racket/collects/tests/eopl/chapter5/exceptions/interp.rkt
David Van Horn 7491e172ea EOPL test suite re-written in Racket-based #lang eopl and rackunit
The eopl language is now racket-based rather than mzscheme-based.  This
test-suite, which was originally distributed on the book's web-site has
been re-written in the new language.  Changes include dropping all
drscheme-init.scm and top.scm files.  Remaining files were renamed to
use the .rkt extension and edited to use the #lang syntax (instead of
modulue).  Require and provide forms were changed to reflect racket's
syntax instead of mzscheme's (eg, only-in vs. only).  Several
occurrences of one-armed ifs were changed to use when and unless.  All
tests have been run successfully.
2012-02-24 14:46:18 -05:00

208 lines
6.5 KiB
Racket
Executable File

#lang eopl
(require "lang.rkt")
(require "data-structures.rkt")
(require "environments.rkt")
(provide value-of-program value-of/k)
(provide trace-apply-procedure)
(define trace-apply-procedure (make-parameter #f))
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; continuations ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(define-datatype continuation continuation?
(end-cont) ; []
(diff1-cont ; cont[(- [] (value-of e2 env))]
(exp2 expression?)
(env environment?)
(cont continuation?))
(diff2-cont ; cont[(- val1 [])]
(val1 expval?)
(cont continuation?))
(unop-arg-cont
(unop unary-op?)
(cont continuation?))
(if-test-cont
(exp2 expression?)
(exp3 expression?)
(env environment?)
(cont continuation?))
(rator-cont ; cont[(apply-proc [] (value-of rand env))]
(rand expression?)
(env environment?)
(cont continuation?))
(rand-cont ; cont[(apply-proc val1 [])]
(val1 expval?)
(cont continuation?))
(try-cont
(var symbol?)
(handler-exp expression?)
(env environment?)
(cont continuation?))
(raise1-cont
(saved-cont continuation?))
)
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; the interpreter ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;; value-of-program : Program -> ExpVal
(define value-of-program
(lambda (pgm)
(cases program pgm
(a-program (body)
(value-of/k body (init-env) (end-cont))))))
;; value-of/k : Exp * Env * Cont -> FinalAnswer
;; Page: 173
(define value-of/k
(lambda (exp env cont)
(cases expression exp
(const-exp (num) (apply-cont cont (num-val num)))
(const-list-exp (nums)
(apply-cont cont
(list-val (map num-val nums))))
(var-exp (var) (apply-cont cont (apply-env env var)))
(diff-exp (exp1 exp2)
(value-of/k exp1 env
(diff1-cont exp2 env cont)))
(unop-exp (unop exp1)
(value-of/k exp1 env
(unop-arg-cont unop cont)))
(if-exp (exp1 exp2 exp3)
(value-of/k exp1 env
(if-test-cont exp2 exp3 env cont)))
(proc-exp (var body)
(apply-cont cont
(proc-val
(procedure var body env))))
(call-exp (rator rand)
(value-of/k rator env
(rator-cont rand env cont)))
;; make let a macro, because I'm too lazy to add the extra
;; continuation
(let-exp (var exp1 body)
(value-of/k
(call-exp (proc-exp var body) exp1)
env
cont))
(letrec-exp (p-name b-var p-body letrec-body)
(value-of/k
letrec-body
(extend-env-rec p-name b-var p-body env)
cont))
(try-exp (exp1 var handler-exp)
(value-of/k exp1 env
(try-cont var handler-exp env cont)))
(raise-exp (exp1)
(value-of/k exp1 env
(raise1-cont cont))))))
;; apply-cont : continuation * expval -> final-expval
(define apply-cont
(lambda (cont val)
(cases continuation cont
(end-cont () val)
(diff1-cont (exp2 saved-env saved-cont)
(value-of/k exp2 saved-env (diff2-cont val saved-cont)))
(diff2-cont (val1 saved-cont)
(let ((n1 (expval->num val1))
(n2 (expval->num val)))
(apply-cont saved-cont
(num-val (- n1 n2)))))
(unop-arg-cont (unop cont)
(apply-cont cont
(apply-unop unop val)))
(if-test-cont (exp2 exp3 env cont)
(if (expval->bool val)
(value-of/k exp2 env cont)
(value-of/k exp3 env cont)))
(rator-cont (rand saved-env saved-cont)
(value-of/k rand saved-env
(rand-cont val saved-cont)))
(rand-cont (val1 saved-cont)
(let ((proc (expval->proc val1)))
(apply-procedure proc val saved-cont)))
;; the body of the try finished normally-- don't evaluate the handler
(try-cont (var handler-exp saved-env saved-cont)
(apply-cont saved-cont val))
;; val is the value of the argument to raise
(raise1-cont (saved-cont)
;; we put the short argument first to make the trace more readable.
(apply-handler val saved-cont))
)))
;; apply-handler : ExpVal * Cont -> FinalAnswer
(define apply-handler
(lambda (val cont)
(cases continuation cont
;; interesting cases
(try-cont (var handler-exp saved-env saved-cont)
(value-of/k handler-exp
(extend-env var val saved-env)
saved-cont))
(end-cont () (eopl:error 'apply-handler "uncaught exception!"))
;; otherwise, just look for the handler...
(diff1-cont (exp2 saved-env saved-cont)
(apply-handler val saved-cont))
(diff2-cont (val1 saved-cont)
(apply-handler val saved-cont))
(if-test-cont (exp2 exp3 env saved-cont)
(apply-handler val saved-cont))
(unop-arg-cont (unop saved-cont)
(apply-handler val saved-cont))
(rator-cont (rand saved-env saved-cont)
(apply-handler val saved-cont))
(rand-cont (val1 saved-cont)
(apply-handler val saved-cont))
(raise1-cont (cont)
(apply-handler val cont))
)))
;; apply-procedure : procedure * expval * cont -> final-expval
(define apply-procedure
(lambda (proc1 arg cont)
(cases proc proc1
(procedure (var body saved-env)
(value-of/k body
(extend-env var arg saved-env)
cont)))))
(define apply-unop
(lambda (unop val)
(cases unary-op unop
(null?-unop ()
(bool-val
(null? (expval->list val))))
(car-unop ()
(car (expval->list val)))
(cdr-unop ()
(list-val (cdr (expval->list val))))
(zero?-unop ()
(bool-val
(zero? (expval->num val)))))))
;; to get the detailed trace:
;; (trace value-of/k apply-cont apply-handler)