The issue is what happens when the actual function has other arities.
For example, if the function were (λ (x [y 1]) y) then it is not okay
to simply check if procedure-arity-includes? of 1 is true (what the
code used to do) because then when the function is applied to 2
arguments, the call won't fail like it should. It is possible to check
and reject functions that don't have exactly the right arity, but if
the contract were (-> string? any), then the function would have been
allowed and only when the extra argument is supplied would the error
occur. So, this commit makes it so that (-> any/c any) is like
(-> string? any), but with the optimization that if the procedure
accepts only one argument, then no wrapper is created.
This is a backwards incompatible change because it used to be the
case that (flat-contract? (-> any)) returned #t and it now returns #f.
36b3493e45