suzanne.soy/remix
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update deps

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jay McCarthy 2014-07-07 11:55:55 -04:00
parent 16317b0aa7
commit 456f4aa721
2 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
info.rkt
View File

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
#lang info #lang info
(define version "0.0") (define version "0.0")
(define collection 'multi) (define collection 'multi)
(define deps '())
(define build-deps '())

8
scribblings/racket2/racket2.scrbl
View File

@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ build on existing macro technology. Now that we have discovered Honu,
we must push it to develop a new kind of extensible compiler we must push it to develop a new kind of extensible compiler
front-end. front-end.
XXX identifier freedom with forced whitespace
@emph{Why @"@"?} R1 has taught us the importance of embedding prose in @emph{Why @"@"?} R1 has taught us the importance of embedding prose in
programs. By including the @"@"-reader at all times, we make it easier programs. By including the @"@"-reader at all times, we make it easier
to embed prose. to embed prose.
@ -181,6 +183,8 @@ default, but the context of the application changes it to be provided
by a version of the list modules that optimizes @racket[snoc] and by a version of the list modules that optimizes @racket[snoc] and
@racket[append].) @racket[append].)
XXX algebra of interfaces (combine, extend, cut, contract, etc)
@subsection{Procedure Expressions, Local Binding, Local Definition, Definitions, and Assignments} @subsection{Procedure Expressions, Local Binding, Local Definition, Definitions, and Assignments}
One of the earliest wishes for R2 has been "match everywhere". I think One of the earliest wishes for R2 has been "match everywhere". I think
@ -325,6 +329,8 @@ XXX using struct transformers like this (and similar ones for other
types) give you access to more efficient generic operations, methods, types) give you access to more efficient generic operations, methods,
etc, and encourages you to write "typed" programs. etc, and encourages you to write "typed" programs.
XXX seals as a more fundamental feature?
@section{Classes and Objects} @section{Classes and Objects}
I'm tempted to say that Generics in R1 is a failure of the class I'm tempted to say that Generics in R1 is a failure of the class
@ -354,3 +360,5 @@ posn implements {
} }
}| }|
XXX generics for stuff like string? via the same mechanism?