At the moment, the information is only needed in the parser, which must define recursive names before parsing the body of the function. But in future, we should keep the information when the function becomes a proc, and then the C/C++ backends may need to use it (for example, when calculating stack space usage)
Previously, such a function was an IntrinsicFunctionCall inside one expression of an ExpressionList, which the type-checker rejected. I've had to add a new constructor to ExpressionList, and I've quickly hacked together the line in the C backend to make it work -- but it does seem to work.
In actual parameters (checking against the formal type), abbreviations (checking against the inferred/specified destination type), and inputs (including inside ALTs) and outputs, direction specifiers are automatically added where needed. With all the other changes, this seems to compile all the occam 2 cgtests, and cgtest87 (which tests directions) as well as Adam's tests so I'm fairly confident that it was the right thing to do.
For now, I have fixed the occam parser so that it allows 1 or more direction specifiers after channel names. So c?? is valid, and should end up being equivalent to c?, but this may need altering later.
This lets you write things like "[cs! FOR 5]", which is horrible; I
would prefer "[cs FOR 5]!", since then that doesn't imply that you can
do things like "cs![0] ! 0".
However, Tock now compiles and passes cgtest87 -- the first occam-pi
cgtest we've handled. :)
This is mostly straightforward: modify the parser to allow direction
decorators in the right places, and extend the type checker to match.
There's some slight awkwardness in that some of the Types functions
have to perform the same checks as the type checker (e.g. directing a
non-channel), so I've tidied up their error messages a bit.
At the backend, I've just added a little pass to strip out all the
DirectedVariables, since the other backend passes don't handle them
gracefully. From the occam/C point of view this is fine, but I'm not
sure if it's going to cause problems for C++.
Previously it was a tuple, which meant it couldn't have sensible
custom instances. Token and TokenType now have Show instances, so we
get more useful output when parsing fails.
This fixes the AST, parser and typechecker, and adds a pass to
transform Result back into Abbrev, but doesn't transform Initial yet.
(It actually works for trivial stuff anyway, but it won't do the right
thing for complex types or PROC parameters.)
It appears (to me) to make sense to support INITIAL/RESULT reshaping
and retyping too, so this does.
Refs #42.
All the passes now have their information (name, pre-requisites and post- properties) stored at the point where the pass is declared, which means the pass lists are just a simple list of pass functions.
The main consequence of this change was that the tests had to be changed. Now, instead of taking a "pass applied to data" item (type: PassM b), they take both the pass (type: Pass) and source data (type: b), and apply them later. This was the decision that involved the simplest changes to the existing tests (simply unbracketing the application of the pass to the source). I also had to include a few old-style versions though (testPass', testPassShouldFail') for where the functions were being used to test things that weren't actually passes (mainly StructureOccam).
Fixes#48
As part of this patch, I have also introduced a helper function that fiddles the type system for those passes that must run at the top-level (i.e. on A.AST) rather than on any Data t. They will give an error if not applied at the top-level.
