Closes FB case 193

subtemplate: check that if the hash-table access worked, any new pvars are compatible with the old ones on which the cache is based (in the sense of "no new non-#f positions").

Also check that all derived variables from the same xᵢ have the same shape (i.e. don't filter out derived variables for this check).
This commit is contained in:
Georges Dupéron 2017-01-28 04:55:10 +01:00
parent c887cae4fe
commit eedc88f8e2
2 changed files with 145 additions and 39 deletions

150
main.rkt
View File

@ -189,20 +189,47 @@
(build-compound-type-name 'attribute-val/c depth bottom-predicate)
(λ (l)
(if (= depth 0)
(or (eq? l #f) (bottom-predicate l))
(or (eq? l #f)
(or (false? l) (bottom-predicate l))
(or (false? l)
(and (list? l)
(andmap (attribute-val/c (sub1 depth)) l)))))))
;; ellipsis-count/c works with attributes too, including missing (optional)
;; elements in the lists, at any level.
(define/contract (ellipsis-count/c depth [bottom-predicate any/c])
(->* {exact-nonnegative-integer?} {flat-contract?} flat-contract?)
;; Checks that all the given attribute values have the same structure.
;;
;; ellipsis-count/c works with the value of pattern variables and of attributes
;; too, including those missing (optional) elements in the lists, at any level.
;;
;; The lists must have the same lengths across all attribute values, including
;; the missing #f elements.
;;
;; If same-shape is #true, a #f in one attribute value implies #f in all other
;; attribute values at the same position. The same-shape check is not
;; performed on the bottommost #f values (as they do not influence the shape of
;; the tree).
(define/contract (ellipsis-count/c depth
[bottom-predicate any/c]
#:same-shape [same-shape #f])
(->* {exact-nonnegative-integer?}
{flat-contract?
#:same-shape boolean?}
flat-contract?)
;; Must be lazy, otherwise ellipsis-count/c would immediately call itself
(define (recur/c sublists)
((ellipsis-count/c (sub1 depth) bottom-predicate #:same-shape same-shape)
sublists))
(flat-named-contract
(build-compound-type-name 'ellipsis-count/c depth bottom-predicate)
(apply build-compound-type-name
(list* 'ellipsis-count/c depth bottom-predicate
(if same-shape
(list '#:same-shape same-shape)
(list))))
(λ (l*)
(true?
(and (list? l*)
(if (and same-shape (> depth 0))
(or (andmap false? l*) ;; all #f
(andmap identity l*)) ;; all non-#f
#t)
(let ([l* (filter identity l*)])
(if (= depth 0)
(andmap bottom-predicate l*)
@ -211,9 +238,7 @@
(or (empty? l*)
(apply andmap
(λ sublists
((ellipsis-count/c (sub1 depth)
bottom-predicate)
sublists))
(recur/c sublists))
l*)))))))))))
(define/contract (map-merge-stx-depth f l* depth)
@ -323,6 +348,8 @@
any/c)
(define val (or (for/or ([k (in-list keys)]) (hash-ref h k #f))
to-set))
;; Set the existing value (or new to-set if none) on all keys which
;; are not present in the hash table.
(for ([k (in-list keys)]) (hash-ref! h k val))
val)
@ -412,6 +439,8 @@
(define/with-syntax temp-derived (generate-temporary #'bound))
(define/with-syntax temp-valvar (generate-temporary #'bound))
(define/with-syntax temp-cached (generate-temporary #'bound))
(define/with-syntax temp-generated (generate-temporary #'bound))
(define/with-syntax temp-id-table (generate-temporary #'bound))
;; works only for syntax patterns, luckily that's all we need since we
;; produce a tree of (possibly missing) identifiers.
(define/with-syntax copy-attribute-pattern
@ -434,40 +463,85 @@
;; zᵢ …))])
;; the test above is not exactly right (zᵢ will still have the correct
;; binding), but it gives the general idea.
#`(begin ;(define-temp-ids #:concise tmp-str binder-ddd) ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;TODO: should fuse all the binder-ddd, so that if any one is not #f for a sublist, that sublist is generated.
#`(begin
(define-values (temp-generated)
(generate-nested-ids 'ellipsis-depth
(quote-syntax bound)
(quote-syntax binder₀)
(λ (v) (format tmp-str v))
(list (attribute* binder₀)
(attribute* binderᵢ)
)
(list (quote-syntax binder₀)
(quote-syntax binderᵢ)
)
whole-form-id))
(define-values (temp-id-table)
(multi-hash-ref! derived-valvar-cache
(list unique-at-runtime-idᵢ
)
(make-free-id-table)))
(define-values (temp-cached)
(free-id-table-ref! temp-id-table
(quote-syntax bound)
temp-generated))
;; TODO: we should check that if the hash-table access worked,
;; any new pvars are compatible with the old ones on which the cache is
;; based (in the sense of "no new non-#f positions")
(define temp-cached
(free-id-table-ref! (multi-hash-ref! derived-valvar-cache
(list unique-at-runtime-idᵢ
)
(make-free-id-table))
(quote-syntax bound)
(λ ()
(generate-nested-ids 'ellipsis-depth
(quote-syntax bound)
(quote-syntax binder₀)
(λ (v) (format tmp-str v))
(list (attribute* binder₀)
(attribute* binderᵢ)
)
(list (quote-syntax binder₀)
(quote-syntax binderᵢ)
)
whole-form-id))))
#;(define-syntax temp-derived
(derived-valvar (quote-syntax temp-cached)))
#;(define-raw-attribute bound
temp-valvar
temp-cached ;temp-derived
ellipsis-depth
#t)
;(define temp-cached (attribute* binder₀))
;; Check that all derived pvars for this subscript from all binders
;; have the same shape, i.e. we wouldn't want some elements to be missing
;; (as in ~optional) at some position from one derived pvar, but not from
;; others. This check implies that the original binder used did not
;; introduce new elements compared to the binders used for other derived
;; pvars, e.g:
;; (syntax-parse #'([1 2 3] #f)
;; [({~and {~or (xᵢ ...) #f}} ...)
;; (subtemplate ({?? (yᵢ ...) _} ...)) ;; => ((1/y 2/y 3/y) _)
;; (syntax-case #'([a b c] [d e]) ()
;; ;; introduces elements [d e] which were unknown when yᵢ was
;; ;; generated:
;; [((wᵢ ...) ...)
;; ;; Would give ((a/z b/z c/z) (d/z e/z)), but this is
;; ;; inconsistent with the shape of yᵢ.
;; (subtemplate ({?? (zᵢ ...) _} ...))])])
;; The check must also compare temp-generated, even if it was not
;; assigned to #'bound, so that it also cathes the error if we replace
;; zᵢ with yᵢ in the example above.
(unless ((ellipsis-count/c ellipsis-depth #:same-shape #t)
(cons temp-generated
(free-id-table-map temp-id-table (λ (k v) v))))
;; TODO: For now this will just blow up, a better error message would
;; be nice. Especially saying which one failed.
(raise-syntax-error
'sublist
(format (string-append
"some derived variables do not have the same ellipsis"
" shape\n"
" depth: ~a\n"
" attributes...:\n"
" ~a\n"
" attribute ~a if it were generated here...:\n"
" ~a")
'ellipsis-depth
(string-join (free-id-table-map
temp-id-table
(λ (k v)
(format "~a => ~a"
(syntax-e k)
(syntax->datum
(datum->syntax #f v)))))
"\n ")
'bound
(syntax->datum
(datum->syntax #f temp-generated)))
(quote-syntax whole-form-id)
(quote-syntax bound)
(free-id-table-map temp-id-table (λ (k v) k))))
;; manually creating the attribute with (make-attribute-mapping …)
;; works, but the attribute behaves in a bogus way when put inside
;; an (?@ yᵢ ...). I must be missing some step in the construction
;; of the attribute
;; TODO: I used make-attribute-mapping somewhere else, find it and change it !!!!!
(define/syntax-parse copy-attribute-pattern temp-cached)
(define-pvars bound))))

View File

@ -1084,4 +1084,36 @@
h/y ,(? symbol?
(app symbol->string (regexp #rx"xᵢ[0-9]+/y")))
a/y b/y
l/y m/y n/y o/y))))
l/y m/y n/y o/y))))
;; Incompatible shapes of different derived attributes:
(check-exn
#rx"some derived variables do not have the same ellipsis shape"
(λ ()
(convert-compile-time-error
(syntax-parse #'([1 2 3] #f)
[({~and {~or (xᵢ ...) #f}} ...)
(subtemplate ({?? (yᵢ ...) _} ...)) ;; => ((1/y 2/y 3/y) _)
(syntax-case #'([a b c] [d e]) ()
;; introduces elements [d e] which were unknown when yᵢ was
;; generated:
[((wᵢ ...) ...)
;; Would give ((a/z b/z c/z) (d/z e/z)), but this is
;; inconsistent with the shape of yᵢ.
(subtemplate ({?? (zᵢ ...) _} ...))])]))))
;; Incompatible shapes of the same attribute if it were generated at two
;; different points.
(check-exn
#rx"some derived variables do not have the same ellipsis shape"
(λ ()
(syntax-parse #'([1 2 3] #f)
[({~and {~or (xᵢ ...) #f}} ...)
(subtemplate ({?? (yᵢ ...) _} ...)) ;; => ((1/y 2/y 3/y) _)
(syntax-case #'([a b c] [d e]) ()
;; introduces elements [d e] which were unknown when yᵢ was
;; generated:
[((wᵢ ...) ...)
;; Would give ((a/z b/z c/z) (d/z e/z)), but this is
;; inconsistent with the shape of yᵢ.
(subtemplate ({?? (yᵢ ...) _} ...))])])))