Matthew Flatt 51bf69e356 switch for/list back to a loop plus reverse ... Closes #1721, which points out that the `for/list` expansion introduced in commit 5e94a906cd interacts badly with a body that captures a continuation plus Racket's current implemenation of continuations. When Racket one day gets a better implementation of continuations, this change could be considered again, but the general question is whether programs can detect or be affected by the size of the continuation (when the programs don't directly control the continuation creation --- otherwise continuation marks obviously expose the size).		2017-06-20 08:28:53 -06:00
..
mzlib	Finish fixing dependencies of "racket-test-core".	2014-12-19 11:35:39 -05:00
tests/racket	switch for/list back to a loop plus reverse	2017-06-20 08:28:53 -06:00
info.rkt	Remove stray unstable dependency.	2015-09-14 16:54:06 -05:00
LICENSE.txt	update copyright year to 2017	2017-01-02 06:42:31 -07:00