![]() If the selector is itself a chaperone, then doing the access once will mean that the saved result is not `chaperone-of?` the result of doing the access a second time, at least in some cases (such as when the accessor uses vector contracts). Thanks to Neil T for initial spotting, and to Robby for actually finding the bug and suggesting the fix. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
collects | ||
src | ||
.gitignore |