This changes the Traversal API to the one that I've been working on in
the Polyplate branch, but implemented in terms of Data. The
performance isn't as good as the Polyplate version, but the code is a
lot simpler because it doesn't need all the type constraints (and it
doesn't make GHC struggle).
This also reworks all the passes in Tock to use the new API, including
those that previously used makeGeneric (which I've now removed) or
everywhereM. Most of the passes are simpler because of this, and I
suspect it's fixed a few subtle bugs resulting from missing recursion
in makeGeneric code.
I haven't yet profiled this, but subjectively it seems about the same
as the old Traversal (and thus faster for all the passes that didn't
yet use it).
Function returns are done in Rain by assigning to the function name, so we need a bit of extra code when checking assignments to see if the LHS is a function name.
The new behaviour is to check that both sides of a dyadic operator have the same type. This means that multiplying time by a scalar is no longer possible, but it also means (due to the lack of checks after unification) that multiplying two lists is possible, or concatenating two integers. This needs to be fixed by adding another pass.
Instead of storing the Constr, which was messy, we now store a String (to allow comparison of constructor types during unification) and a function to reform the type at the end of the type checking.
This patch hides all the old typeOfExpression, typeOfName, typeOfVariable, etc, and unifies them into a single type-class with an "astTypeOf" function. The type-class is currently named Typed, but that can easily be changed (it's only explicitly referred to in the Types module). The patch is essentially the type-class with a giant find-and-replace on the other modules.
We now have three kinds of canned tree traversals, all of which are smart about
which types they're applied to: explicit-descent transformations,
implicit-descent transformations, and implicit-descent checks. I've only
provided depth-first application of the latter two, but we could do
breadth-first in the future if necessary.
It's redundant, since you can always compute them from the variable, and it
makes the code that deals with actuals rather cleaner.
On the other hand, it slightly complicates some of the tests, because any names
you use in an Actual need to be defined...
