Added support (and tests) for case statements in the control-flow graph
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd14ed56ba
commit
5c4bf74a75
|
@ -16,6 +16,27 @@ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
|
|||
with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- | The module for building control-flow graphs. Most statements are merely processed as-is (one statement becomes one node).
|
||||
-- The only cases of interest are the control structures.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- * Seq blocks are merely strung together with ESeq edges.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- * Par blocks have a dummy begin and end node. The begin node has outgoing links
|
||||
-- to all the members (EStartPar n), and the end nodes of each of the members has
|
||||
-- a link (EEndPar n) back to the the dummy end node. Thus all the par members thread
|
||||
-- back through the same common node at the end.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- * While loops have a condition node representing the test-expression. This condition node
|
||||
-- has an ESeq link out to the body of the while loop, and there is an ESeq link back from the
|
||||
-- end of the while loop to the condition node. It is the condition node that is linked
|
||||
-- to nodes before and after it.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- * Case statements have a slight optimisation. Technically, the cases are examined in some
|
||||
-- (probably undefined) order, with an Else option coming last. But since the expressions
|
||||
-- to check against are constant, I have chosen to represent case statements as follows:
|
||||
-- There is a dummy begin node with the test-expression. This has ESeq links to all possible options.
|
||||
-- The end of each option links back to a dummy end node.
|
||||
module FlowGraph (EdgeLabel(..), FNode(..), FlowGraph, buildFlowGraph, makeFlowGraphInstr) where
|
||||
|
||||
import Control.Monad.Error
|
||||
|
@ -35,7 +56,7 @@ import Utils
|
|||
-- and this identifier is unique and matches a later endpar link
|
||||
data EdgeLabel = ESeq | EStartPar Int | EEndPar Int deriving (Show, Eq, Ord)
|
||||
|
||||
data OuterType = None | Seq | Par
|
||||
data OuterType = None | Seq | Par | Case (Node,Node)
|
||||
|
||||
newtype FNode a = Node (Meta, a)
|
||||
--type FEdge = (Node, EdgeLabel, Node)
|
||||
|
@ -112,7 +133,26 @@ buildFlowGraph blank f s
|
|||
nEnd <- addDummyNode m
|
||||
addParEdges nStart nEnd nodes
|
||||
return (nStart, nEnd)
|
||||
_ -> return (-1,-1)
|
||||
buildStructured _ (A.OnlyP _ p) = buildProcess p
|
||||
buildStructured outer (A.OnlyO _ (A.Option m es p))
|
||||
= do nexp <- addNode' m (A.ExpressionList m es)
|
||||
(nbodys, nbodye) <- buildProcess p
|
||||
addEdge ESeq nexp nbodys
|
||||
case outer of
|
||||
Case (cStart, cEnd) ->
|
||||
do addEdge ESeq cStart nexp
|
||||
addEdge ESeq nbodye cEnd
|
||||
_ -> throwError "Option found inside CASE statement"
|
||||
return (nexp,nbodye)
|
||||
buildStructured outer (A.OnlyO _ (A.Else m p))
|
||||
= do (nbodys, nbodye) <- buildProcess p
|
||||
case outer of
|
||||
Case (cStart, cEnd) ->
|
||||
do addEdge ESeq cStart nbodys
|
||||
addEdge ESeq nbodye cEnd
|
||||
_ -> throwError "Option found inside CASE statement"
|
||||
return (nbodys,nbodye)
|
||||
buildStructured outer (A.Spec m spec str)
|
||||
= do n <- addNode' m spec
|
||||
(s,e) <- buildStructured outer str
|
||||
|
@ -131,6 +171,11 @@ buildFlowGraph blank f s
|
|||
addEdge ESeq n start
|
||||
addEdge ESeq end n
|
||||
return (n, n)
|
||||
buildProcess (A.Case m e s)
|
||||
= do nStart <- addNode' (findMeta e) e
|
||||
nEnd <- addDummyNode m
|
||||
buildStructured (Case (nStart,nEnd)) s
|
||||
return (nStart, nEnd)
|
||||
buildProcess p = do val <- (lift . lift) (f p)
|
||||
(liftM mkPair) $ addNode (findMeta p, val)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -139,6 +184,6 @@ buildFlowGraph blank f s
|
|||
-- So rather than using generics, we could have a small function dictionary instead.
|
||||
|
||||
-- Types definitely applied to:
|
||||
-- A.Specification, A.Process, A.Expression
|
||||
-- A.Specification, A.Process, A.Expression, A.ExpressionList
|
||||
|
||||
--TODO have scopeIn and scopeOut functions for Specification, and accordingly have two nodes produced by Structured
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -181,15 +181,34 @@ testWhile = TestList
|
|||
(A.Seq m0 $ A.Several m1 [A.OnlyP m6 sm7,A.OnlyP mU $ A.While m2 (A.True mU) $ A.Seq mU $ A.Several mU [A.OnlyP mU sm3,A.OnlyP mU sm9],A.OnlyP m4 sm5])
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
testCase :: Test
|
||||
testCase = TestList
|
||||
[
|
||||
testGraph "testCase 0" [(0,m10),(1,m0),(2,m3)] [(0,2,ESeq),(2,1,ESeq)] (A.Case m0 (A.True m10) $ cases m1 [A.Else m2 sm3])
|
||||
,testGraph "testCase 1"
|
||||
[(0,m10),(1,m0),(2,m2),(3,m3)]
|
||||
[(0,2,ESeq),(2,3,ESeq),(3,1,ESeq)]
|
||||
(A.Case m0 (A.True m10) $ cases m1 [A.Option m2 [A.True mU] sm3])
|
||||
,testGraph "testCase 2"
|
||||
[(0,m10),(1,m0),(2,m2),(3,m3),(4,m4),(5,m5)]
|
||||
[(0,2,ESeq),(2,3,ESeq),(3,1,ESeq), (0,4,ESeq),(4,5,ESeq),(5,1,ESeq)]
|
||||
(A.Case m0 (A.True m10) $ cases m1 [A.Option m2 [A.True mU] sm3, A.Option m4 [A.True mU] sm5])
|
||||
--TODO test case statements that have specs
|
||||
]
|
||||
where
|
||||
cases :: Meta -> [A.Option] -> A.Structured
|
||||
cases m = (A.Several m) . (map (A.OnlyO mU))
|
||||
|
||||
--TODO test replicated seq/par
|
||||
--TODO test ifs and cases
|
||||
--TODO test ifs
|
||||
--TODO test alts
|
||||
|
||||
--Returns the list of tests:
|
||||
tests :: Test
|
||||
tests = TestList
|
||||
[
|
||||
testSeq
|
||||
testCase
|
||||
,testPar
|
||||
,testSeq
|
||||
,testWhile
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user