One of the tests fails at the moment because the specification node has two entries associated with it in the flowgraph. One is the scope-in and one is the scope-out. I think the analysis is currently picking the scope-out node and looking beyond that, where -- surprise, surprise -- the variable is not used again. So I need some easy way of telling the flow analyses which of the two nodes I want to start from, in this case and other ones where I also add two nodes related to the same point in the AST.
As part of this patch, I have also introduced a helper function that fiddles the type system for those passes that must run at the top-level (i.e. on A.AST) rather than on any Data t. They will give an error if not applied at the top-level.
