Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Emily Eisenberg
c3f758c319 Add support for \left and \right
Summary:
Added stacked delimiter support for more delimiters. Split out delimiter
functions into its own file, and split out some tree building functions into a
common file. Supports the empty `.` delimiter with \left and \right, and doesn't
try to produce huge /, \backslash, <, or > delimiters. Depends on D7844

Test input:

\left( \left) \left[ \left\lbrack \left] \left\rbrack \left\{ \left\lbrace
\left\} \left\rbrace \left\lfloor \left\rfloor \left\lceil \left\rceil
\left\langle \left\rangle \left/ \left\backslash \left| \left\vert \left\|
\left\Vert \left\uparrow \left\Uparrow \left\downarrow \left\Downarrow
\left\updownarrow \left\Updownarrow {x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^{x^x}}}}}}}}}}
\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.
\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.
\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.\right.

Test Plan:
 - Run the test input, see that it works
 - Run the tests, see that they work
 - Look at huxley screenshots (not here yet :( ) and make sure they look good

Reviewers: alpert

Reviewed By: alpert

Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D11602
2014-09-04 21:58:43 -07:00
Emily Eisenberg
25374ea193 Change the scriptstyle size from 2/3em to 0.7em
Summary:
I don't know why we originally used 2/3em for scriptstyle, but both TeX
and MathJax use 0.7em for the scriptstyle size.

Test Plan:
- Look at huxley tests, make sure everything that changed is due to the change
  in font size

Reviewers: alpert

Reviewed By: alpert

Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D12869
2014-09-04 00:56:52 -07:00
Emily Eisenberg
fe6b67817c Add support for \overline
Summary:
Follow the instructions in the TeX book for drawing \overlines. This uses the
same code as fractions to produce the bars. Also added the ability to cramp
styles (i.e. T -> T' and T' -> T').

Test Plan:
 - Look at `\overline{x}`, `\overline{\dfrac{x}{y}+z}`, and
   `\blue{\overline{x}}` to make sure they look good.
 - Make sure the tests work
 - Make sure the huxley tests look good (Not here yet :( )

Reviewers: alpert

Reviewed By: alpert

Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D11604
2014-08-05 17:48:10 -07:00
Emily Eisenberg
0a3a2271f4 Add ability to calculate heights/depths
Summary:
This diff does a couple different things:

 - There is now a metrics/ folder, which contains the property files describing
   the metrics if the fonts, as well as a script for reading and printing the
   metrics in javascript.
 - Fractions and superscripts/subscripts are now rendered in slightly different
   ways now (notably, no use of inline-table). This allows for much more precise
   positioning of the superscripts, subscripts, numerators, and denominators,
   while still having an appropriate baseline. Also, there is no longer a
   sup/sub/supsub distinction, there are only supsubs with null sup/sub.
 - Using the new font metrics and by implementing the formulas found in The TeX
   Book, Appendix G, the heights and depths of all of the sub-expressions in a
   formula are now calculated. These are currently used to:
    - Correctly position superscripts, subscripts, numerators, and denominators
    - Adjust the height and depth of the overall expression so it takes up the
      appropriate space
 - Because we have to add attributes (height and depth) to every attribute, I
   have changed the way DOM nodes are assembled. Now, instead of assembling the
   DOM elements inline (which is a problem because we need to track
   height/depth, and we shouldn't (and can't in IE 8) attach raw attributes to DOM
   nodes), we assemble a pseudo-DOM structure with the extra information, and
   then actually assemble it at the very end.

The main page also now has an updated expression to show off and test the new
and improved parsing.

Test Plan:
View the main page, make sure that the expression renders. Make sure
that the tests pass. Make sure that expressions have the correct calculated
height (this is most easily tested by viewing them on the main page and making
sure that the top of the expression lines up with the bottom of the input box).

Reviewers: alpert

Reviewed By: alpert

Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D3442
2013-08-13 18:16:43 -07:00
Emily Eisenberg
79a50b3abe Make the linter happy
Auditors: alpert
2013-07-24 20:37:56 -07:00
Ben Alpert
e472b0ba9d Add TeX style support
Test Plan:
`\blue\frac12 + \frac{2(y-z)}{2+\frac1{7+\frac31}} \div \orange{\arctan x^{2+\frac43}_{2}} * 2^{2^{2^2}}` looks reasonable, as does
`\blue\frac12 + \dfrac{2(y-z)}{2+\frac1{7+\frac31}} \div \orange{\arctan x^{2+\frac43}_{2}} * 2^{2^{2^2}}`.

Reviewers: emily

Reviewed By: emily

Differential Revision: http://phabricator.khanacademy.org/D3047
2013-07-14 16:55:46 -07:00