| .. |
|
all-rackunit-tests.rkt
|
A few more stray "racunit"s.
|
2010-05-26 15:21:55 -04:00 |
|
base-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
check-info-test.rkt
|
Correcting test
|
2010-06-02 12:12:44 -06:00 |
|
check-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
counter-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
format-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
hash-monad-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
location-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
monad-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
pr10950.rkt
|
This test relied on the old source location losing behavior of Rackunit
|
2010-11-25 11:38:43 -05:00 |
|
result-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
run-tests.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
standalone-check-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
standalone-test-case-test.rkt
|
The stacks appear to be different, so maybe the JIT is different on Linux and disabling it will get stable output?
|
2010-11-02 15:44:35 -06:00 |
|
standalone.rkt
|
The stacks appear to be different, so maybe the JIT is different on Linux and disabling it will get stable output?
|
2010-11-02 15:44:35 -06:00 |
|
test-case-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
test-suite-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
test-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
text-ui-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
text-ui-util-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
|
tl.rkt
|
updated the docs to reflect that the various checks return void. Also added in some tests to that effect.
|
2010-08-27 11:27:29 -05:00 |
|
util-test.rkt
|
"Racunit" -> "Rackunit"
|
2010-05-17 12:07:32 -04:00 |
