on demand using @racket[dynamic-require], which is essentially a wrapper around @racket[eval] to dynamically load the module code. @; ---------------------------------------- @subsection{Local Scopes} The @racket[eval] function cannot see local bindings in the context where it is called. For example, calling @racket[eval] inside an unquoted @racket[let] form to evaluate a formula does not make values visible for @racket[x] and @racket[y]: @interaction[ (define (broken-eval-formula formula) (let ([x 2] [y 3]) (eval formula))) (broken-eval-formula '(+ x y)) ] The @racket[eval] function cannot see the @racket[x] and @racket[y] bindings precisely because it is a function, and Racket is a lexically scoped language. Imagine if @racket[eval] were implemented as @racketblock[ (define (eval x) (eval-expanded (macro-expand x))) ] then at the point when @racket[eval-expanded] is called, the most recent binding of @racket[x] is to the expression to evaluate, not the @racket[let] binding in @racket[broken-eval-formula]. Lexical scope prevents such confusing and fragile behavior, and consequently prevents @racket[eval] from seeing local bindings in the context where it is called. You might imagine that even though @racket[eval] cannot see the local bindings in @racket[broken-eval-formula], there must actually be a data structure mapping @racket[x] to @racket[2] and @racket[y] to @racket[3], and you would like a way to get that data structure. In fact, no such data structure exists; the compiler is free to replace every use of @racket[x] with @racket[2] at compile time, so that the local binding of @racket[x] does not exist in any concrete sense at run-time. Even when variables cannot be eliminated by constant-folding, normally the names of the variables can be eliminated, and the data structures that hold local values do not resemble a mapping from names to values. @; ---------------------------------------- @subsection[#:tag "namespaces"]{Namespaces} Since @racket[eval] cannot see the bindings from the context where it is called, another mechanism is needed to determine dynamically available bindings. A @deftech{namespace} is a first-class value that encapsulates the bindings available for dynamic evaluation. @margin-note{Informally, the term @defterm{namespace} is sometimes used interchangeably with @defterm{environment} or @defterm{scope}. In Racket, the term @defterm{namespace} has the more specific, dynamic meaning given above, and it should not be confused with static lexical concepts.} Some functions, such as @racket[eval], accept an optional namespace argument. More often, the namespace used by a dynamic operation is the @deftech{current namespace} as determined by the @racket[current-namespace] @tech{parameter}. When @racket[eval] is used in a @tech{REPL}, the current namespace is the one that the @tech{REPL} uses for evaluating expressions. That's why the following interaction successfully accesses @racket[x] via @racket[eval]: @interaction[ (define x 3) (eval 'x) ] In contrast, try the following a simple module and running in directly in DrRacket or supplying the file as a command-line argument to @exec{racket}: @racketmod[ racket (eval '(cons 1 2)) ] This fails because the initial current namespace is empty. When you run @exec{racket} in interactive mode (see @secref["start-interactive-mode"]), the initial namespace is initialized with the exports of the @racket[racket] module, but when you run a module directly, the initial namespace starts empty. In general, it's a bad idea to use @racket[eval] with whatever namespace happens to be installed. Instead, create a namespace explicitly and install it for the call to eval: @racketmod[ racket (define ns (make-base-namespace)) (eval '(cons 1 2) ns) (code:comment @#,t{works}) ] The @racket[make-base-namespace] function creates a namespace that is initialized with the exports of @racket[racket/base]. The later section @secref["mk-namespace"] provides more information on creating and configuring namespaces. @; ---------------------------------------- @subsection{Namespaces and Modules} As with @racket[let] bindings, lexical scope means that @racket[eval] cannot automatically see the definitions of a @racket[module] in which it is called. Unlike @racket[let] bindings, however, Racket provides a way to reflect a module into a @tech{namespace}. The @racket[module->namespace] function takes a quoted @tech{module path} and produces a namespace for evaluating expressions and definitions as if they appeared in the @racket[module] body: @interaction[ (module m racket/base (define x 11)) (require 'm) (define ns (module->namespace ''m)) (eval 'x ns) ] @margin-note{The double quoting in @racket[''m] is because @racket['m] is a module path that refers to an interactively declared module, and so @racket[''m] is the quoted form of the path.} The @racket[module->namespace] function is mostly useful from outside a module, where the module's full name is known. Inside a @racket[module] form, however, the full name of a module may not be known, because it may depend on where the module source is location when it is eventually loaded. From within a @racket[module], use @racket[define-namespace-anchor] to declare a reflection hook on the module, and use @racket[namespace-anchor->namespace] to reel in the module's namespace: @racketmod[ racket (define-namespace-anchor a) (define ns (namespace-anchor->namespace a)) (define x 1) (define y 2) (eval '(cons x y) ns) (code:comment @#,t{produces @racketresult[(1 . 2)]}) ] @; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- @section[#:tag "mk-namespace"]{Manipulating Namespaces} A @tech{namespace} encapsulates two pieces of information: @itemize[ @item{A mapping from identifiers to bindings. For example, a namespace might map the identifier @racketidfont{lambda} to the @racket[lambda] form. An ``empty'' namespace is one that maps every identifier to an uninitialized top-level variable.} @item{A mapping from module names to module declarations and instances.} ] The first mapping is used for evaluating expressions in a top-level context, as in @racket[(eval '(lambda (x) (+ x 1)))]. The second mapping is used, for example, by @racket[dynamic-require] to locate a module. The call @racket[(eval '(require racket/base))] normally uses both pieces: the identifier mapping determines the binding of @racketidfont{require}; if it turns out to mean @racket[require], then the module mapping is used to locate the @racketmodname[racket/base] module. From the perspective of the core Racket run-time system, all evaluation is reflective. Execution starts with an initial namespace that contains a few primitive modules, and that is further populated by loading files and modules as specified on the command line or as supplied in the @tech{REPL}. Top-level @racket[require] and @racket[define] forms adjusts the identifier mapping, and module declarations (typically loaded on demand for a @racket[require] form) adjust the module mapping. @; ---------------------------------------- @subsection{Creating and Installing Namespaces} The function @racket[make-empty-namespace] creates a new, empty @tech{namespace}. Since the namespace is truly empty, it cannot at first be used to evaluate any top-level expression---not even @racket[(require racket)]. In particular, @racketblock[ (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-empty-namespace)]) (namespace-require 'racket)) ] fails, because the namespace does not include the primitive modules on which @racket[racket] is built. To make a namespace useful, some modules must be @deftech{attached} from an existing namespace. Attaching a module adjusts the mapping of module names to instances by transitively copying entries (the module and all its imports) from an existing namespace's mapping. Normally, instead of just attaching the primitive modules---whose names and organization are subject to change---a higher-level module is attached, such as @racketmodname[racket] or @racketmodname[racket/base]. The @racket[make-base-empty-namespace] function provides a namespace that is empty, except that @racketmodname[racket/base] is attached. The resulting namespace is still ``empty'' in the sense that the identifiers-to-bindings part of the namespace has no mappings; only the module mapping has been populated. Nevertheless, with an initial module mapping, further modules can be loaded. A namespace created with @racket[make-base-empty-namespace] is suitable for many basic dynamic tasks. For example, suppose that a @racketmodfont{my-dsl} library implements a domain-specific language in which you want to execute commands from a user-specified file. A namespace created with @racket[make-base-empty-namespace] is enough to get started: @racketblock[ (define (run-dsl file) (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-base-empty-namespace)]) (namespace-require 'my-dsl) (load file))) ] Note that the @racket[parameterize] of @racket[current-namespace] does not affect the meaning of identifiers like @racket[namespace-require] within the @racket[parameterize] body. Those identifiers obtain their meaning from the enclosing context (probably a module). Only expressions that are dynamic with respect to this code, such as the content of @racket[load]ed files, are affected by the @racket[parameterize]. Another subtle point in the above example is the use of @racket[(namespace-require 'my-dsl)] instead of @racket[(eval '(require my-dsl))]. The latter would not work, because @racket[eval] needs to obtain a meaning for @racket[require] in the namespace, and the namespace's identifier mapping is initially empty. The @racket[namespace-require] function, in contrast, directly imports the given module into the current namespace. Starting with @racket[(namespace-require 'racket/base)] would introduce a binding for @racketidfont{require} and make a subsequent @racket[(eval '(require my-dsl))] work. The above is better, not only because it is more compact, but also because it avoids introducing bindings that are not part of the domain-specific languages. @; ---------------------------------------- @subsection{Sharing Data and Code Across Namespaces} Modules not attached to a new namespace will be loaded and instantiated afresh if they are demanded by evaluation. For example, @racketmodname[racket/base] does not include @racketmodname[racket/class], and loading @racketmodname[racket/class] again will create a distinct class datatype: @interaction[ (require racket/class) (class? object%) (class? (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-base-empty-namespace)]) (namespace-require 'racket/class) (code:comment @#,t{loads again}) (eval 'object%))) ] For cases when dynamically loaded code needs to share more code and data with its context, use the @racket[namespace-attach-module] function. The first argument to @racket[namespace-attach-module] is a source namespace from which to draw a module instance; in some cases, the current namespace is known to include the module that needs to be shared: @interaction[ (require racket/class) (class? (let ([ns (make-base-empty-namespace)]) (namespace-attach-module (current-namespace) 'racket/class ns) (parameterize ([current-namespace ns]) (namespace-require 'racket/class) (code:comment @#,t{uses attached}) (eval 'object%)))) ] Within a module, however, the combination of @racket[define-namespace-anchor] and @racket[namespace-anchor->empty-namespace] offers a more reliable method for obtaining a source namespace: @racketmod[ racket/base (require racket/class) (define-namespace-anchor a) (define (load-plug-in file) (let ([ns (make-base-empty-namespace)]) (namespace-attach-module (namespace-anchor->empty-namespace a) 'racket/class ns) (parameterize ([current-namespace ns]) (dynamic-require file 'plug-in%)))) ] The anchor bound by @racket[namespace-attach-module] connects the run time of a module with the namespace in which a module is loaded (which might differ from the current namespace). In the above example, since the enclosing module requires @racketmodname[racket/class], the namespace produced by @racket[namespace-anchor->empty-namespace] certainly contains an instance of @racketmodname[racket/class]. Moreover, that instance is the same as the one imported into the module, so the class datatype is shared. @; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- @section[#:tag "load"]{Scripting Evaluation and Using @racket[load]} Historically, Lisp implementations did not offer module systems. Instead, large programs were built by essentially scripting the @tech{REPL} to evaluate program fragments in a particular order. While @tech{REPL} scripting turns out to be a bad way to structure programs and libraries, it is still sometimes a useful capability. @margin-note{Describing a program via @racket[load] interacts especially badly with macro-defined language extensions @cite["Flatt02"].} The @racket[load] function runs a @tech{REPL} script by @racket[read]ing S-expressions from a file, one by one, and passing them to @racket[eval]. If a file @filepath{place.rkts} contains @racketblock[ (define city "Salt Lake City") (define state "Utah") (printf "~a, ~a\n" city state) ] then it can be loaded in a @tech{REPL}: @interaction[ (eval:alts (load "place.rkts") (begin (define city "Salt Lake City") (printf "~a, Utah\n" city))) city ] Since @racket[load] uses @racket[eval], however, a module like the following generally will not work---for the same reasons described in @secref["namespaces"]: @racketmod[ racket (define there "Utopia") (load "here.rkts") ] The current namespace for evaluating the content of @filepath{here.rkts} is likely to be empty; in any case, you cannot get @racket[there] from @filepath{here.rkts}. Also, any definitions in @filepath{here.rkts} will not become visible for use within the module; after all, the @racket[load] happens dynamically, while references to identifiers within the module are resolved lexically, and therefore statically. Unlike @racket[eval], @racket[load] does not accept a namespace argument. To supply a namespace to @racket[load], set the @racket[current-namespace] @tech{parameter}. The following example evaluates the expressions in @filepath{here.rkts} using the bindings of the @racketmodname[racket/base] module: @racketmod[ racket (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-base-namespace)]) (load "here.rkts")) ] You can even use @racket[namespace-anchor->namespace] to make the bindings of the enclosing module accessible for dynamic evaluation. In the following example, when @filepath{here.rkts} is @racket[load]ed, it can refer to @racket[there] as well as the bindings of @racketmodname[racket]: @racketmod[ racket (define there "Utopia") (define-namespace-anchor a) (parameterize ([current-namespace (namespace-anchor->namespace a)]) (load "here.rkts")) ] Still, if @filepath{here.rkts} defines any identifiers, the definitions cannot be directly (i.e., statically) referenced by in the enclosing module. The @racketmodname[racket/load] module language is different from @racketmodname[racket] or @racketmodname[racket/base]. A module using @racketmodname[racket/load] treats all of its content as dynamic, passing each form in the module body to @racket[eval] (using a namespace that is initialized with @racketmodname[racket]). As a result, uses of @racket[eval] and @racket[load] in the module body see the same dynamic namespace as immediate body forms. For example, if @filepath{here.rkts} contains @racketblock[ (define here "Morporkia") (define (go!) (set! here there)) ] then running @racketmod[ racket/load (define there "Utopia") (load "here.rkts") (go!) (printf "~a\n" here) ] prints ``Utopia''. Drawbacks of using @racketmodname[racket/load] include reduced error checking, tool support, and performance. For example, with the program @racketmod[ racket/load (define good 5) (printf "running\n") good bad ] DrRacket's @onscreen{Check Syntax} tool cannot tell that the second @racket[good] is a reference to the first, and the unbound reference to @racket[bad] is reported only at run time instead of rejected syntactically.